I've been using this only for about a week. How many ads (and other stuff) have you blocked, /g/?
>>51954833
32k or 8%
>>51954833
uBlock is basically abandonware these days.
Here's a more powerful alternative: https://redmorph.com/articles/proof-in-the-packet.html
535826 or 8%
258k 11%
>>51954947
botnet
a
i
t
600000 or 9%
>>51954947
>proprietary software
>>51955389
881,840 or 9%
>>51954833
598K or 4%
>>51954947
Yup can't wait to pay monthly to block ads and have the company track the sites I goto that i'm paying...
Keep on sheep'n
>>51954947
>uBlock is basically abandonware these days.
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases
>last dev build released just hours ago
>last stable released just a week ago
Shill harder pls.
>>51954947
Tried it and it's objectively bullshit. It showed it blocked tracker x during my visit to site y, but site y doesn't link in any way to x (I know cause it's my own), so redmorph is just making shit up. Also, it's too fancy for what it's supposed to do so I don't trust it. If it has to shill itself in order to look good, it probably doesn't do a good job in the first place. Ublock on the other hand is just what it appears and it's perfect.
>>51956085
Redmorph has that adware/scamware antivirus kind of feel to it.
Like it may not be malicious code, but dammit it's trying to jew you.
>>51956085
You again, Chris? As I said yesterday, nobody is going to ask you what your website is. Stop making shit up.
>>51955565
Are you literally retarded? The adblocking and privacy protection features of Redmorph are completely free, and it has no whitelists, unlike Adblock Plus and uBlock. They only charge for the VPN service.
>>51956212
Chris doesn't develop uBlock anymore, he abandoned it in favor of his iOS/OS X blockers.
Also nobody is using uBlock unironically anymore; any sane person is using uBlock Origin.
>>51956224
>unlike Adblock Plus and uBlock
uBlock doesn't have the acceptable ads bullshit you dumbass.
Only ABP and AdBlock have those.
>>51956212
You again, shitposter? As I said yesterday, I'm not asking anyone to go on my fucking website. Stop imagining shit and thinking I want you faggots swarming my connection.
>>51954833
539,746 or 13%
my percentage is higher than anyone else's. fuck i'm cool.
>>51956224
>completely free
so we meet again, mr. shill.
because redmorph is "completely free," could you link me to the source?
>>51956279
>>51956212
Yeah when I say ublock I of course fucking mean ublock origin. Nobody fucking uses normal ublock cause it's shit. Why the fuck is it so hard for you faggots to get that when I say ublock I'm talking about ublock origin? Do you guys always say "microsoft windows" or "mac osx" instead of windows or osx? Nope.
>>51956315
>Why the fuck is it so hard for you faggots to get that when I say ublock I'm talking about ublock origin? Do you guys always say "microsoft windows" or "mac osx" instead of windows or osx? Nope.
i typically say what i mean, unlike your mentally impaired ass
>>51956315
>why do you think I mean uBlock when I say uBlock
Gee I wonder why you fucking retard. Since there are two similar extensions with very similar names you of course have to type out the full thing.
Also why the fuck would you mention Chris if you were referring to uBlock Origin? He doesn't, and never did, have anything to do with uBlock Origin. Ever.
STOP BEING A FUCKING RETARD
>>51956305
Extensions are just compressed zip folders these days. Feel free to download, extract it and check it out.
>>51956315
We assume you're talking about the official uBlock because that's the one with a website (https://ublock.org) and promoted by the official development team.
>>51956315
this is the board that unironically uses the term GNU/Linux
509,437 or 10%
>>51956348
>Feel free to download
>>51956364
>Is the browser extension available on Firefox or Safari?
>No, but Coming Soon!
https://redmorph.com/help.html
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/redmorph-browser-controll/ghpfnohpiocmklpejkcliiloniceahdo
>>51956305
>my percentage is higher than anyone else's
Not so fast...
109,479 or 14%
>>51956343
I didn't fucking mention Chris! That was the shitposter, not me. You guys are the only ones ever bringing the shitty original ublock up like it's some sort of required ritual. It's like those people who still think german means nazi and nazi is all they ever hear when you speak of germans.
>>51956348
What the hell does that have to do with determining which one I'm talking about? Completely non-sequitur logic.
>>51956406
>I didn't fucking mention Chris! That was the shitposter, not me.
Doesn't matter who the fuck it was, but the fact that he was mention was the reason I associated it with "uBlock by Chris" and not uBlock Origin.
>>51956406
>comparing open souce to nazism
>>51956439
You must be that same shitposter again who makes up random shit and then claims someone else said it
>>51956382
sorry, can't hear you over this giant-ass red button
>>51954833
1,491,187 or 8%
>>51956480
That button is there for the convenience of regular users (who are all on Chrome). Advanced users will make sure to read the FAQ before downloading anything, and then learn that the Firefox version is still under development.
404,802 or 9%
This is after I updated to Win10, and also after reinstalling Firefox with a fresh profile, otherwise it'd probably be triple that... which is sad. The poor ad ridden internet...
>>51956503
That's a shame, go shill somewhere else, retard.
>>51956503
Advanced users will not download this scamware despite your shilling efforts.
>>51956503
or everyone will click the giant-ass red download button and quickly discover that you suck at making user interfaces
your idea of "advanced" and "regular" users is completely contrived and has no basis in reality
>>51956559
>>51956573
>>51956581
I'm sorry if you aren't getting enough attention with your defamation attacks, but you should refrain from posting 3 times in a row, son.
>>51954833
>269,258 or 4%
few months
>>51956296
yet they fail to block embedded video + audio ads and those shitty clickbait articles, dumbshit.
>>51956610
uBlock Origin blocks exactly what you tell it to.
If you need it to block more stuff – enable more filters.
Or if you care more about aggressive blocking than site breakage, disable the Unbreak list.
What does the percentage mean?
>>51956606
remember, dad, being a petulant cock can never substitute good arguments
>defamation
holy shit, shill confirmed
>>51956691
>calls everyone with different tastes shills
>>51956679
Go back to 4th grade and you'll learn it.
>>51956732
dude, i've been arguing with this asshole for like 24 hours across at least 2 different threads. he tirelessly defends an entirely pointless piece of shitware that no one uses against any and all objections.
i agree that calling users shills solely because they disagree is silly, but i'm not. read the dude's posts, especially >>51956503 and >>51954947. he's going hard.
>>51956748
still doesn't make sense. 7% of what?
>>51956791
Of all requests (web pages, scripts, CSS files, staticimages, gifs etc.). Every single piece of each website you open. 7% of all of them have been blocked since you installed uBlock.
>>51956774
It seems that it's you who have been trying too hard. Why would you keep a personal database of what people post here and take the time to create even webms? What's your agenda?
>>51956869
i don't keep a personal database. i just enjoy pissing you off.
and making webms isn't difficult. here you go: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Capture/Desktop
>>51956832
So why are people happier about a higher percentage? That means you browse more malicious websites lmao
>>51956899
If you ever decide to look for a job and improve your life, try this: http://www.indeed.com/
>>51957008
They are technically illiterate guys who find themselves smart, but they don't know that much about what their pieces of software do under the hood.
seit Installation
934.032 oder 4 %
>>51954833
1,011,624 or 6%
>>51957079
only 934? you dont use the internet alot do you?
>>51957021
i'm on winter break. finals ended on monday.
don't project, bro
>>51957043
i believe i hear a thunderous whoosh
>>51957101
in proper countries, we write 1 Million this way:
1.000.000
some day your burgerclaps wlll learn :^)
395,336 or 3% (running alongside umatrix)
>>51954833
Adblocking is theft.
How do you think the internet should work if everyone would block ads?
>>51954833
>>51957221
Get a real job, nigger.
>>51957221
>Adblocking is theft.
Advertising on websites is bandwidth theft.
429,961, 13%
116,869 or 8%
But I also use uMatrix, so I think that catches a lot of things before uBlockO does.
>>51954833
since install
360,952 or 11%
>>51956305
>my percentage is higher than anyone else's. fuck i'm cool.
Well, mine's 15%
since install
752.727 or 8%
>>51957008
More filters which block things like share widgets.
133,906 or 3%
>>51954947
only on BOTNET browser, nope...
1 279 420 or 8%
>>51954833
>implying
565,720 or 11%
195,991 or 15%
>>51956503
Could this possibly sound more like a desperate dev trying to calm down people on his forum?
Stop shilling your buttcoin miner on /g/ faggot, it's pathetic how bad you are at it.
291,499 or 4%
Should have installed this thing way before
>>51957101
>reading 934.032 as 934 and a fraction while knowing it's an integer counter
You're a special kind of retard
>>51957221
A lot better since we'd only see content the publishers feel is worth sharing with people as opposed to publishers constantly publishing shit and clickbait because they know they get money from pageviews.
>>51954947
RedMorph Browser Controller v0.2.5 - all recommended settings enabled, default configuration.
Ghostery v5.4.8.1 - all blocking settings enabled (Advertising, Analytics, Beacons, Privacy, Widgets set to block all), strictest possible configuration.
Ublock Origin v1.3.3 – default filter lists and rules, default configuration.
>Origin v1.3.3 – default filter lists and rules, default configuration.
> default filter lists and rules, default configuration.
>default configuration.
>>51954833
seit Installation
43.272 oder 7 %
it's been 5 days
>>51962717
His message sounds like the desperate cry of someone who's against adblocking and is shilling for an inefficient botnet (: Let him be..
>>51957221
>purposely blocking ads is a crime now
>1,594,462 or 32%
mfw 1 out of every 3 requests by my browser is for ads/tracking bullshit
almost 30,000,000
>>51962869
>63%
damn nigga
are you an adtester or some shit
>>51962927
No, but a decent bit of youtube and russian torrent sites and shit which throw up ads like no ones business.
>>51962959
how long you been using it?
30.076 o 12%
>>51962997
It would depend on if it reset my statistics when I upgraded to windows 10, which I assume it has.
So since launch day for windows 10.
1,086,182 or 2%
step it up
>>51964144
>2%
that's impressively small amount o.O
>>51964194
>o.O
o.O <- faggot
>>51954833
328.500 of 6%
dunno why it's so small
>>51962959
YouTube in particular gets up to hundreds of uBlock hits from just one video if it's a long one
ayy
>>51956610
No...? I never see ads in any video, be it YouTube, that shitty Twitch site, anything.
unfortunately i don't have origin because it's not available on safari ;_;
if i knew how to port it, i would learn whatever it took with a safari port as the end goal.
what am i missing out on by not being a part of the Origin master race, /g/?
>>51964213
>faggot
I'm a girl though..
what is the colorblind thing? i am colorblind and i can see no difference
>>51965235
Doesn't make a difference.
>>51954833
191 690 %13
>>51965235
i also use privacybadger, made by the EFF it learns what to block over time, and it does not block add which dont track you.
>>51954833
67,806 or 7%
>>51964213
Why is it that you cant post such emotes?
Or are only the 12 year olds on this site complaining about this shit.
>>51965458
>Why is it that you cant post such emotes?
because this is an imageboard, its for images.
>>51965366
Well that doesn't apply to me. And my comment was a legit question, there was no need for this jerk-tier reaction of yours: >>51964213
>>51965408
Oh it's okay, everyone's an edgy 12 y/o at some point in their life. Some for longer than the other though..
>>51965505
>Oh it's okay, everyone's an edgy 12 y/o at some point in their life. Some for longer than the other though..
answering shitpostery with shitposts. hows that working out? how about you talk about OP's subject instead?
>>51965505
>Well that doesn't apply to me. And my comment was a legit question, there was no need for this jerk-tier reaction of yours:
That wasn't me. I was just making clear that everybody here is equal.
Faggot isn't a word exclusive for gay men and it never was.
>>51965545
>everybody here is equal
except those with 4chan pass :^)
>>51965524
>OP
That happens to be me. I opened this thread yesterday night.
>>51965545
I think it is. And even if it wasn't there was not need for such a reaction.
>>51954833
463 274 (8%)
>>51965235
>I'm a girl though..
Fuck off homotrap. Putting on your sister's skirt doesn't make you a girl.
>>51966002
see yourself >>>/out/
>>51964213
>>51965408
>>51965978
>>51966825
honest question: what prompted all of you to become this edgy?
did you just become a dipshit one day, or did you experience a tragic life event or something?
>>51966894
Honest question: what made you believe you'd be better off making a declaration of what type of dangly bits you have in response to someone calling you a faggot instead of just ignoring him?
>>51966937
i'm someone else.
still, i'm sorry that someone countering an invalid insult causes you to be this buttblasted
>>51966937
This. There is absolutely no reason to write
>im a grill btw
It's almost worse than tripfags. This is an anonymous board. Stop trying to get attention.
Unfortunately there are homos like >>51966894 that always come to the rescue.
>>51967229
>homos
ah, the edge continues
do you really want to be the guy who thinks gay = bad in 2016? pathetic desu
551k adds
>>51954833
101388 15%
0%
It hides the ads after loading them.
>>51967348
Ah the whiteknighting continues. Pathetic cuck.
>>51968061
>cuck
oh shit, you got me! your memes are just too good
87,262 or 7%
>>51967348
>do you really want to be the guy who thinks gay = bad in 2016?
Do you really think calling someone gay, faggot etc. on the Internet actually means the person is against same-sex relationships?
Like, do you calling people nigger or something means the poster believe the recipient is black and hates him because of his skin color?
Are you this fucking dense? If you take everything people say on the internet literally you must've had a bad time playing video games as a kid, hearing about all those other kids that have slept with your mother.
>>51968135
welcome to 4chan, where admitting you're female is more offensive than calling someone a "nigger."
makes sense, right?
>Do you really think calling someone gay, faggot etc. on the Internet actually means the person is against same-sex relationships?
if you're insulting someone by calling them gay, what other point of view could you have?
>you must've had a bad time playing video games as a kid, hearing about all those other kids that have slept with your mother.
i guess a childhood spent on xbox live explains your shitty behavior. to >>>/v/ with you
>>51968224
>i guess a childhood spent on xbox live explains your shitty behavior
I've actually never owned an Xbox of either generation. My last console was the Nintendo 64. Stop projecting.
59,581 or 6%
>>51968283
>Stop projecting
so you respond to my implicit accusation of projection with a counter-accusation of projection on the same topic?
you literally just said "oh you," then? well played. you are truly a master of rhetoric.
>>51968371
No, mine post was a fair assumption based on how <triggered> you got.
Yours was just projecting and completely false. That's the difference.
>>51968416
>mine post was a fair assumption ... Yours was just projecting and completely false
so we both made incorrect guesses, but you're still right because you are? damn, you're getting more convincing by the second.
>triggered
keep attacking that spooky scary strawman, buddy.
>>51965143
>using safari
you know firefox OS10 port exists right?
>>51968537
Is this all going on your tumblr later?
>>51968537
>so we both made incorrect guesses
The difference is I made assumptions based on data ITT (like the amount of times you were triggered) whereas you just made some wild accusation based on nothing.
801,503 or 9%
>>51968758
>tumblr
you're the first to mention tumblr. do you have something to tell us, anon?
>>51968851
And you're the first to be a homo. Do you have something to tell your parents, anon?
Just a reminder that the WWW is able to exist because of ads, if you want to continue having free access to websites then don't use an adblocker.
>>51968893
glad to hear from you again, mr. santorum. how's the campaign?
>>51954833
Reminder that ublock only hides ads and doesn't block them. If you want a proper adblocking extension, you need a proper HOSTS file and adblock plus, instead of this placebo piece of shit.
>>51969082
1¢ has been deposited into your account.
Well shilled!
>>51968893
is it that time of the month again
>mfw i run both
>>51969153
Do you realize how retarded that is?
ABP does literally nothing extra. Just make sure you have the filters in uBlock Origin instead.
>>51969194
i wanted to give uBlock a try so i got both
>>51969153
Try out Redmorph. It blocks more than all of those combined.
>>51969222
Shill pls go.
>>51969222
Redmorph shill fuck off
510,956 or 10%
>>51969222
>Only on BOTNET browser...
LEL
>>51969222
what's up, shillbro? i've missed you so much over the last 18 hours.
>>51969304
>Is the browser extension available on Firefox or Safari?
>No, but Coming Soon!
>>51969340
i think this is a good time to remind you to fix your download button to include this information, mr. shill.
>>>51956364
>>51969450
Not OP, but why don't you contact them about that button if you care so much about it? I'm happy enough that it works on my browser, which is also used by most people in the world.
>>51969483
>why don't you contact them about that button if you care so much about it?
i already told you, bud
>[Chrome] is also used by most people in the world.
uh https://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx
>>51969525
Green = Chrome
>>51969571
typically, people who want to be taken seriously don't post images without citations
>>51969560
go away
>>51969571
lolno
https://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=0&qpcustomd=0
>>51969614
: A world map with countries painted in different colours representing the most used web browsers in the world for both computers & mobiles. (Data from Stat Counter)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Browser_Market_Map_June_2015.svg
>>51957221
I think fucking normies can pay for shit. Hell, I'd steal cash out of people's wallets if there was no chance of getting caught.
You think politicians and investment bankers give a shit that they're exploiting the public? Of course not. So why should I care if other people pay for the websites I use?
>>51965235
Tits or GTFO.
>>51954833
>>51969650
>trusting a shittier google analytics
>>51969525
>>51969638
How does this site collect its data?
>>51970373
They make up stats from their assholes. The official stats from all big players say that Chrome is the only relevant browser outside Japan and Korea
>>51970397
>from their asshole
your comment
>>51970373
http://gs.statcounter.com/about
http://gs.statcounter.com/faq#methodology
>StatCounter is a web analytics service. Our tracking code is installed on more than 3 million sites globally. These sites cover various activities and geographic locations. Every month, we record billions of page views to these sites. ... we calculate our Global Stats on the basis of more than 15 billion page views per month, by people from all over the world onto our 3 million+ member sites.
>
>In September 2015, our global sample consisted of 16.3 billion page views (US: 2.7 billion); 2.3 billion of these were search engine referrals (US: 404 million); 576 million of these were social media referrals (US: 155 million).
>>51962717
>Ghostery
>helping the ad industry by installing their software and letting them run analytics on you
>>51954833
249K, or 6%
