Most people's systems are coloured as fuck so who gives a shit? For real sound quality you go for good recordings/masterings instead.

It's not a meme. There are literally 0 confirmed ABX test results proving someone can tell a 192 vbr opus file from a flac. Opus is just that good. Though audible transparency can be reached as low as 128 vbr for most people.

>>51917226
You will never find a reputable test where somebody has been able to determine 320 from FLAC, audiophiles won't even try as it just makes them look dumb after spending thousands.

>192 vbr
>not 512k hard cbr opus master race
pleb

https://u.pomf.io/qltyso.opus

>>51917374
>You will never find a reputable test where somebody has been able to determine 320 from FLAC

https://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=39314

>>51917430
Also

https://cse.google.gr/cse?cx=partner-pub-4544327213918729:3255231357&ie=UTF-8&q=problem+sample&sa=Search&ref=&gws_rd=cr&ei=ZB9zVrXDOcyxsQGYj6_4Cg#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=lame%20problem%20sample

>>51917394
>not glorious LPCM 32/192

> mediainfo /home/snd/5                                                                                                                                                                                                          ~
General
Complete name                            : /home/snd/5
Format                                   : Wave
File size                                : 5.02 GiB
Duration                                 : 1h 18mn
Overall bit rate mode                    : Constant
Overall bit rate                         : 9 216 Kbps
Writing application                      : Lavf56.40.101

Audio
Format                                   : PCM
Format settings, Endianness              : Little
Format settings, Sign                    : Signed
Codec ID                                 : 00001000-0000-0100-8000-00AA00389B71
Duration                                 : 1h 18mn
Bit rate mode                            : Constant
Bit rate                                 : 9 216 Kbps
Channel(s)                               : 2 channels
Channel positions                        : Front: L R
Sampling rate                            : 192 KHz
Bit depth                                : 24 bits
Stream size                              : 5.02 GiB (100%)

>>51917430
>>51917440
What about Opus?

>>51917394
meh, still not as bad as flac

>>51917485
I don't know, but it's unlikely the psychoacoustic model doesn't fail under some samples.

In any case, making saying "You will never find a reputable test where somebody has been able to determine 320 from FLAC" is incorrect.

On the other hand, V0 or 320kbps mp3 (V0 is better for quality as some samples can go above 320kbps when needed, drawing bits from the bit reservoir) are perfectly transparrent for 99.5% of audio out there. That's good enough for me.

>>51917394 (You)
>>51917508
here is the original cd rip :
https://u.pomf.io/niyytk (flac file)
now tell me the difference

>>51917592
see
>>51917581
>V0 or 320kbps mp3 (V0 is better for quality as some samples can go above 320kbps when needed, drawing bits from the bit reservoir) are perfectly transparrent for 99.5% of audio out there. That's good enough for me.

I just like for claims to be accurate. Your original claim was not.

>>51917226
Not a meme. Drop it down to 128kbps and do an ABX. There still might not be an audible difference.

>>51917637
This so fucking much.

Opus 128kbps vbr is the perfect spot for quality/filesize ratio.

>FLAC on computer
>q4 Vorbis on smartphone

What else would I need? True master race.

>using memepus which needs to resample your music

Nice meme.

>>51917394
I might as well become an audiophile after listening to this.

not a meme. I personally use 128 opus for my phone though.