>16:9
>FreeSync

>>51910028
>16:9
What's wrong?

>FreeSync
Supports the range from 35 till 144, what's the problem?

16:9 sucks ass 3:2 for life.

>>51910141
16:9 for life brah

>>51909980
Already preordered a month ago.

I don't speak slavshit please translate.

>>51910361
Not OP, but...
>IPS
>1ms reaction time
>144 Hz
>35-144 Hz Freesync range
>WQHD
>excellent Eizo warranty, 5 years with on-site exchange, 6 months from purchase if you have as much as one bright subpixel, you get a new one

>>51910432
Oh, and I forgot the most important part
>less than 1ms display lag

>>51910432
How much and can you order one in the States?

Freesync is shit until (if, more likely) NVIDIA adopts it.

>>51910447
AMD improved Freesync and it's on par with G-sync now.

It should be available in the states some time this month. For Germany it's unfortunately later, in January. It's 1100 Euro for one over here.

>>51910473
>1100 euro
>$1200 US dollars
Can already get a monitor like that for cheaper that will actually work with NVIDIA cards. No reason for a Freesync monitor to cost as much as a G-Sync one. It's shit.

My statement had nothing to do with Freesync being better or worse than G-Sync. AMD cards are not worth buying, so until (and it probably won't ever because NVIDIA are Jews) NVIDIA adopts Freesync support, it is worthless.

>>51909980
>paying for overpriced gay men shit

>>51910521
You can't buy a better gaming display. It may be expensive, but it's also the best on the market. If you don't want to spend that much on your hobby, that's up to you.

>>51910510
AMD cards are well worth buying. If you want G-sync, your best display is that Acer one with IPS. It has a 144Hz IPS panel with 3ms display lag and G-snyc. But it has neither the QC nor the warranty of Eizo.

>>51910655
>on your hobby

>>>/v/

>>51910720
>implying I don't care more about hardware than games

>>51910361
op here, sorry posted wrong link, here:

http://www.eizoglobal.com/products/foris/fs2735/index.html

>>51910473
it's not up to AMD to improve freesync,
it's on the monitor manufacturers

>>51910755
Well, rest assured, Eizo does their shit well.
AMD also can improve on it, with features such as frame doubling when your FPS drop below the Freesync range.

>>51910780
>35
I really don't care about dipping below 35 FPS.

Just disable goyworks. :-))

>>51910655
>AMD cards are well worth buying.


Nice meme.

>2560x1440
Dropped. Only want UHD.

>>51910840
Currently you can choose between UHD and WQHD at 144Hz at similar price points. Whatever suits your needs best.

>>51910840
>30 fps
>stupid high reaction time
>stupid high display lag
>no content

wew

>>51910807
So what if you dip below 35Hz? The AMD driver will just display each frame twice, internally doubling FPS at no cost, and stay within Freesync range.

>>51910432
>>51910443

It has 4ms response time, shill.
http://www.eizoglobal.com/products/foris/fs2735/index.html#tab02

>>51910028
You don't need FreeSync or G-Sync at 144Hz, it actually adds almost 20ms to your response time.
http://www.blurbusters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/lag-csgo.png

>>51910897
why would I dip below 35 hz when investing tons of cash to be above 100 hz ?

>EIZO
Literally who

>>51909980
Why does Europe get all the good tech first

I can't even find Eizo monitors to audition in my city

>>51910904
>Typische Reaktionszeit [Grau-Grau-Wechsel] 1 ms (Blur Reduction on)
>Reaction time, grey to grey

https://www.eizo.de/foris/fs2735/

Educate yourself.


>>51910924
Japanese Manufacturer of high end displays.

>>51910945
>weeb shit
Lol,why would anyone buy nipshit when they can buy American quality like Dell and Apple?

>>51910924
>Literally who
doesn't know top of the line display manufacturer

>>51910912
I don't know. It's mostly for those with 60 Hz Freesync displays, I guess. I'm very well making sure to stay >100Hz, but even then there's scenes in almost every game where either the CPU or GPU hits a cap and briefly dips below 100. I never see framerates below 70 though.

>>51910904
>You don't need FreeSync or G-Sync at 144Hz
You do. I accidentally had g-sync disabled with v-sync off and saw massive screen tearing earlier today.
>>51910904
>http://www.blurbusters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/lag-csgo.png
Yes, and? If you go above your monitor's refresh rate with g-sync you get tearing and by default the driver forces v-sync when you hit that limit to stop tearing. That's why his input lag is huge at 144hz. The best way to deal with it is to limit it below your monitor's refresh rate to get no input lag + no screen tearing.
I personally play cs:go limited to 128fps for the best experience.

>>51910957
Even Dell and Apple buy their panels from Japanese and Korean manufacturers.

>>51910986
>replying to shitpost

>144 Hz input Gaming Monitor with Smartphone and Cloud Solutions
>Gaming
>with Smartphone and Cloud Solutions

Why the fuck would I want "Cloud" shit on a monitor? And it's a "Gaming" one because the back has some red?

>>51910976
>http://www.blurbusters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/lag-csgo.png

Does not load.

>>51911003
geezus, just end yourself

>>51911012
I know, I've just seen people read and say g-sync introduces input lag so much that I have the image burned into my brain. Most people don't get that with free-sync and g-sync monitors v-sync is forced by the drivers automatically if you hit at least your max refresh rate by default.

>>51911003
I can control the OSD with your phone, and the cloud apparently offers calibration profiles uploaded by pro-gamers.
You don't have to use it, but it's there.

It's gaming because it, before all else, focuses on features important for gamers, namely Freesync, input lag (0.05 frames, as their specs say, no real world tests yet), high refresh rates and low response time.

>>51911033
It does not force vsync on. You can use it with vsync off as well, at least that was the case last time I looked into it.

>>51910957
I heard somewhere the Eizo were better for vido editing than Dell...is this true?

>>51911051
>no name weeb brand
>better than multi-billion conglomerate known for their professional products for over 2 decades

It's like saying OpenOffice is better than Microsft Office because they both got Officer in their name.

File: 22[1].jpg (166 KB, 1066x600) Image search: [Google]

166 KB, 1066x600

>>51911047
>It does not force vsync on.
Do you have a g-sync monitor? By default for me it's done this and wasn't even an option to disable it until recently. And AMD does the same thing with FreeSync.

>>51910191
16:10 is where it's at, niggers

>>51911114
Yeah, we know. Unfortunately it's expensive, and most solutions don't exist in that format. I haven't heard of a display with 2560x1600@144Hz and Freesync yet.

>>51911047
exactly, you can run freesync with vsync off, and you can also turn vsync on to handle dips below supported freesync range of the monitor

>>51911139
because 16:10 isn't a gayming ratio. only dumb gaymers care about muh 144hz

>>51911166
If all you care is about websites/test/desktop usage, you're even better off with 4:3 than 16:10.

>>51911183
i do photo processing/graphic design and i'm super happy with my 4:3 + 16:10 combo

>Paying 1100 euros for shit you can get for 800-900 from Asus

top cuck

also
>paying 900 euros for something you can get for 600e from Asus

lmao

>>51911192
And I wholeheartedly agree with you. 16:9 has a lot of downsides, particularly when viewing text.
But it's the cheapest format per pixel, and almost all media are being produced in a 16:9 format, and have been for almost 10 years now. Games expect that aspect ratio, and video and image now usually/often have that format.

>>51911221
This display is superior to the Asus alternative in every aspect. Every single one.

>>51911247
Placebo desu senpai.

>>51911236
i get it, brah. any good 27" 2560x1600 monitors out there for ~300€, btw? i've been meaning to upgrade from my 1680x1050 but i don't want to break the bank. also, i'm wary of windows' scaling issues and because of that i wonder if i'd be better suited with a 1920x1200 screen

>>51909980
>FreeSync

shit, I got cucked by Nvidia again. Gsync version when?

>>51909980
I wanted to jump to the 1440p + 144hz but the new IPS row is fucking 800€
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/asus_rog_swift_pg279q.htm
Price?

>>51911221
>ASKEKS

>>51911325
That monitor has same fucking panel as the MG279Q version, you just pay 250-350 euros more for the Gsync.

Literally getting kukkolded right there.

>>51911294
For 300 Euro you can buy one of those Korean WQHD panels. Personally I have a QX2710 that overclocks to 120Hz like a charm.
I always use 100% scaling have zero problems to read text size 8 at arms distance.

>>51911356
those are 16:9 though. thanks anyway

>>51911325
The Eizo Foris FS2735 costs 1100 on the Eizo official website when you preorder. Retail will probably be less.
It trumps the Asus one in every aspect though. Better panel, better reaction time, much less display lag, better freesync range and massively better service and warranty.

>>51911317
Do not expect a Gsync version. I don't think Eizo has made a single Gsync display yet.

>>51911379
Oh right, my miss.
Nope, not a chance. 16:10 displays cost ~30-40% more then an equal 16:9 display. The Koreans don't make those, so you're stuck with Dells or Samsungs whatever you can get, which probably way over 500 Euro.

>>51911247
Except it's not, the only superior aspect is the freesync range, otherwise they are almost exactly the same specifications, for twice the price.
Besides, it's not even out, so you can't even know if the panel is any good. Specs can be good on paper, but the panel can be horse shit.

>>51911390
>1100
fuck it, then
You must be literally insane/retarded to buy that shit

>>51911413
i just saw a pixel perfect korean 30" 2560x1600 for 330$ on ebay. any sellers i can trust, in your experience?

>>51911221
What are you? A poorfag or something?senpai

>>51911450
Yes I am poor and watch my money carefully, is there something bad in that?

Its only 1100€, what a great deal, thanks for letting me know abbout this OP, gonna buy 3.

Dont ever get a 16:10 monitor

>most video games will have black bars
>movies and anime will have bigger black bars
>if you connect a console it will also have black bars

16:10 goes into the trash, i learned the hard way

>>51911503
I have 32" Ultra Sharp with 16:10 and I have not once gotten black bars on video shit.

Dont really care of bigger black bars on movies, they're there anyway .

>Console
lol

>>51911503
>most video games will have black bars
don't care
>movies and anime will have bigger black bars
don't care
>if you connect a console it will also have black bars
don't care

some people have different needs, senpai. i learned that the hard way

>>51911450
He just heard IPS and think its the same shit, what is behind the display i.e, silicone, driving circuitry and back lighting is an unknown concept to most people

>>51911514
not just console you stupid fuck, any 1080p source will have black bars and thats just retarded

>>51911552
They're really minor thing to deal with.

>>51911458
Yes. now go clean my toilet

>>51911552
>any 1080p source will have black bars and thats just retarded
this
Still this board is filled with retards so who cares let them be retarded

>>51911564
we all know you poop on the street, rajeesh. you're not fooling anyone

>>51911564
I don't work in bathroom cleaning, do you?

>>51911444
It's hit and miss, they all use A- panels. Some will be perfect, other have dead pixels.
"Perfect pixel" is a scam.

>>51911570
>>51911552
Does this really trigger you that much? I guess having used laptops alot I got used to seeing black bars a lot and dont mind them at all in 16:10 resolution of my US.

>>51911584
oh well, i guess i'll have to do with a 27" dell 1920x1200. at least i'll be able to read the text :P

>>51911475
>>51911430
Don't worry, anons, one day you'll be able to afford nice things as well.

>>51911576
I was offering a job. No wonder you are a poorfag.

>>51911575
The streets need cleaning too, but i guess you live in a shithole, mohammad

>>51911617
I need to trade my time for money unlike you, subhuman piece of shit with moms wallet, so I'm not wasting it even if I can afford it

File: 00002.mpls_snapshot_01.12.59_[2015.12.13_21.46.33].jpg (150 KB, 629x979) Image search: [Google]

150 KB, 629x979

>>51911629
Why you think I'd like to clean toilets

>>51911655
>implying I don't have to spend 11 workdays worth of money on it.
But it's something nice that'll last me for years to come. I'm not gonna cheap out now and buy an Asus or Acer or Benq. They're all crap.

>>51911617
Why would you get some cuck resolution, butchered 16:10 instead of saving up 300 euros more and get a 32" UltraSharp?

Is this some pro gaymer meme thing where you, non-CS player think you need 144hz monitor with 1ms time for your GTA V?

The fuck is wsrong with you

That monitor should cost 800-900 tops.

>>51911695
And it probably will be, once it hits retail. That price is straight from the manufacturer.

Have you ever used a 144Hz display with 1ms display lag? It's something you don't want to miss again after having it once.

>>51911659
You dont have to like the job to do it.

>>51910976
I get no screen tearing on my XB270H with V-Sync and G-Sync off. Or maybe I do but I can't notice it. On the other hand my other older 74Hz monitor tears like shit.

>>51911722
I have PG279 from Asus.
I got jewed, I got keked.

>>51911745
>I get no screen tearing on my XB270H with V-Sync and G-Sync off.
>Or maybe I do but I can't notice it.
Pretty sure that's it. Because if screen tearing didn't happen all this shit wouldn't exist. I do notice with my 144hz monitor though that the tears only seem to happen on the far bottom of the screen. Not sure what that's about.

>>51910945
>https://www.eizo.de/foris/fs2735/
"Blur reduction" mode totally isn't dropping the refresh rate to 120Hz, right? Because that would not mean 144Hz 1ms.

>>51911780
Can somebody explain what screen tearing is?

File: 178784321321.gif (220 KB, 160x120) Image search: [Google]

220 KB, 160x120

>GAMING MONIT-

Stopped reading there.

So apparently EIZO went from premium, top class displays to absolute sell-out consumer crap.

Good to know.

>>51911810
Have you never turned v-sync off?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVAFuUAKPMc

>>51911780
What's the point though if it's basically impossible to detect? The only thing wrong with that monitor of mine is slight ghosting unless I'm using 120Hz ULMB(which I get sick from and it fucks up my reality perception, anybody else gets that?)

>>51911810
1 frame overlaying another one which looks annoying as fuck

>>51909980
>1440p
>Not 8K
>Not 5K
>Not even 4K
>KING!
I have no doubt that it is an excellent screen, as Eizo is the Seasonic of the monitor world, but it is still 1440p.

>>51911833
>What's the point though if it's basically impossible to detect?
Maybe for you but I've used high framerate monitors for many years and I can see screen-tearing instantly. I actually noticed it on the first round of CS:GO a few days ago because the new build of Windows 10 messed up my driver settings.
Also, I don't get ghosting outside of ULMB but really, fuck ULMB. It makes me sick too and makes everything dark as fuck.

>>51911828
Oh I see now. I never felt the differnce between vsync on and off
I just felt the 60fps more "smoothly"

>>51909980
>1.1k for one monitor
>not even 4K

>>51911817
Eizo has been selling gamer screens for years.

File: top[1].jpg (38 KB, 290x230) Image search: [Google]

38 KB, 290x230

>Dell S2716DG

anyone got this?

>>51911791
I can not find any mention of it affecting refresh rate in the specs and product sheets.

>>51911853
Why would I want a 4k or 8k display? I care more about fluidity and responsiveness than image quality. There is no 4k display that has fast reaction times and low display lag.

>>51911916
>There is no 4k display that has fast reaction times and low display lag.
Then there is no king.

>>51911927
If there is no King, I shall take the Queen.

I just want a decent 1080p 60hz IPS with a decent response time.. am i asking too much?

All the Dell Ultrasharps have really bad response times, and the Eizos are too damn expensive.

>>51911990
Check tftcentral, they do great reviews including response times and display lag.

>>51911916
>>>51911791
>I can not find any mention of it affecting refresh rate in the specs and product sheets.
So you're trying to tell me it has no trade off? Why would they even list 4ms then? I'm willing to bet it's a lightboost variant.

>>51910510
You realize you're the reason nvidia can keep being jews right?

If you don't even consider the competition, their monopoly just gets stronger.