[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Ok /G/ents you have never fail me so i ask of your advice to
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 21
Thread images: 3
Ok /G/ents you have never fail me so i ask of your advice today.

im gonna be buying a new monitor for the holidays and i cant decide between the two.
mind you they are the same price so ignore the fact that one is refurbished.I will clearly be buying this brand new. both are 4k and can do 1080p at 120hz native. will the first one needs to be overclocked to do 120hz but second one is 120hz out of the box. so which one is better and why?


http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA4JH2YW2900&cm_re=uhd420-_-9SIA4JH2YW2900-_-Product

or

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=16E-001U-00045&cm_re=vizio_p-_-16E-001U-00045-_-Product
>>
sorry for the spelling error. i meant to say while the first one need to be over clocked to 120hz.
>>
>>51894686

We are not your consumer reviews site.
>>
>>51894786
this is true but can't you help out your fellow /g/ent?
>>
both shit
>>
>>51894814
there are many many many more places to find monitor review, just google its for fucks sake.
>>
>>51894825
mind explaining why both are shit?
>>
>>51894841
i have been but i still come here for advice.
>>
>>51894686
bumping for help.
>>
>>51895416 im asking for peoples advice. if you don't have anything to bring then gtfo. im only asking for helpful people not twats like you who can't just keep scrolling when they see something they don't like.
>>
>>51895520
Viper - U're an Idiot

Also, that second link is for a god damned TV. Hope you don't mind input lag. Both of these choices suck.

>Wasabi Mango

lel

How about you don't be a fag and buy a good 1440p 144Hz monitor, which there are like dozens of, instead of half-assing it and getting a 4K chinkmade TV that kinda maybe can overclock to 120 Hz in 1080p? Use the money you saved by not being an idiot to then also purchase a real 50" 4K television screen if you actually need that.
>>
>>51895520
It says right in the rules /g/ is not your personal tech support or consumer review site. If I ignored it, I let the cancer spread and I cannot allow that.
>>
>>51895708
well i guess your parents raised you like shit. cause i was always taught if you see someone asking for help if you can then you help them.
>>
>>51895881
If you have a question, ask /sqt/.

By spoonfeeding or enabling people who break two simple rules, they'll keep coming back and shit up the board even more.
>>
File: 1444286406176.jpg (2 KB, 110x125) Image search: [Google]
1444286406176.jpg
2 KB, 110x125
>>51895520
>I wait for actual idiots to spoonfed me.
>>
File: 1429411233145.jpg (77 KB, 487x381) Image search: [Google]
1429411233145.jpg
77 KB, 487x381
>>51895881
your parents didn't teach you right if they never told you the cardinal rule of LURK MOAR
>>
>>51895689
>>51895689
lel i would be downsizing. also i have a old vizio tv that i use for my main monitor. as far as input delay i dont really notice it. also Wasabi Mango is a monitor first and foremost and tek syndicate reviewed it. here is a link if you don't believe me.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPXdOpaNUtg&list=PLmMkCgxVRzmpj6UKe6xUkMkQfcFwSDdfK&index=1
>>
>>51895961
if you're gonna bother defending it, why don't you just fucking get it you retard
>>
>>51896033
im not defending it. im just stating that i never had a problem with it. all im asking if which one is better and why? why is it so hard for you /g/ents to give a clear and concise answer without bickering and bitching?
>>
>>51896056
>why is it so hard for you /g/ents to give a clear and concise answer without bickering and bitching?
Because we don't have to. Either post this in /sqt/ or fuck off and google your questions or concerns.
>>
>>51896065
being this toxic. 2015 almost 2016 ishygddt.
Thread replies: 21
Thread images: 3

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.