Why does Firefox have to ruin everything and switch to pig disgusting GTK3?
it just gets worse and worse
GTK2 is no longer being maintained
They should've given the finger to the gnome project and switched to Qt.
I dont know please send help, everything is gross now
>>51892778
Qt is even WORSE desu
>>51892180
> dat UI
what went wrong after several years?
>>51892180
how do you get a taskbar like that?
>>51892180
>mfw gtk3 has a decade-old bug where tabs stop working randomly, if you click them it counts as if you clicked a window border instead and doesn't switch tabs
>mfw firefox is switching to gtk3
P A L E M O O N
A
L
E
M
O
O
N
>>51892180
>failfox
el oh el
use Edge senpai, its the future.
add-ons cuming soon, just like your mother because MUH DICK is wicked.
LXQt is the future
>>51892180
Whonthe fuck cares? You should have switched to palemoon already anyway.
>>51895104
tint2
>>51895137
Fuck, so that's what it is.
>>51892961
Pretty much everything. Just take a look at Firefox 2
>>51895137
>gtk3
>decade long
>>51892180
>upgrade to 43
>almost had a heart attack because it disabled my theme
>I could reactivate it without problems and it still works perfectly fine
Fucking mozilla
how do you get rid of this
>>51895137
I hate this bug... been there as long as I can remember. Never knew the cause though. Already use pale moon though so ayee.
>>51895629
Oh god i want this back
So much simpler, so much better
>>51892707
>it just gets worse and worse
>>51892721
>GTK2 is no longer being maintained
>>51892778
>They should've given the finger to the gnome project and switched to Qt.
>>51892953
>I dont know please send help, everything is gross now
>>>51892778
>Qt is even WORSE desu
>>51892961
>>>51892180 (OP)
>> dat UI
>what went wrong after several years?
>>51895104
>>>51892180 (OP)
>how do you get a taskbar like that?
>>51895137
>>>51892180 (OP)
>>mfw gtk3 has a decade-old bug where tabs stop working randomly, if you click them it counts as if you clicked a window border instead and doesn't switch tabs
>>mfw firefox is switching to gtk3
>P A L E M O O N
>A
>L
>E
>M
>O
>O
>N
>>51895161
>>>51892180 (OP)
>>failfox
>el oh el
>use Edge senpai, its the future.
>add-ons cuming soon, just like your mother because MUH DICK is wicked.
its not that bad
look at this shit with XFCE. I
>>51896182
You're just a faggot.
Spend a few minutes customizing and you can make it look however you want, even like that old POS if you REALLY wanted too.
>>51896106
Wondering this too. What the fuck is the point of it even?
>>51892180
Why does it use GTK at all? GTK is the worst.
>>51896326
Wow. How can one person miss the point so bad?
>>51896326
i'm impressed anon, you somehow made it look even worse than default!
>>51896747
Sincerely, does anyone knows a theme that doesn't look like shit on Qt? The best ones I've seen are GTK themes with the Qt theme set to GTK.
What exactly are even your issues with gtk3 and gtk in general? I'm using many applications based on that framework and its just fine.
Is SM going to commit harakiri too?
>>51896326
That looks terrible.
>>51896216
shut up, nigger palememe
>>51892180
why are you autistic and not using based chromium
What is that? Some linux shit?
>>51896242
XFCE user here, what are you doing?
>>51896106
you can if you disable titlebar searching of bookmarks\history\etc i think
>>51896742
>>51896106
Privacy section of the Options/Preferences.
Uncheck everything under 'Location Bar'.
>>51895629
>>51896182
>firefox 2 era = glorious meritocracy
>firefox now = sjw coat-tail-riding debauchery
>>51895137
F U R F A G S
U
R
F
A
G
S
>>51896326
Wow anon. I'm impressed and disgusted at the same time. Didn't know it wast technically possible to fuck up this bad.
I've literally never seen an uglier UI. Ever. That includes driver software from the XP erea.
Congratulations – you're legally retarded.
I'm still using 42. Is it worth updating? Did they even release any security updates (the only important thing to update, as far as I can tell)?
>>51896326
What the fuck is that
>>51899529
What a nice feature.
>>51899562
>>51899529
I don't even know what it means. Does anyone else want to take a gander?
Fucking.
F i n a l l y .
i
n
a
l
l
y
.
>>51892953
QT is probably the most sane framework in existence (as long as you avoid legacy stuff)
>>51899679
will still keep using youtube-dl+mpv
>>51899679
>using non free nsa botnet plugin
KDE Fiber can't come soon enough.
Which is at all, really.
>>51899820
Can't wait to see adverts again.
>>51899679
Try loading a live YouTube stream in Firefox. You can't because YouTube says that Firefox doesn't support any of the formats available.
>>51899919
Seems to work for me. I don't usually watch live things though.
>>51899919
see>>51899726
if you nuse the open with plugin with mpv and youtube-dl everything is simple
>>51899919
>>51899967
>>51899968
Try watching this video without flash:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKv90WGMtGI
>>51895161
>almost 2016
>still no extensions
>the future
heh
>>51899996
https://github.com/rg3/youtube-dl/issues/343
>>51896182
>Oh god i want this back
Seamonkey, ad essere onesti famiglia
>Using Linux
>Ever
It's your own fault.
>>51900065
Yes, but there is no reason even the youtube html player can't play it
>>51900101
actually i think there is since the only way to enable rtmpe without adding non-free software is to break the encryption.
>>51895629
That is a picture of beauty, Everything just where you need it.
Then they decide to copy chrome.
Arseholes.
>>51895629
>ugly icons
>visible file/edit/etc menu on top
>shadows
uuuuugggghhh
>>51900161
A third of the screen is taken up by panels and menus. I'm glad most of the UI is hidden away because I need it about 5% of the time.
>>51900129
info on this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_Streaming
>>51900186
>ugly icons
For you
>visible file/edit/etc menu on top
You know, so people don't have to guess what icon does what
>shadows
So people can see the different UI elements
>>51892180
>almost 2016
>not using Palemoon or Iceweasel
cute.
help
sorry for bad quality my conversion fucked up
>>51899679
>normie faggot using built-in media player
lmao
>>51900386
You know if you had minimized the terminal on the right the file size would be much smaller, right
You need to learn to adapt to new software meta when it comes to FOSS and the GNU/Linux ecosystem, rather than trying to be a luddite and hold onto old ways.
Nothing they've asked to accept so far has been ridiculous enough to not at least reluctantly accept, not Gnome3 or systemd.
You're just going to stress yourself more if you don't adapt.
>>51900244
>So people can see the different UI elements
Most people aren't partially sighted, and even for those who are, tiny shadows don't help. It just looks fuck ugly.
>>51900532
Yes it has actually, gnome3 is a retarded meme DE which sucks for normal desktop usage. Though you simply cannot stop the train of faggots shilling for it so even debian an OS that clearly should be using XFCE is using this retarded tablet interface.
Systemd would be fine if it was just another option but suddenly it took over mostly every L00nux distro with no trivial options to go back. As well as that shitty dev groups like GNOME are tying things in to systemd unnecessarily.
Going to debian again, they've been using a traditional init system which "just worked" forever now and suddenly we have this new system with no trivial option(in the installer) to choose anything else. Every distro just succumbed to RedHats shilling and tied themselves to the ship.
There are somethings I don't like about systemd(technologically) but mostly I don't like pottering and his shady/childish attitude when dealing with any individual or project who doesn't want to just jump on his bandwagon.
References: http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Arguments_against_systemd
The unix philosophy is a great one(standardized APIs with 1 tool to do 1 job well so they can easily be integrated with eachother and also be very modular) and it makes so much sense especially in the context of OSS where there are many choices it would be nice if people wouldn't be actively trying to sabotage it so you don't have to fight so hard to have things work without project Xs software.
Honestly I'd say this is likely a grab by RedHat to gain more control over the Linux ecosystem, which if I were thinking nicely would be for standardization reasons? But honestly standardized APIs are a much friendlier and more logical choice, instead of trying to bandwagon everyone into simply doing what you want them to do(stifling innovation imo).
>>51897447
Disabled it, but now I don't get any history suggestions.
I just want to remove this damn white bar.
>>51900735
https://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Installing_without_systemd
>>51900532
>You're just going to stress yourself more if you don't adapt.
>Stop resisting Goy, just take the blue pill
>>51900754
That doesn't prove anything I've said wrong if you actually read anything I said.
>>51900774
Yeah, basically. Better that then getting worked up with a futile mindset.
tl;dr resistance is futile
>>51900815
not trying to prove something, i just want to inform you that installing debian without systemd is easy.
>>51900842
If it's not an option in the installer it is not "easy", retard.
>>51900842
>https://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Installing_without_systemd
>hould one desire to install without systemd, i.e use sysvinit-core instead (old sysV5 init), it is possible to use preseed to replace systemd with sysvinit at the end of the install (This probably won't work if selecting one of the desktop environments that require systemd specific features however). If using a preseed file already, just make sure to set the preseed value
preseed/late_command="in-target apt-get install -y sysvinit-core"
If not using a preseed file, this can be added to the boot arguments instead by hitting TAB at the boot menu on the desired entry and appending the above preseed line at the end of the boot command.
There may still be a few bits of systemd installed, but at least init itself is not systemd and cleaning up any remaining pieces should not be too hard.
this is not "easy" - for an advanced user, sure, but how the fuck would my grandma figure that out? She has no first-hand experience with GRUB...
Then again, my grandma wouldn't give a fuck about SystemD in the first place, and would instead use a genuinely good OS like Windows or OS X anyway
>>51900896
>using one command during install is hard
>>51896242
>not ricing xfce
>>51896326
beautiful
>>51897850
>that font rendering
>>51900842
>Going to debian again, they've been using a traditional init system which "just worked" forever now and suddenly we have this new system with no trivial option(in the installer) to choose anything else
>with no trivial option(in the installer) to choose anything else
No shilling.
