[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Speccy thread:richfag edition
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 142
Thread images: 57
File: titla.png (102 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
titla.png
102 KB, 1024x768
Speccy thread:richfag edition
>>
>>51880308
Ummm....
>>
>>51880334
it's okay to be jelly (x
>>
Install ublock origin you asshole
>>
>>51880308
Keep wasting your money richfag. I'm perfectly fine with my 383
>>
File: 44 euro tablet.png (160 KB, 600x1024) Image search: [Google]
44 euro tablet.png
160 KB, 600x1024
This is my really expensive tablet. It almost cost 50€
>>
File: IMG_20151213_194523.jpg (2 MB, 2592x1944) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20151213_194523.jpg
2 MB, 2592x1944
>>51880427
Also has some very interesting BIOS options. I wonder what would happen if I changed this setting.
>>
Does this count as richfag?
>>
>>51880489
>shitty monitors
>OS probably installed on HDD even though you have an SSD
>>
File: Untitled.png (38 KB, 749x562) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
38 KB, 749x562
Which one should I upgrade to
FX-8320 or FX-8350?
>>
>>51880538
8320, 8350 is just an overclocked 8320 and therefore a waste of money when you can just set the multiplier / volts up in the bios manually for the same / better performance
>>
File: 2bhlad..png (105 KB, 1280x800) Image search: [Google]
2bhlad..png
105 KB, 1280x800
My daily for the last 6 years.
>>
>>51880567
thanks, thats kind of what i thought too
all I want is decent frames in csgo, so 8320 should suffice
>>
>>51880505
OS is on my SSD. Monitors are shitty because they were free so I didn't bother spending more dosh on newer ones.
>>
File: speccy1.png (200 KB, 1065x753) Image search: [Google]
speccy1.png
200 KB, 1065x753
>>51880489
no, this does though
>>
File: specs.png (34 KB, 741x491) Image search: [Google]
specs.png
34 KB, 741x491
>>51880308
i5 4690k OC @ 4.4GHz
>>
File: screen.png (40 KB, 714x532) Image search: [Google]
screen.png
40 KB, 714x532
I'm the richest fag on this board
>>
>>51880577
That would probably run better with Vista or 7
>>
>>51880643
>consumer laptop
>>
File: 491.jpg (12 KB, 179x282) Image search: [Google]
491.jpg
12 KB, 179x282
>>51880638
>seagate
>>
>>51880678
Thanks bro
>>
>>51880684
meme
>>
File: speccy-2015.jpg (59 KB, 889x515) Image search: [Google]
speccy-2015.jpg
59 KB, 889x515
how well would Fallout run?
>>
File: Capture.png (40 KB, 798x483) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
40 KB, 798x483
>>
File: ucantbeatme.jpg (46 KB, 669x526) Image search: [Google]
ucantbeatme.jpg
46 KB, 669x526
You can't beat me faggots
>>
File: speccy yo v3.png (51 KB, 1063x679) Image search: [Google]
speccy yo v3.png
51 KB, 1063x679
>>51880592

Bonus option if the price is right: 8320e due to the lower voltage it needs - simply clock it up as high as you can cool it.
>>
>>51880777
>1.428v
Wow, that is bad.
Enjoy your heat and deteriorating hardware

On my 8350, I hit over 5ghz under 1.4v a while back
And 5.5ghz on 1.55v a while back
http://valid.x86.fr/6tp121

Don't advocate these kind of unsafe overclocks to people. 1.4v is high, and 1.43 even higher. Not that short runs will do anything, but for 1.43v I would expect 5.0ghz easily.
>>
>>51880711
>gayming laptop
Fucking reatrd
>>
File: Capture.png (44 KB, 813x561) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
44 KB, 813x561
>>
>>51881186
I use it for digital media and Adobe Suite, 3dsmax, Rhino, etc. I'm an architect student.
>>
>>51880308
>richfag edition
>posts an average pc
kek
>>
>>51880711
Torrent it and try it out faggot
It's unoptimized shit so it'll run just not amazing.
>>
>>51881278
>someone who actually invested in his studies by getting a decent laptop
You dun good bro. Most people skimp on computer-related stuff.
>>
>>51880308
We use the same theme anon
>>
>>51881232
>Z97A
>4790K
>780 Ti
Are you me? Also, nice stock cooler senpai
>>
>>51881278
How's the battery life?
>>
>>51880665
it doesn't actually
>>
File: MuhSpex.png (88 KB, 809x614) Image search: [Google]
MuhSpex.png
88 KB, 809x614
>>
>>51880638
What voltage did you set to get to 4.4
>>
File: specs.png (157 KB, 1086x629) Image search: [Google]
specs.png
157 KB, 1086x629
I'm rich af desu
>>
File: 1.png (47 KB, 861x703) Image search: [Google]
1.png
47 KB, 861x703
>>
>>51881875
>980 Ti
For what pvrpose
>>
>>51882065
144hz monitor

also why the hell not?
>>
File: i9 at idle.png (2 KB, 304x58) Image search: [Google]
i9 at idle.png
2 KB, 304x58
>>51880308

can't beat my i9
>>
>>51882123
id like to see how that does after an hour of prime95
>>
File: Untitled.png (254 KB, 1366x768) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
254 KB, 1366x768
>>
File: currentspeccy.jpg (59 KB, 558x389) Image search: [Google]
currentspeccy.jpg
59 KB, 558x389
Some of these make me not feel bad about my build which is over 2 years old now.

Been thinking about a fresh build though but just doesn't seem like hardware has really made big enough jumps that much of my stuff is too outdated.
Might just get new monitors, and a new 2-3TB HDD.
>>
>>51881469
stock cooler on which?

It doesn't show but the cpu is at 4.7 ghz

Stock cooler on the GPU though.
>>
File: Capture.png (39 KB, 664x449) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
39 KB, 664x449
yeah i'm a super rich fag.
>>
File: Screenshot 2015-12-15 16.10.08.png (46 KB, 775x573) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot 2015-12-15 16.10.08.png
46 KB, 775x573
Am I Cool enough?
>>
>>51882288
>46 at idle
nigguh you best be alt tabbed out of a game or have like 3 monitors
>>
>>51882249
>>51882288
Man, if you guys are so rich, where are your raid 0 setups?
>>
>>51882308
I live in the carribean, so it's kind of hot, like always.
>>
>>51882322
>not having a separate storage server.
>>
File: img.png (113 KB, 500x394) Image search: [Google]
img.png
113 KB, 500x394
real richfag here xD
>>
File: hi.png (42 KB, 662x526) Image search: [Google]
hi.png
42 KB, 662x526
faggets.
>>
>>51882329
damn dude that sucks. you ever try setting custom fan curves using msi afterburner?
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (92 KB, 675x525) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.jpg
92 KB, 675x525
a big upgrade from an amd fx 4xxx line. well satisfied with the performance.
>>
>>51882364
wel memd
>>
>>51882363
I could try. But it sure would make it a bit louder and since the case is right beside me. 46c is that hot for idle, anyway?
>>
>>51882363
>. you ever try setting custom fan curves using msi afterburner?
im gaming :P
>>
>>51882201
What the fuck is that thing
>>
File: 1446929530464.png (106 KB, 1008x1216) Image search: [Google]
1446929530464.png
106 KB, 1008x1216
>>51882359

>780ti

How's that 7970 performance treating you?
>>
>>51882415
honestly it is a bit high. what are your temps under load? thats what really matters the most
>>
File: i7speccy.png (249 KB, 453x532) Image search: [Google]
i7speccy.png
249 KB, 453x532
>tfw poor but still have a decent computer
>>
>>51882418
What thing?
>>
File: 1338054174611.gif (2 MB, 250x158) Image search: [Google]
1338054174611.gif
2 MB, 250x158
>>51882443
>970
>3.5+0.5
>>
>>51882487
it doesn't go beyond 70c at 100% usage
>>
File: temps.png (47 KB, 967x556) Image search: [Google]
temps.png
47 KB, 967x556
Are my temps ok?
>>
>>51882527
Im gaming!
>>
File: Crysis_01.png (102 KB, 597x781) Image search: [Google]
Crysis_01.png
102 KB, 597x781
>>51882443
you wot
>>
>>51882527
what are they like under load?
>>
>>51882511
thats not too bad. Even with a slight fan curve you could bring that down a bit
>>
>>51882624
I'll see what I can do I. Thanks anon.
>>
>>51882611
Yes im playing gta 5 right now (ultra settings)
>>
File: 2015-12-15_15-39-41.png (230 KB, 1400x652) Image search: [Google]
2015-12-15_15-39-41.png
230 KB, 1400x652
I don't know why Speccy always reports my CPU temps as wrong as they are.
>>
File: Bildschirmfoto.png (440 KB, 1280x1024) Image search: [Google]
Bildschirmfoto.png
440 KB, 1280x1024
>>
File: farcry4_2560_1440.png (28 KB, 500x610) Image search: [Google]
farcry4_2560_1440.png
28 KB, 500x610
>>51882592

There is a reason why older benchmarks match yours and newer ones have them closer to my chart. These days a 780 (non ti) is often competing against a 7970.

Even in this pic a 280x isn't the mile behind a 780ti it should be.
>>
>>51882592
Good job posting a nvidia title that LITERALLY renders an extremely tessellated INVISIBLE OCEAN under the player model to abuse the fact the nvidia penalty is 10~20% of the average fps, vs 30~40% (amd's).
>>
File: speccy.png (50 KB, 860x724) Image search: [Google]
speccy.png
50 KB, 860x724
dual cpu reporting in
>>
>>51882640
when you alt tab out your temps are going to drop to normal idle temps so thats not accurate
>>
>>51882694

The tessellated ocean is crysis 2, not 3.
>>
>>51880308
more like latino edition
>>
>>51882657

Speccy will report sub ambient temps for FX chips because speccy cannot into AMD's sensor (which I believe is the same on their newer chips as well).
>>
>>51882706
How much does such a setup cost today? The CPUs are 6 years old now so they should not be that expensive.
>>
>>51882801
most expensive bit was the motherboard
cpu's are peanuts, those ones were either $40 each or $20 each
>>
>>51882801
Had my Intel core 2 duo E7500 for 5 euros, so yeah its cheap
>>
>>51882913
Yeah, but who wants a C2D these days
>>
File: Schermopname (124).png (56 KB, 796x537) Image search: [Google]
Schermopname (124).png
56 KB, 796x537
SUPER RICH
>>
>>51882693
These charts could also be different clocks. Not to mention the 380X is a SLIGHT bit better than the 7970, and it's price reflects that.

I'm not saying a 780 ti wasn't rediculously expensive when it came out, but used nowadays you can get them for a similar price as a 380X
>>
File: spec.png (39 KB, 674x532) Image search: [Google]
spec.png
39 KB, 674x532
>>51880308
Step aside, plebeian.
>>
File: Speccy B85.jpg (45 KB, 608x442) Image search: [Google]
Speccy B85.jpg
45 KB, 608x442
Poorfag build I put together out of mostly spare parts/free/on sale parts. Going to a friend of mine who got a used 280x to pop in it.
>>
File: poorfaggotry.png (35 KB, 660x526) Image search: [Google]
poorfaggotry.png
35 KB, 660x526
>>51880308
I'm poor as fuck, /g/.
>>
>>51883114
How do you only h ave a 2GB 980 ti?
>>
>>51882974

Thats missing the point - the 780ti should be competing against a 290x when it clearly isn't anymore. You shouldn't be able to get a 7970/280x even close to reference clocked 780ti performance as thats two whole tiers of performance above it. Remember: the 7970 existed to dethrone a 680.
>>
File: Untitled2.png (35 KB, 710x539) Image search: [Google]
Untitled2.png
35 KB, 710x539
Not as rich as some of you. Still pick up $1500 Ultra Gaming Rigs on CL erryday.
>>
>>51883158
But how can that be, When the 780 ti was beating the 970 in benchmarks when the 970 was released, and every chart you've linked has it sitting above the 780 ti?

I bet it has something to do with the 3GB limitations when the 380x has 4GB

And if that's the case then 1080p benchmarks would reflect that, and 1440p benchmarks of newer games would obviously bring them closer.
>>
File: 2656279.png (81 KB, 635x970) Image search: [Google]
2656279.png
81 KB, 635x970
>>51883273

No 780ti, but the 280x is nibbling on a 970. Tahiti truly is GOAT.
>>
File: Speccy.png (21 KB, 636x542) Image search: [Google]
Speccy.png
21 KB, 636x542
As long as you don't count my water cooling kit i'm middle class
>>
>>51883307
Do you think this has something to do with mantle? the 290x clearly competed with the 780 ti before, but not now. I guess AMD just nailed it with their software updates.
>>
>>51883332

Given the game does not support mantle I do not believe that is a factor. I also severely doubt AMD nailed their driver updates to that degree so there is clearly something else going on.
>>
>>51883360
Oh well, honestly I'm still happy with mine. Tbh I was going to get a 290x 2 years ago but this was when they just came out and were on back order for months because of mining. 780 ti was in stock and it was a very generous gift.

I don't play many graphic intensive games anymore anyways, and if I was I'd save up and get a Titan X because triple monitor gaming
>>
>>51883140
i have one as well and for somereason it shows the same on speccy, but on everything else it shows the full amount
>>
>>51881186
>>51881186
fuck that shit, who cares what it's branded to do, the specs are fucking high. also not me you replied to.

>>51881342
this guy gets it

if I'm getting a laptop, I want it to last. the ROG badge does not negate specs.
>>
File: speccy.png (85 KB, 751x924) Image search: [Google]
speccy.png
85 KB, 751x924
Do I count?
>>
>>51881888
1.25
>>
>>51880489
>4790k
>780ti
>those displays
>almost 2016
Sure anon... You're rich...
>>
File: specceh.png (53 KB, 816x717) Image search: [Google]
specceh.png
53 KB, 816x717
Do I count?
>>
>>51883473
>ROG badge does not negate specs.
It does negate battery life
You know, the reason why I want a laptop is for mobile usage
>>
File: specs and cores.png (42 KB, 646x491) Image search: [Google]
specs and cores.png
42 KB, 646x491
>>51880610
>that Intel SSD 750 1.2TB
How's it treating you friend. Thinking about getting one as well.
>>
File: xp_bitches.jpg (179 KB, 1280x1024) Image search: [Google]
xp_bitches.jpg
179 KB, 1280x1024
yeeeeeeeeeah motherbitches come fuck with me!
>>
File: erferv.png (17 KB, 472x343) Image search: [Google]
erferv.png
17 KB, 472x343
>>51883537
you could cut back on that voltage and save you some heat
>>
>>51880308
Learn how to screenshot focused windows and maybe you will find a job.
>>
File: nt4heater.png (47 KB, 868x463) Image search: [Google]
nt4heater.png
47 KB, 868x463
>>51883685
>his shitbox can even run Speccy at all
disqualified desu
>>
>>51883776
Install win2k, then you can run the first release of speccy
>>
>>51883685
hows the third world treating you, anon
>>
>>51883685
At least get a Geforce 6
>>
File: Screenshot (5).png (358 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot (5).png
358 KB, 1920x1080
no gpu I know this but here I am.
>>
>>51884225
>INTERNET EXPLORER
>WMP
>retarded scaling
What the fuck are you doing
>>
>>51884288
im using a 42inch tv for monitor. whats wrong with explorer?
>>
>>51884350
>whats wrong with explorer?
What the fuck are you doing on this website?
>>
>>51884366
>>51884288
enjoying your digits, help me out faggot. what do I DO??? you make me feel 2 inches tall
>>
>>51884395
1. Lurk more
2. LURK MORE, SERIOUSLY
3. Read our wiki: https://wiki.installgentoo.com/index.php/Main_Page
>>
>>51884418
fuck your Gentoo bullshit, and im trying to lurk here and ask a few questions but I get these responses. should I be using firefox instead?
>>
>>51884463
Chrome.
>>
>>51883787
nt4 is too cozy
there's nothing like the feeling of accomplishment I get when you manage to install software without breaking the system
>>
>>51884463
wew lad
As I said, lurk more before posting
https://wiki.installgentoo.com/index.php/Web_browsers
>>
>>51882138
Prime 95 celcius, kek
>>
>>51884522
are you a digits wizard? im very new to internet shite, thanks for the help friend.
>>
File: FHARQWEHET.png (34 KB, 657x444) Image search: [Google]
FHARQWEHET.png
34 KB, 657x444
Should I buy an i5 4590 with shit mobo or R9 380 4GB and PSU?
>>
File: speccy 4930K.png (741 KB, 1440x900) Image search: [Google]
speccy 4930K.png
741 KB, 1440x900
>>51880308
more like speccy thread: animu edishon
>>
File: spec.png (70 KB, 675x529) Image search: [Google]
spec.png
70 KB, 675x529
surprised how many people fell for the win10 meme
>>
File: Untitled2.png (40 KB, 880x573) Image search: [Google]
Untitled2.png
40 KB, 880x573
>>
>>51884619
Surprised how many people can live without virtual desktops with specs like this ;>
>>
File: Untitled.png (1 MB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
1 MB, 1920x1080
>>
>>51884805

I'm surprised people can live without SPINNAN CUBEZ.
>>
>>51884805
>windows 10 invented virtual desktops
You could get them since windows 95. With an MS tool.
>>
File: shick.jpg (88 KB, 741x446) Image search: [Google]
shick.jpg
88 KB, 741x446
Yep, rich as a jew.

Good laptop though.
>>
>>
>>51883828

funny you mention it, I have been looking at either a Geforce 6200 or trying to find an ATI Radeon HD2600 or better PCI card. The machine doesn't have an AGP slot on it which severely limits what I can get for it.

If I can find one, an HD2600 has GPU based H264 video acceleration so at the very least I can watch video without it being a slideshow.
>>
>>51883808

pretty well. This is the machine I use 50% of the time for my consulting business. The other 50% of the time it's a WinXP VM on my laptop.
>>
File: 1355739283325.jpg (237 KB, 1100x1380) Image search: [Google]
1355739283325.jpg
237 KB, 1100x1380
>>51882000
checked
Thread replies: 142
Thread images: 57

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.