Why aren't you programming in pure C89?
>>51857080
Because C++14 makes lots of things faster to implement at expense of minor performance losses.
>>51857080
But I do.
>>51857080
Advantage of doing so? Every relevant platform has a compiler that can compile a newer ISO standard of C.
Because I like declaring my control variable within my for loop.
>>51857323
Windows isn't a relevant platform?
MSVC barely added C99 support recently.
>>51857080
>Why aren't you programming in pure C89?
Because it is 2015. And we have C#.
> tfw using glorious gnu99
feels good man
>>51857367
/thread
I do because I'm a real engineer.
If you're not programming embedded systems you're doing monkey work and Indians will have your job by 2017.
/thread
>>51857273
>Performance loss
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>51857080
>C89
