Ignorant faggot here
Who are the neutral and lawful evil in this picture?
Neutral: John Carmack
Lawful Evil: Eric Schmidt
Neutral: Linus Torvalds
Lawful Evil: Bjarne Stroustrup
Neutral: Tim Berners-Lee
Lawful Evil: Lennart Poettering
Who's Lawful Good?
>>51775079
dmr
>>51775079
Dennis Ritchie, C inventor
Stallman must be Lawful Good, I know nobody who stand up to his lofty principles more than him
>>51775079
Anyone have the Ritchie vs Jobs image?
>>51774950
[Dennis Ritchie] [Bill Gates] [Linus Torvalds]
[Richard Stallman] [John Carmack] [Steve Ballmer]
[Eric Schmidt] [Mark Zuckerberg] [Steve Jobs]
Also, why the fuck is Gates "Good"? He's a piece of shit.
>>51774950
Why is Jobs Chaotic Evil and not Lawful Evil?
His entire view on computers is to control their hardware and software.
>>51775143
My main gripe as well... Looks like whoever made this picture seems to be too young to remember everything he did before he retired and started giving away the billions he had made by screwing people over.
>>51775169
My guess is that Eric Schmidt was even more lawful evil as he's running a business built on collecting data on people and ether selling that data or using it to display targeted ads.
>>51775169
How is that evil? In some cases (and most of Apple's) it works in their and the customers favour.
>>51775169
OP here
Before I knew the bottom left was Schmidt and the true neutral was carmack, I would have put gates at chaotic evil, and jobs at lawful evil. Now I don't know what to think because I think neutral evil could be Schmidt or zuckerberg
>>51775218
Good point, I just don't see him as chaotic
>>51775218
Regardless of if he's evil, good, or neutral, he's not chaotic is my point
>>51775238
I think maybe whoever was in charge of Android development should be chaotic
>Bill Gates
>Good
>>51775169
because jobs constantly shot the foot because of his own obsessions while schmidt is a platonic vilain who will not let his self dominate his domination plans; just look at the motherfucker's face.
>>51775308
>the robin hood of personal computing
>anything but good
don't be a pleb. that guy must've been a blast to hang around with in the MS golden years before he was married and had children
>>51775048
Thanks King Fedora
>>51775048
>>51775048
Thanks king fedora
>>51774950
Yeah, it's more like this.
>>51774950
>hurr zuckerberg is evil
Butthurt liberal arts major detected.
desu senpai
>>51774950
>>51775079
Fuck off.
>>51775996
This.
much ore accurate than OP picture.
>thinking Bill Gate is good
>Stallman neutral and not good
Who's the retard that made the first one ?
>>51774950
How does one be Chaotically good?
>>51775048
>Neutral: Tim Berners-Lee
>Lawful Evil: Lennart Poettering
Thanks king fedora!
>chaotic good
>anyone but snowden
are you daft?
Bill Gates is "good evil"
>here, let me set mainstream computing back 20 years
>and keep africans alive
Nah, maybe lawful evil
>>51778143
chaotic good ? snowden ?
I'll put him lawful good.
He did everything he could to help citizens, risking his life for us. How that's chaotic ? Chaotic would be to erase all the data the NSA have.
>>51775048
Thanks king fedora
>>51778171
Well he did sort of cause the biggest PR disaster in history and he can't show his face in any country that isn't on completely hostile terms with the United States unless he wants to end up being waterboarded to death at a CIA blacksite.
>>51776046
>defending zuckerBERG
Gee, what ethnoreligious group could -you- possibly belong to
Who is the chaotic neutral guy?
>>51778171
he cant be lawfull
he didn’t check what he publicised and that resulted in good/innocent people getting hurt
if he had filtered out things like locations/names of vulnerable people in unstable countries than maybe
>>51778171
Abandoning your leaders is the very opposite of what a Lawful Good does. Even if they know what they're doing is wrong they follow their orders to the best of their abilities.
>>51774950
>>51778171
>lawful good
a wanted fugitive living under russian asylum you mean. chaotic good obviously
>>51778263
the Sugar Mountain people celebrating the Fourth Day
>>51779751
leonard potter should be in his own category called "misguided evil"
>>51774996
more like good bjarne stroustrup
rich tea, maybe i can be your gf for tonight, le nvidia man
creator of loonix, autism megatexture man, sweaty ballmer
jewgle, kike "they trust me, dumb fucks" fuckerberg, "smoothies will cure my cancer" quote - man dead from cancer
>>51779841
i guess he means well, but he seems to make things that work, work, work, catch fire, ask for a break, ignore what you tell it, then work again
Got too tired, couldn't change one of the ballmers
>>51775996
this is definitely an improvement, except that cunt tesla faggot doesn't belong with the greats just because he's a capitalist degenerate gambler
>>51774950
bill gates and john carmack should be swapped desu
>>51779751
Lawful Good
>Grace Hopper
>Dennis Ritchie
>Niklaus Wirth
>Donald Knuth
Neutral Good
>Linus Torvalds
>rms
>Larry Wall
Chaotic Good
>Aaron Swartz
>Ed Snowden
Lawful Neutral
>Paul Graham
>Current Bill Gates
>Early Sergey Brin/Larry Page
>Guido van Rossum
>Rob Pike
True Neutral
>Woz
>John Carmack
Chaotic Neutral
>John Romero
>John McAfee
>Terry Davis
>Eric Raymond
Lawful Evil
>80s-90s Bill Gates
>Steve Jobs
>Eric Schmitt
>Modern Sergey Brin/Larry Page
Neutral Evil
>John Von Neumann
>Mark Zuckerberg
Chaotic Evil
>Steve "Sweaty" Ballmer
>>51780006
Snowden is extremely lawful good, not chaotic good.
He has a personal moral code that he absolutely refuses to infringe upon, which is why he did what he did. Lawful good refers to having a personal set of ideals that one ALWAYS follows in order to do good, not whether one follows the written law of the land.
That being said, someone who is chaotic good tries to be a good person but in ways that aren't heavily structured by any sort of specific moral code.
>>51780006
>Lawful Commie
>RMS
actually, i agree with the sentiment
His ideals are not really communist though, he has some odd spins on different things.
Since he is against "protections" of software by licensing, he is essentially making it so that everyone has what they need, which is in the communist ideal, but he does not favor ownership of any real sort, so is not centralized like the political ideal normally is understood
Basically it is summed up as
>Traditional political ideals do not relate to software.
>Politics deal with distributing finite resources, where software is infinitely copyable
>>51780083
I second this.
>>51780083
why the everloving fuck is john carmack neutral instead of good?
>>51775048
Thanks king fedora
Islam tips chin to you
>>51775996
What makes Ritchie and better than Gates or Jobs? Unix was just as restrictive as anything Microsoft and Apple have brought out (it's why GNU and BSD exist).
It's only because Unix predates brand loyalty and consumer cults that everyone wanks over him.
>>51775079
gr8 b8 m8
>>51780522
It is the fact that the system is the forefather of Linux and BSD and such. The restrictions was from the company, not the workers.
The people working on the system are fantastic people who had a culture very different than the corporate asses who added the shackles to the system
>>51780199
Autistic graphics programmer turbonerd, only really cared about things that interested himself, medium sociopath (got better though)
