Net Analyzer
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Post your net analyzer results.
http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/
It seems it doesn't matter what DNS resolver I use, I always get slow lookups.(800ms+) I want to see if I'm the only one.
Bump?
guess people are too lazy to run it
>>51749147
Why would anyone download this? If it was an online one sure, but you really think a bunch of people are going to download something from a 4chan link?
Even if it is safe, most people just won't care enough.
>>51749166
I think it did have an online version, but it requires java to be enabled.(i was too lazy to enable it, so I used the cli version).
ah well
>>51749220
If there was an online one sure, that'd be easy. I couldn't find one anywhere on the website.
This might help you out too maybe, it's a new/updated version of Namebench. A google tool for checking issues with DNS.
http://www.spaceman.ca/blog/?p=311
So I forgot Chrome doesn't support NPAPI plugins anymore, so that's why there was no link. I tested it out in Firefox and got clean results, no issues.
>>51749268
thanks, trying now.
I'm using DNScrypt + OpenNIC, so hopefully thats not what is impacting it.
>>51749349
Damn.
Maybe I need to give my ISP a call then. something is clearly wrong.
Is that Wifi or Ethernet?
>>51749368
Wired, and on a fairly fast connection.
http://n1.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/summary/id=43ca253f-28118-5e973dde-2f13-421
3-99a8
IPv6 things are due to me not caring enough to fool with pfsense
clock could be wangblows being slow
>>51749421
>Wired
Maybe that's a factor. I'm forced to use wifi, but my dns shouldnt be this slow. One of the tests said 1900ms once. (namebench isnt done yet) my actual speeds aren't bad though. I can download at 4600kb/s from torrents and such
>>51749476
are you use your default dns?
>>51748995
>Netalyzr works on any computer with a Java
dropped
>>51749552
I'm using google's dns, but I think I have it set to use comcast's dns first
I don't know if I set it up to cache dns or not though
>>51749606
>>51749421
Looks like I was right.
The problem was indeed because of Dnscrypt. I was using it to prevent dns leaks.
>>51749147
I don't want to install Java.
>If you don't see a big "Start Analysis" link,
please see the FAQ for details on how to enable Java.
LOL_nope.jpg
