[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
The year is 2015. The month, December. The day, Monday. The
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 50
Thread images: 13
File: Linux.jpg (91 KB, 1280x1509) Image search: [Google]
Linux.jpg
91 KB, 1280x1509
The year is 2015.

The month, December.

The day, Monday.

The date, the 7th.

The status of thumbnails in the most popular Linux distros' file selectors: Nonexistent.
>>
>>51734923
not true, though the gnome open files dialog box and drag and drop are both literally shit.

But nautilus in general has thumbnails.
>>
>>51734942
Screenshot?
>>
File: 490.jpg (48 KB, 627x626) Image search: [Google]
490.jpg
48 KB, 627x626
>>51734923
See this shitty post about this issue already

>>51734866

Also, LFS faggot. Do it yourself
>>
>>51734958
google sushi nautilus

it also works for the xfce file browser. I imagine KDE also has thumbnails, and probably unity and cinnamon too.
>>
>>51734942
>>51735030
>confusing file selector with file browser
>>
>>this bait again
>>using a de
Get out.
Trendshill
>>
>>51734923
Even though it IS the current year?
>>
>>51735160
Where is the bait, exactly?
>>
File: e50.png (28 KB, 625x626) Image search: [Google]
e50.png
28 KB, 625x626
>>51735204
>>
This is legit the reason I switched back to Windows. I don't use my PC for much else than posting here.
>>
File: topkek.png (313 KB, 423x500) Image search: [Google]
topkek.png
313 KB, 423x500
>>51735296
>switching to windows because of one feature
topkek
>>
File: Gloriouskdefilepicker.png (227 KB, 1008x736) Image search: [Google]
Gloriouskdefilepicker.png
227 KB, 1008x736
>>
>>51735370
A paramount feature when you're main use is posting with images
>>
>>51735426

> 2010+4
> not realizing 4chan has been bought out by the same company that own reddit
> still posting here

Head over to 8 ch m8
>>
>>51735426
I'm using Ubuntu, and Firefox works fine for me with thumbnails.
>>
>>51735525
Screenshot?
>>
File: Screenshot-8.png (335 KB, 1600x900) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot-8.png
335 KB, 1600x900
>>51734923
>The status of thumbnails in the most popular Linux distros' file selectors: Nonexistent.

But that's wrong, you fucking retard.
>>
>>51735542
Wow that looks disgusting and you should be ashamed of yourself
>>
>>51735296
Open the file in Nautilus and drag it onto the upload field, makes literally no difference in effort.
>>
>>51735542
The large image on the right is an image preview, not a thumbnail. The small icons are not big enough to discern subtle differences in images and thus are not thumbnails either.

A reminder that the purpose of a thumbnail is to allow the user to be able to quickly select an image without needing to click for previews.
>>
>>51735542
Absolutely fucking horrid looking
>>
>>51735563
>mac user criticizing aesthetics

lolol, OK, m8. Enjoy that Fisher Price look you have.

>inb4 "hurr durr, I use Windows"

My point still stands.
>>
>>51735599
I use CRUX faggot
>>
>>51734923
>The status of thumbnails in the most popular Linux distros' file selectors: Nonexistent.
first world problem
>>
File: CRUX_screenshot.jpg (120 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
CRUX_screenshot.jpg
120 KB, 1024x768
>>51735604
>I use CRUX

topkek. pic related, source Wikipedia.
>>
>>51735659
At least it's not ALL BLACK
>>
>>51735659
>Implying this picture of KDE from like 2002
You realize that I can install any DE/WM that I want right
>>
>>51735688
>Implying this picture of KDE from like 2002 proves anything
Is what I meant to type
>>
File: you must be new here.png (2 MB, 1503x1080) Image search: [Google]
you must be new here.png
2 MB, 1503x1080
>>51735683
Darker colors are easier on the eyes for those of us who spend a lot of time in front of a screen.

Besides, I like to think of it as an "industrial" look. Function over form.

You don't like it? Set yours up differently.

Screaming about how much you dislike my GUI theme choices on a Japanese imageboard is pure autism.

It makes about as much sense as throwing a tantrum because you don't like someone's desktop background pic.
>>
>>51735744
Your shit literally looks worse than stock Windows XP
>>
>>51735763
Found the applefag
>>
>>51735770
No I'm still the CRUX guy
>>
>>51735744
Emo twat
>>
File: Emo Philips.jpg (67 KB, 525x600) Image search: [Google]
Emo Philips.jpg
67 KB, 525x600
>>51735784
Emo Philips.
>>
>>51735816
Who are you quoting?
>>
>>51735816
This might be intentional but Zizi is literally French for "willy".
>>
>>51735842
What do you use thumbnails for?
>>
>>51735577
>The small icons are not big enough to discern subtle differences in images and thus are not thumbnails either.
Oh boy, its the good old "im redefining the word thumbnails" bait again.
>>
File: CRUX guy.jpg (177 KB, 1680x1050) Image search: [Google]
CRUX guy.jpg
177 KB, 1680x1050
Found a screenshot of CRUX guy's desktop.
>>
>>51735870
Not that guy, but
Redefining or not, the thumbnails in the default GTK picker is still too small
>>
>>51735908
Yeah, pity it's not open source so you could change that.

Oh, wait...
>>
>>51735919
That's the issue here though. Its not that easily changed.
>>
>>51735919
Wow you're a retard
>>
C
U
R
R
E
N
T

Y
E
A
R
>>
File: 100120123.png (292 KB, 748x684) Image search: [Google]
100120123.png
292 KB, 748x684
>>51735577
>>51735863
It doesn't matter if the content of a picture is ``discernible'' or not, thumbnails are small preview pictures of images, that's it. Any other "definition" is stupid bait and bullshit.
>>
>>51735542
Reminds me of 2007.
>>
File: scr.png (327 KB, 1107x645) Image search: [Google]
scr.png
327 KB, 1107x645
At least linux has video thumbnails.. unlike my stoopid mac.
>>
File: thumbnails.webm (832 KB, 1123x1014) Image search: [Google]
thumbnails.webm
832 KB, 1123x1014
>>
>>51736144
How though?
Thread replies: 50
Thread images: 13

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.