Lol you Ramdisk noobs.
Heres what you do, you dont turn your shit ram into a harddrive. you turn your SSD into Raid 0 then make them into virtual ram.
330GB of ram allmost as fast as my pys ram.
>>51530369
bait or too retarded to realize that ram is much faster than 1k MB/s write and read
>>51530496
also write cycles
>>51530369
>allmost as fast as pys ram
DDR4-2133 has a peak throughput of around 17000 MB/s
>>51530496
no you fail to understand, with this much ram you get the full use of your multicore cpu, since you can load data. the speed is not that important, but its like what 1/3 of the speed of a normal ram chip. but if you multiply it with the amount of cores in your cpu it becomes much more powerfull.
>>51530536
Didn't notice you had DDR3-1333. That has a max throughput of around 10000 MB/s.
>>51530570
Do you understand how caching and memory buses works? You've basically made a massive swap disk.
>>51530629
well, that was the idea, but to make a fast swap disk.
heres my speed test on my ram.
>>51530660
slowest ass ram, even then it's still THREE TIMES faster than ssd.
>>51530705
but i get 20 times more ram for the same price
>>51530785
why?
>>51530369
>allmost as fast as my pys ram
Unless that shit's from 1996 they your ram's fucking slow m8
>>51530570
3/10 bait
might catch someone
>>51530855
no thats my SSD speed turned into virtual ram
>>51530369
>>51530874
He already caught some fresh ones.
>>51530881
doesn't change anything he said
1GBps is absolute dogshit.
especially compared to modern RAM.
>>51530881
If (1GB/s) is "allmost as fast as my pys ram" then "your ram (which is < (2x(1GB/s)))'s fucking slow m8"
Your average SSD is at least 10 times slower than your ram, pretty dumb this idea of yours OP, I'm sure you can find smth else to come here and try to get some self-esteem by flexing it.
>>51530369
>RAID 0
enjoy still being bottlenecked by the slow ass SATA bus and losing everything when whatever shitty SSD you cheaper out on eventually eats shit
>>51530369
That's not even as fast as DDR3, also the latency must be mounstrosly high
That's without even considering wear in the SSD's
Holy shit just gb2/v/
>>51531016
a normal ssd will be able to handel 3petabytes of data easy. thats close to 1 terabyte everyday for 10 years. on top of that you got 5 year warranty on the drive it self. its impossible to brake. and if you do you get a new one.
>>51530369
You fucking moron you obviously have no idea about memory management. First of all RAM is way faster, not only in terms of transfer rate which is more than 20k mb in dual channel for ddr3 1333 but also in terms of latency. Second of all your cpu won't be able to prefetch from your fucking virtual ram which makes it even slower.
>>51531195
that might be true for singel core.
but when you use 8 cores. and each core write to the ram, you start getting issues.
but when you use virtual ram, you page ram and the cpu cores wont over page each other on the ram, since you have such a massive amount. the important thing is to feed the cpu with data, not make it que your ram into a waiting line. if you had any idea on how a modern Cpu bus system worked, you would understand this.
>>51531253
Are you stupid or something? Do you even know how caching works? Do you know what a fucking MMU is? Your virtual RAM is useless here
>>51531253
You don't have any idea of what you're talking about, most multi threaded workloads aren't that memory intensive to get performance improvements from more memory, even then just using more ram instead of a fuckcluster of raid0 SSD's would be a much better improvement
That's not even considering latency, the massive latency from a SSD would hurt much more the system performance than having a smaller much faster memory
>>51531253
>when you use 8 cores. and each core write to the ram, you start getting issues.
Wtf are you talking about? That's what hypertransport/quick path interconnect are there for
>>51531297
>MMU
you are wrong, the hypervisor intervenes in the I/O operation and nullefines the delay.
>>51531253
Do you think the memory lane just magically creates itself on your motherboard when you plug in more data? Wtf?
>>51531447
Yes, you have no idea about what you're talking about
>>51531475
He's probably a PHP developer without any knowledge about CE and thinks he can bullshit us by throwing buzzwords at us hahahah
>Watching OP slowly realize his $5k investment is totally fucking useless.
>"Used Virtual: 2GB"
Run 20 VM's at once, or just something with 20GB ram usage.
I wanna see what happens.
>>51531986
lol more like 120bux for 3 x 120gb ssd
Your performance will nosedive once you actually start needing the SSD as RAM
You're a fuckwit OP
>>51532610
You mean the Performance I wouldt have had at all if I hadent had all this ram.
How about you take a nosedive into my ram.
I have now made a new Ram drive and I'm gone above 3TB of ram.
>>51532764
What are you doing that needs over 16GB of RAM?
>>51532764
10/10 chuckled hard
>>51532780
letting a memory leak run wild. for now, but I was thinking about testing it for a server setup.
>>51532764
How expensive is this bait?
>>51530785
lmao no you don't.
>>51532780
MS Exchange
>>51530629
this
swap =/= ram
I feel like this guy read a wikipedia article for 5 minutes, did this and felt like he's actually made a difference
>>51533179
Well you are correct I do use wikipedia, but I dont really read it, I make my own pdf books so I can edit the wrong parts my self, it does save a lot of time.
Heres my Cpu. show me yours.
>>51533376
i5 4690
ironically my pc probably outperforms yours the moment you actually put that into use
you understand you've made a large, slow swap disk that will have a lot of problems, yes?
Why are you so readily taking this bait, /g/?
The fuck is wrong with you?
>>51533403
>i5 4690
Sure, i cream a i7-5820k
and you think you got something with your i5 4690?
haha
>>51532764
good thread
>>51531253
>he doesnt realise his system will copy his virtual ram into actual ram before the cpu can access it
Congratulations. You have a fast swap disk that wouldn't be touched if you just put sufficient RAM in your system.
>>51530369
or you could buy 20 hard drives in raid 0 and do the same thing for like 60TB of ram :^)
>>51533825
and how would you put 330GB of ram into a desktop?
>>51532764
Someone. Cap this. Please. This is just epic.
>>51531016
Pff, DDR3. I was seeing better back in 2004 with DDR1.
>>51531016
Geez, and I just ran some latency tests on my RAM vs SSD. Ram saw about 62ns, the SSD's seq 4MB read latency was 8.3ms. That's a 133,870 times slower response time. Seq 4MB write was 16ms, 250,000 slower.
>>51533897
There's probably some server boards that can do that
sort of related to this thread. saw that SSDs are super cheap right now. Would getting a 2nd and creating a raid array be worth it?
You do realise that the data still needs to go through your actual RAM?
>>51530785
Wheres the point?
>>51530369
enjoy your dead ssd in 3 months
General question about RAM here. I'm running a G.1 Sniper H6 1150 mobo that supports dual channel RAM. I currently have 2x4g sticks of corsair vengeance ddr3 1600 RAM installed. I'm thinking about getting another two sticks of the same RAM but I'm unsure of the pros and cons of doing so. Any help? Also my cpu is an I5-4460 (non overclockable) if it makes any difference. Thanks.
>>51536697
>pros
more ram
>cons
none, if you use your PC like a "normal" person.
>>51536697
>>51536944
Also, this is why you dont buy 4Gb dual channel anymore but single channel 8Gb.
>>51536950
Well it was part of a newegg package deal so that was my only option at the time. Saved me a lot of money overall so I'm happy with it.
>CAS11
Poor anon.
