Redpill me on 144hz monitors, /g/
Can you even get a decent one without having to mortgage your home?
>>51524686
Unless you're a fucking vegan, yes.
>>51524686
X S T A R
S
T
A
R
...yes you can get one for $250 lol
>>51524686
BenQ XL2411Z
The catch? 1080p TN
You can't get a 144Hz display in 1440p or IPS unless you pay around $700+
If 1080p/TN is good enough for you, they're $220-$250
>>51524771
I don't know what any of that means, I just want the highest quality shit you got.
>>51524771
Great quality. I currently have three of them.
>>51524797
BenQ XL2411Z is the monitor I'm recommending you
You now what 144Hz is
1440p is the resolution 2560x1440
IPS is a type of display that has better colors and viewing angles
TN is the one with worse colors but faster response and cheaper
1080p is 1920x1080
>>51524771
What's wrong with 1080p and TN
TN has lowest response rate
>>51525231
The top/bottom and left/right colour shift is almost unbearable.
Fuck TN. Never again. You can still see the colour shift on IPS, but at least it's so minuscule that you can ignore it.
>>51525231
not this anon but:
tn has limited viewing angles (compared to IPS) + brightness/color shifting even if you sit at the center, depending how large your screen is of course but it is visible at 24"
also you should get gsync or freesync, depending on your gpu.. 144hz doesn't do shit for your if you can't run enough frames per second, except having worser picture quality if you don't pay atleast 700$
>>51525319
Can't really spot the "color shift" unless you deliberately try to look for it. At least not on my screens.
BenQ XL2411Z is pretty good. It's what I'm using, and I'm thinking of getting another one.
There should also be an AOC screen with 144Hz that's pretty good, but I've only seen it at a friends place so can't go in-depth about it.
>>51524969
but why?
>>51525409
the easiest way to notice it is if you have a red wallpaper
>>51525409
I have quite a bit above average vision, both spatial as well as colour perception, so the colour shift is extremely visible to me.
Personally, I'm waiting for the Eizo Foris FS2735 display to hit the market, but that's nothing OP is looking for. It's quite expensive.
>>51525324
Whats the required fps for 144hz?
>>51524686
If all you want is gaming get a cheap TN
Otherwise wait a few years
>>51525447
>red wallpaper
but why on earth would one use such a horrid color as a wallpaper?
>>51525472
Guess it boils down to personal preference, really.
For gayman I'd rather have my current monitor.
At work, I'd love to have an IPS panel.
Does anyone know if there are alternatives to the ASUS ROG Swift PG278Q that are cheaper, but come close to the same quality? I'm a gamer and not really into colorwork, so
response time > colors
>>51525551
you are an idiot. just look at >>51525472
i just said it is the best way to make the color shift the most obvious
>>51524686
>Redpill me
gb2/pol/, faggot
>>51525590
>redpilling is an exclusive /pol/ expression
>>51525590
>not knowing this is a Matrix reference
>>51525574
Easy on the autism. You just prove my point that you have to look for it to see it unless you're an exception.
>>51525590
>gb2/pol/, faggot
gb2/leftypol/, faggot.
What about ultrawide monitors?
>>51525631
>>51525639
>>51525644
>thinking it isn't a retarded expression
>thinking the matrix is a good movie
>>51525651
Shit. Most games nowadays are designed around a 16:9 FOV.
Using a 4:3 will cut off vision at the sides, 21:9 will cut off vision at the top and bottom. It's unfortunate, but most devs are lazy pieces of shit and don't bother making things work for many different aspect ratios.
>>51525522
144 Frames per Second for a frequency of 144 updates per second. I thought it was obvious. Everybody wants 60 FPS as a rule because most displays are 60Hz.
Not like you must always have 144FPS, but if it drops below 100 constantly it's probably gonna look like shit.
>>51525695
But most PC games have a FOV slider.
>>51525691
>bait
>>51525695
apparently, diablo 3 and lol expand your vision on 21:9 monitors
the only downsides i found out was that GUI like in fallout 4 with the Power Armor on, gets you pic related
but apparently there is a community made fix for it
https://www.reddit.com/r/ultrawidemasterrace/comments/3t5sgl/fallout_4_219_power_armor_fix/
>>51525839
oops wrong pic
>>51525522
>>51525754
which equals to 2x 980 ti in sli if you want the max out the game aswell, i mean if you want to play current top titles
>>51525324
So there's actually no point in getting 144hz if i don't go for higher end
>>51525839
I extremely doubt the LoL thing. It's probably a mod that is going to be patched out. LoL prides itself on being competitive. Giving people with expensive monitors an edge doesn't sound like them
>>51525953
Good god bethesda.
How they made it this far is a miracle
>>51525754
What games even allow for 120+ fps anyway
All I can think of is CS and mobas
i have a benq xl2730z and a crossfire of 390s hhheheheheh
you plebs
steady 80 fps in far cry 4 2k ultra msaa4x
70 fos crysis 3
75 fps fallout 4
>no stores in town has a BenQ XL2411Z so I can see how it looks before buying
I hate this shit
>>51525839
Do you own one. If so how often can you use that aspect ratio in your games
>>51526325
Just get it. If you want 144Hz TN 1080p it's the one of the only 2 good options, the other being the ASUS one which I am told looks a little bit more washed out
>>51526576
I'm not sure how TN looks though. My current monitor is an IPS and i'm afraid it'll look like shit in comparison
>>51526265
so you get 70fps on a 144hz monitor..
right.. whats the point exactly?
>>51524686
144Hz 1080p TN panels are affordable these days
you poor bitch
>>51526640
That's what I'm looking at.
But /g/ is also saying they're bad
>>51526593
It doesn't look like shit. It just looks dull. Not quite shit.
Do you need 144Hz though? What games do you typically play?
>>51526601
it defeats the purpose.
you should only need such a high referesh rate if you are playing competitive games such as quake or cs
>>51526655
Dota 2
>>51526648
You cannot go wrong with a 144Hz 1080p TN, just get one and if you have trouble or hate it... send it back.
When you go above 1080p is when you start running into trouble because most game devs are lazy and are not bothering to support 2K let alone 4K displays.
Also if you are going from 120Hz to 144Hz, dont bother, the performance boost in response times is debatable (i personally didn't notice a fucking difference, even on games I can get 300FPS+ on)
HOWEVER if you are on 60Hz refer to the first part of my post
>>51526701
I'm going from 50-60hz
>>51526206
Most games? Rarely do they ever limit the framerate.
>>51526720
1080p 144Hz TN panel
or IPS panel (if you care about colours) ...
fuck what /g/ is saying, you will never want to go back to 50-60Hz after you make the switch, just find one that you like ofcourse.
>>51526765
It's all webshopping, since no stores have them.
I just hope they wont be kikes if I find out I don't like it after taking it out of the box
>>51526648
Most people here are fucking retarded or blind. I have the ASUS 24" 1080p 144 Hz cheap TN. It's fucking great if you play FPS games.
>>51526784
Make sure they do refunds/returns/exchange.
when you find one you like, you will never look back.
>>51526687
You don't need 144Hz unless you spend at least half your time playing games like CSGO, Quake, or Unreal Tournament (but good luck driving a UE4 game like that at 120+ fps). Pretty much of you don't play fast paced FPS a ton you aren't going to see a difference. Yes there will be smoother desktop mouse movements and yes in some games you'll notice slightly smoother camera movement, but you get used to it so fast it becomes no different than 60Hz. From personal experience, 144Hz does nothing at all for Dota.
It will introduce issues is you play games in window mode too because different refresh rates between your 2 monitors and Aero's built in vsync unless you disable desktop composition.
You're probably better if looking for a nice 1440P IPS display
>>51526867
Alright, thanks.
My second monitor is indeed a 60hz and I play the game in borderless windowed and I also use aero, so I'd like it not to fuck up.
How about 4k? My PC probably can't run games at 4k, but how's browsing and such on those
>>51526867
Oh look, a nigga that goes slow.
>>51526921
If you are in the market for a monitor and you like playing games you are doing yourself a huge disservice if you don't go 1080p 144 or 1440p 144. Seriously, don't listen to people that say 60 Hz is enough. It's like a slideshow once you've gamed on something else.
Now, if you use your monitor primarily for watching movies or something? Yeah I can understand not going for a 144 Hz monitor that likely has inferior color depth to a quality IPS panel.
>games don't work over 60 Hz
Yeah, like shit games developed by Shitthesda? Even still, if you insist on playing these games, you can easily switch your refresh rate in the span of a few mouse clicks. Not a big deal.
4K is a fucking meme for anything under 30". Go 144/1440p if your setup can handle it.
>>51526921
I've never used one but I get the impression it's still to early. I don't know if there are even more budget 4K IPS monitors, and if there are I find it hard to believe they'd be very good since early 4K stuff even in TN suffered from massive input lag and 30Hz refresh rate caps
Either way 1440p would allow you to play games and drive them easily. At 1440p you don't need anti-aliasing which is a good tradeoff in performance
Not OP but is it worth getting the PG278Q over the PG279Q or XB271HU. I don't only plan to game, but watch anime, and the occasional photoshop.
>>51524686
not 144hz, but can overclock to 120hz
http://www.ebay.com/itm/CrossOver-2795QHD-2560x1440-LG-AH-IPS-Non-Glare-27-Monitor-/331605526911?hash=item4d353ac97f:g:BcoAAOSw-vlVpRIC
http://www.overclock.net/t/1555354/official-crossover-2795-qhd-pwm-flicker-free-overclock-able-matte-1440p-ah-ips
seriously the best monitor for the price.
>>51527003
Don't listen to this guy. He's a fucking idiot. I've had a BenQ XL2411Z for a good long while and I run SLI GTX 780s so I run everything at over 144fps. This guy is genuinely a fool. The gain from 144Hz has almost zero impact in many games, low impact on somewhat action games (GTA, Saints Row, etc), slightly more impact on more action based games (MGSV) but only truly impactful and worth it over 1440p/IPS on fast paced FPS or maybe even TPS
>>51527003
What's the point of getting 144hz if your computer can't even run everything at steady 60fps
>>51527003
>>51526867
>/g/ in a nutshell
Now the guys just even more confused than he was to begin with, lol
>>51527003
>if you use your monitor primarily for watching movies or something? Yeah I can understand not going for a 144 Hz monitor that likely has inferior color depth to a quality IPS panel.
But if you're watching movies, they'll display correctly on the 144 Hz monitor (144 / 24 fps = 6) instead of hiccuping during slow camera panning like on a 60 Hz screen.
I want a zero frame lag VA panel with the strobing configurability of the benq z series.
>>51527171
>zero impact in many games
The difference is fucking obvious in competitive FPS games if you aren't shit. I'm pretty sure that's what we're talking about here and I'm pretty sure that's the angle that OP is coming from if he's even considering 144 Hz monitors.
Obviously AAA console port casual bullshit games that were designed to run at 720p/60 Hz on a fucking Xbox (the useless games you pointed out) aren't what we're talking about. Fuck off with your shitty casual opinions.
>>51527174
There isn't one. You need to have a good PC to be in the market for a 144 Hz monitor, unless you're playing Quake/CS 1.6 or something.
>>51527266
Actually I barely play FPS games other than CSGO sometimes but not very often
>>51527281
Then I think you've got your answer. Enjoy your 60 Hz monitor.
do i even need one if i don't play games like cs:go? I was talking with my friends about it and they said get one anyway but I feel like I don't need to spend that much if I won't notice the difference.
Everyone in this thread is retarded.
>>51527310
you don't "need" one, but it looks glorious in any game.
>>51524771
Another catch is the lack of displayport
only DL-DVI, HDMI, and VGA
>>51527266
OP said he plays games like Dota not competitive FPS so how about reading the fucking thread you moron. Skipping over 90% of your shitty post just like you skipped over 90% of this thread
>>51527266
Dude you're so stupid read his whole post Jesus
>>51527310
>I can't wait to go back to using my 60 Hz monitor.
Said nobody ever.
>>51527373
>recommending a 60 Hz monitor to a guy that plays any video game
End yourself.
>>51527392
Can't wait to get back to my $1000 60Hz 4K IPS display with pixel density and clarify so fucking mind blowing that you would literally jizz if you saw it after a lifetime of washed out 1999 technology
>>51527415
I hope you understand how dumb is your post, right ?
>>51527343
I don't know what to believe anymore to be honest
>>51526141
depends on what games you play. In csgo, even cheap cards can exceed 144 fps, so a 144hz monitor is still worth
>>51527466
But I don't play CSGO
>>51526188
Are you really bashing the entire company of Bethesda for resolution errors just 2 weeks into release? Try harder.
So what monitor would be suited for something like competitive halo 5?
Alright familia lets get this straight
I play dota and random new games like fallout 4 most of the time
Barely play any competitive FPS
What should I go for?
>>51527426
I hope you understand how dumb is your post, right ?
I got this for 100e, is it good?
http://www.samsung.com/uk/business/business-products/business-monitor/performance/LS23C65UDS/EN
>>51527540
Isn't halo a console exclusive? Assuming I'm right, pretty much any monitor or TV to be honest. It's probably capped at 30fps and there's only so much you can do with analogues despite reaction speed. I guess this means a nice 1080p 60Hz IPS display for the superior colors, like the Acer H6 H236HLbid or the H6 H276HLbmid
>>51527561
Why are you even thinking about buying a new monitor?
>>51527645
because my secondary monitor broke
>>51524686
Are there any 144Hz 2560x1080 curved monitors?
Or 144Hz 3440x1440 curved monitors?
>>51527660
why would you want curved
>>51527685
I'm addicted to them, but only ultra-wide screen ones. The regular 16:9 curved monitors do jack shit for me.
I have two overclocked 980Tis and mostly play FPS. Is it worth getting a 1440p 144Hz monitor anyway or 4K 60Hz?
If you are getting a new monitor 1080p to 1440p is a better option.
Of course you can get 144hz AND 1440p, but that is even more expensive.
But let's say you can afford that, running a game at high resolution + with 144fps most of the time also means you have to have a pretty beastly gfx card, even relatively low demand competitive games will need something around a gtx980.
>>51527561
Can you drive 1440p with your hardware? 1440p IPS display (60Hz) with a 5ms response time or less. Can't drive 1440p? The same thing but 1080p. There are many options. Some affordable great 1080p versions (but with mediocre stands) are the Acer H6 series (the 23" is a good size for 1080p) and the ASUS VS229H-P and VS239H-P. Of the two brand imo Acer has the better product but it's glossy so beware of direct sunlight. No VESA mounting holes though. If you're looking for something with a much better stand I think the ASUS PL (or was it PB) series offers something.
When it comes to 1440p I can't give much advice except to say I've heard BenQ has a 1440p IPS monitor with an excellent stand at an average 1440p price. Not sure how it performs though. Research this.
>>51527732
At that budget get a 144Hz 1440p IPS Gsync monitor. The new ASUS ROG product looks great.
>>51527732
144hz is worth it, don't know if there are any curved ones, but definitely some 1440p ones (Acer XB270HU is a good one also with gsync)
>>51527758
Can't find any 24inch 1440p's
Not sure if I've got the space on my desk for a 27inch
Anyone know how's the Samsung U24E590D?
>>51527812
24 is too small. Windows doesn't have good scaling. How about a mount? They sell arms that clamp to the back of your desk and hold your monitor if it has VESA mounting holes.
>>51524969
Yep. Was a bitch to have Nvidia default to 144Hz on startup on Ubuntu. But got it fixed and I'm happy now.
What's the deal with 4k?
Is it any good or trash? I noticed you can get some pretty reasonably priced 4k monitors
>really want to upgrade to 1440p/144hz/gsync
>almost no options and everything is expensive as shit
I can get the rog swift for $550 though
but i figure i should just wait for the price to drop. plus that acer ips one is pretty much the same price
fuck g-sync man, has like a $200 price premium over a free-sync
>>51527955
It's both. There are some good ones and there are some garbage ones. Better do research on your own than ask here. Don't buy one just cause it's there and has x features. Look up a review on specific monitors
>>51528056
$550 ROG is TN. Wait some time for the new IPS model to not be permanently out of stock and get that instead. MSRP is like $200 more but worth over the TN because IPS. Also overall higher quality in most ways
>>51526152
FOV isn't easily adjustable in a game like LoL but I'm fairly certain the wider the screen the *less* you see. The professional gamers use 'square' resolutions (e.g. 4:3).
>>51524686
Aren't they like cheap as fuck now for the TN panels?
>>51528235
Aren't TN panels trash
>>51526533
i own the lg 29um67-p. every modern game i've played so far worked seemless without any extra modification. except fallout but you just set the resolution in the settings.cfg
>>51526188
They make the game targeted for console which has far more customers than PCs with niche monitors.
>>51528238
Most monitors out there are TN panels
>>51524771
>>51524686
>>51524716
>>51524722
>>51524735
4k FREESYNC 144HZ 27" WHEN
>>51527254
check eizo
I've got $1000 set aside for then we get a 144hz ultrawide IPS monitor
>>51526022
I doubt 2x980ti is enough to 144fps in most titles. Only stuff like dota/csgo/rocket league.
Maaaaybe at 1080p, but doubt it.
>>51528296
Q2 2017
>>51528321
Is there none now?
Is there going to be a new version of the eizo FG2421? I want a VA 1440p monitor with their anti motion blur stuff.
>tfw no job so can only afford korean
>>51528472
I don'tthink so
I'm still confused as to whether 144hz is worth it or not if you don't play competitive shooters
I have an Nixeus 144hz freesync monitor with a freesync range of 30hz to 144hz.
It's amazing how much easier War Thunder got after I bought it.
>>51528489
The FS2735 seems a bit up your alley then. IPS, 1440p, 144Hz, Freesync, and motion blur reduction.
Too bad it'll cost an arm and a leg.
>>51529147
but if you own amd, this monitor seems to suit for the next 6 years at least
>>51528310
I don't need to. I have an Eizo Foris FG2421 and that's why I want one with the configurability of a benq. It only has one strobe mode and can only be used at 120hz. Benq xl2411z for example can strobe at any refresh rate and display at any refresh, in 1hz increments, with 1ms display persistence. It's the best monitor for strobing but it's a shitty TN panel. VA is best or OLED but there are no affordable OLED monitors with good strobing features.
Just bought the ASUS VG248QE that Newegg has for US$209.
Did I just fuck up on this meme-tech?
>>51525763
>I have no idea how FOV sliders work and I'm going to boast about it.
Seriously, have a read about vert- and hor+. Most games switch from hor+ to vert- when you reach 16:9. The slider has no relevance.
>>51529147
I'm going to preorder one next month. It's just too good to pass.
>http://www.eizoglobal.com/products/foris/fs2735/index.html
>https://www.eizo.de/foris/fs2735/technische-daten/#technical-data
>>51528657
The best choices for gaming ultrawides right now are both from Acer, there's a 75hz with Freesync (overclocks to 85hz) and a 100hz with G-sync. The G-sync one is well over $1000 (it's $1800 fucking dollars in CAD, I think $1350 or something in USD).
Those ultrawides look really great but they're expensive as fuck, also I worry about the support for them in a lot of games. I'd get the Freesync one if I was going to pick either, 75-85hz is still a huge improvement over 60hz and I don't feel like spending $500 extra for gsync and 15hz. Maybe next year by the time the new cards come out there'll be more options to choose from in ultrawides, or at least the prices will go down.
> muh gaymes
>>51525590
Go back to reddit, cück
>>51527561
>random new games
>Fallout 4
Are you retarded?
>>51528323
Is this a /g/ meme?
Csgo=cpu
Graphics card is irrelevant
i4970k + gtx980ti = 400-300 FPS maxed out 1080p
>>51529532
On the upside, most ultrawides have native support for throwing up black bars on the edges and keeping the aspect ratio of it's cousin resolution. A lot even have support for stretch and fill instead of box if you're a neanderthal.
>>51527475
then 144hz is probably a waste. you're better off going 1440/4k ips
>>51529329
Na it's good. It's the only direct competitor to the BenQ XL2411Z. It's viable if you need a 144Hz display, aka if you play a lot of fast games or FPS
>>51530253
sometimes i wonder, why does it seem like those pre-gsync/freesync 144hz monitors stood at the 280-350$ mark for almost 3 years
and new tech is just hell of a lot more expensive and the prices still won't drop..
i'm talking about the 2411T which is the predecessor of the Z which is more or less just hardware/software tweaks.
>>51530379
Probably buyer trends are sticking with current stuff. Nobody is shifting over to the new tech yet, so everything under it is still selling at the same price. Once new tech drops closer to striking distance and people start jumping on board, the cost shift will move so that the freesync 144 moves lower.
>>51530436
hopefully.. i'm glad samsung is doing the first step to introduce freesync enabled 4k monitors.. i'll never get a non freesync monitor in the next century, this shit is awesome and made GTA 5 for example much more enjoyable and it feels buttery smooth at 45 fps with all settings at maximum on my r9 290
I find it funny that you people get annoyed by very minor screen tearing with VSYNC off but you don't seem to mind the entire screen blurring the entire time with a sample and hold display.
>>51530379
QHD 144Hz display just came to the market last year. Before that, all we had were overclocking Korean displays. Of course new tech will be more expensive.
The first QHD IPS displays to hit the market 4 years ago had roughly the same initial prices, until the advert of the Korean's two years later.
If you wait two years, QHD 144Hz and 4K displays will cost roughly half of what the cost today, and the new 4K 120Hz displays hitting the market in 2-4 years will be equally expensive initially.
>>51526797
I also have The asus one. Its really good. I love The smoothness The 144hz gives. It hurts my autism to use secondary 75hz cuz it feels laggy compared to 144hz.
>>51530712
I'd take that minor amount of tearing any day over the lag vsync introduces. Fuck. That. Shit.
Luckily I'll be on Freesync next month.
>>51528400
I don't understand why they don't just make them now and charge a ridiculous price for people who can afford them
>>51527171
> slightly more impact on more action based games (MGSV)
MGSV is locked to 60fps. So just stop talking as it's clear you have no idea what you're talking about
>>51530824
Fuck input lag. Motion clarity is far more important than anything else. And if you cap your framerate 1 FPS under your refresh rate, the input lag is reduced by a shitload and you still get VSYNC then and then you can used strobed display modes which you can't use with Freesync, which gives you perfect motion clarity.
Is it worth going over 1080p yet? in term of money/performance worth.
Im still using this old overprice LG monitor that I bought since 2010
Since its thank giving so I thought It might be a good time to change if any decent monitor is on sale
Thinking of going dual Monitor this time around
>>51528296
>4k at 27"
jesus why. also I hope you have like 3 fucking Titans if you want to drive 4k at 144hz
>>51532821
we just need faster video carrying standards. dp 1.3 will be able to support 4k at 120Hz I think, but not sure about 144Hz.
It's kind of sad that it's pretty apparent how dp 1.3 is limited (there's no way we can do >4k at 120Hz, so a larger "retina" screen like 27 5k or 30" 8k at 120Hz will definitely require more jerry-rigging or another advance in standards).
who's /30"/ here?
OP just get a 60hz low response 1080p or 1440p
If you don't play twitch shooters you don't need 144hz
Why do most arguments against 144hz function on "need?" You generally don't need an IPS monitor but you _want_ it for its benefits.
>>51534576
Is it worth sacrificing GOOD colors to run CS:GO faster?
>>51534593
Because there aren't 144hz IPS monitors? And this is beside the point about the idiocy of arguing "need" 144hz.
>>51534609
Well, sure there are 144hz IPS monitors. But the people in the thread asking whether or not they should get 144hz don't seem to have the budget.
>>51534665
Let me get this straight. I point out how retarded it is to argue against getting a 144hz monitor based on "need" because it is just as retarded to argue against getting an IPS based up "need" and you respond to my post without addressing the point of the post?
Hey guys i'm building my new pc, i got a r9 fury and i'm looking for a 27" screen, is there something good for gaming in the 390€-450€ range? Spec :Radeon r9 fury
AMD fx-8320
8gb ram
Asus m5a99x
1tb
120gb ssd
Rs600w cooler master
>>51524686
Although my XL2411Z uses a TN display, the color and viewing angle is pretty good. Compared it with my U2414H.
And strobing is a nice addition, if you can handle the crosstalk.
>>51532945
needlessly big
>>51535514
?
bought this for 100€ used
http://www.iiyama.com/gb_en/products/prolite-g2773hs-1/
did i do good? fucking love 120hz doe
instantly sold my 60hz monitor after getting this one, i also mounted it on a wall, so 27" fullhd is not bothering me
>>51529912
u wot m8
>>51530712
what do you mean
>>51527475
then it's a waste. I mean it's nice to have smooth motion but the difference over 60 is really only noticeable with fast-paced competitive FPS like csgo, quake, stuff like that. or maybe you're just a CRT fag addicted to that kind of responsiveness. for most people a good IPS/VA will be a more perceptible upgrade, and it's better suited to lower-power machines.
>>51527486
>resolution error
more the fact that the "cockpit view" for the power armor is just a lazy static overlay that bobs a bit.
>>51538539
Yeah I've been considering just getting a good IPS instead. Maybe find one with a low response time, if possible
