Monitoring because I'm probably gonna do a web course called introductory to R language in this period. It's worth two credits and you just have to complete these four multiple answer question sets with 80% correct each.

I don't really care about the R language though. I only chose statistics minor because nothing else really interested me either.

>>51518736
I want to use R to analyze data produced by evolution simulators I write.

I use python/scipy/numpy/matplotlib but I've been noticing that a lot of it is not that solid and wondering if R would be better.

>>51518849
What do you dislike about those languages?

R is nice I think

Not really used it

Do you not understand the utility of a language that's well suited to manipulate statistical data? R is thoroughly used in this field because it works and it's free.

I have used it a lot on our statistics and geography courses, also our professor is like an R guru or something, he has done a lot of work with it and written lots of packages.

I never really got into it, the documentation for most functions and packages is just.. weird I guess.

>>51518704
The R Inferno by Patrick Burns
Advanced R by Hadley Wickham

>>51518704
check this, mang.
https://www.r-project.org/doc/bib/R-books.html
I currently reading "using R for statistics".
"introduction to R for quantitative economics"
"Using R for numerical Analysis in Science and Engineering"

>>51518704
I once used it to cobble together a program to plot the hailstone numbers. Haven't touched it since. It was relatively straightforward; pleasingly simple language really.