>2015
>Backlight bleed and glow STILL hasn't been completely fixed for ANY IPS panels at all
Was it just a meme technology all alone?
>>51518491
>fixed
It's inherent to the technology.
>>51518491
Bleed can be avoided if you buy a high-end display, while glow is indeed inherent to the technology.
There were some IPS displays made a while ago that used a special filter to remove IPS glow, but the trade-off was in skewed colors, which wasn't considered worth pursuing.
>>51518491
>Amoled displays
>"much amazing display, best on the market" (reviewers)
>Amoled displays getting burn in after a while
>no reviewer says anything about that
>sheeple keep buying and buying and buying
>>51519931
>I got this item free for review
does the view still count if I stop watching from then?
is backlight bleed guaranteed in a €150 ips?
I can settle for a less colorful TN if it means no bleed
>>51520920
TN still has bleed, but on high end ones it's less bad than IPS.
The only way to completely avoid backlight bleed is not to have a backlight, so OLED, Plasma, CRT etc.
>>51521398
ah fuck it I'll get an IPS and play the lottery
what brands are known to have a lot of bleed issues? first I was going to get an Asus but I've read they very often have massive bleed and RMAing with Asus is a pain in the ass, so now I'm thinking LG
>>51520920
Get a monitor with an MVA/VA panel.
My Dell U2414H doesn't have baclight bleed at all, but it has uneven backlight/brightness and it triggers my autism hard.
Whenever I'm looking at a solid color, I notice how the middle of the screen is noticeably brighter than the rest of the screen. Getting a perfect display on a monitor that costs less than $1000 is impossible. Fucking subhuman chinks who make them are cunts.
>>51520920
>is backlight bleed guaranteed in a €150 ips
No, but it's very common.
