What is the best web browser? I like Firefox a lot, but it is very slow sometimes.
>>51462233
Netscape Navigator is my personal favorite. Chrome is also good because i need to stay botnet free
chrome its the fastest and has the best features
>>51462377
is this a ruse?
>>51462233
>2015
>not making your own browser
Pleb
Also, is Vivaldi any good?
>>51462233
None of thee above if pic related
Pale Moon
Old Firefox but with security updates
>>51462729
Firefox was legit a long time ago, they try their best
What's your guys opinion on tor?
>>51462729
Still wish you could play streams on it.
>>51462827
Opera is a great browser. The only thing people ever have to say about it is that nobody uses it. It's basically Chrome without the phoning home. Hell, it even supports Chrome extensions.
I use Chrome, Firefox, and Opera.
Chrome for basic browsing and shitposting, Firefox for personal stuff, and Opera for sites I want to support without adblock.
i use chrome on windows, but safari on mac is top notch
Firefox if you have a not-shit computer.
For toasters I use Pale Moon, which is firefox designed for shit computers.
Chropera is the best.
-Best Windows integration.
-Looks classy and professional.
-No Google shit shoved into your throat.
-Best new tab page (speed dial).
-Android version with synchronization.
-Opera Turbo.
>>51466030
Chropera is the best.
>Best Windows integration.
integration what?
>Looks classy and professional.
looks like a typical fucking 2015 "modern" look, way too many edges, way to simple
>No Google shit shoved into your throat.
google is the best part about the internet
>Best new tab page (speed dial).
every browser has this. also
>facebook, twitter, reddit, microsoft news
yeah thats where you belong
>Android version with synchronization.
snychronization of what? also who the fuck uses phones
>Opera Turbo.
literally what?
>>51462827
>0% market share
Why is this even an argument? Especially on /g/ of all places, where half of you autists prefer the less used counterpart.
>>51465835
This DESU - and it's a shame. They need to hurry the fuck up and do extensions (properly)
>>51462233
The best browser version is over two years old and dead.
Think about that stagnation for a moment.
>>51466082
>what is Opera Turbo
Data compression VPN
>>51466143
probably causes slower loading times lol. compressing and uncompressing it takes longer than just downloading it raw for me
>>51466167
Causes faster loading times and saves a significant amount of data depending on what you're viewing, which is nice when on metered connections
>>51466082
>integration what?
It looks like a native Windows application. On Windows 7 the tabs are rounded, uses Aero, for example. On Windows 10 it looks like that pic related.
Chrome looks out of place on Windows 8/10 and Firefox can't even use the same colors than the DE.
>looks like a typical fucking 2015 "modern" look, way too many edges, way to simple
Have you used UC Browser? How about Yandex? Other browsers may be minimalist too, may have a lot of stuff in the interface, and they look unprofessional. Yes, it looks "modern", yet it doesn't look like an unpolished Visual Studio project.
>google is the best part about the internet
I use google for my searches. I use other services for everything else, yet I'm glad to being able to select what I want. Opera allows me to do that more than Chrome.
>[Speed Dial] every browser has this. also
Yes, and yet the Speed Dial of Opera has been always the best. Firefox doesn't allow folders, Chrome is just plain unusable and slow. The extensions are lame and with bugs, or they load on top of the new tab (Firefox)
>yeah thats where you belong
>Ad-Hominem.
Practically every argument you have is fucking invalid now, fucking troll.
>snychronization of what? also who the fuck uses phones
Bookmarks and tabs. Are you Stallman?
>literally what?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZfFU7R75Wo
I love Firefox, but I'm pissed that they're getting rid of tab groups.
>>51466082
Another thing about integration, Opera uses an special icon on the Start Menu, resembling a Windows 10 app, and it uses the Windows notifications. Is the only browser who does this, Edge can't show notifications at all.
>>51466174
>significant amount of data
>downloading a 100 KB .php file
kek
>>51466366
It has a meter and keeps track of the data saved compared to actually loading the page, and by the end of the month I'd have a few hundred megabytes saved, which is a lot when on a plan with 1.5GB data before throttling
>>51466366
>>downloading a 100 KB .php file
>He browses only one site per day.
>>51466366
Anon stop, this is pathetic.
>>51466405
>which is a lot when on a plan with 1.5GB data before throttling
kek im downloading 2 TB a month you pleb. git good
>>51466408
>He browses only one site per day.
im certainly only browsing one page at the time. im downloading at 13 MB/s. do you think it matters if youre downloading 50 KB or 100 KB?
>>51466452
I'm talking about my phone plan. I used to use Opera Turbo when I browsed and still do when I tether
>>51466472
>I'm talking about my phone plan.
just stop it dude youre killing me
>>51466488
What? Saving a few hundred megabytes on a 1.5GB plan is a lot. And let's not forget that it actually does make slow connections faster.
>>51466501
STOP.USING.PHONES.TO.BROWSE.THE.INTERNET
is that really that hard to understand?
>>51466532
I don't use a phone to browse the Internet, dipshit. I use my phone's Internet to browse on a laptop.
>>51466538
>I don't use a phone to browse the Internet, dipshit. I use my phone's Internet to browse on a laptop.
im fucking out
>>51466582
What's the issue?
>>51466532
Enlighten me, anon. Why using my phone to browse the internet is bad?
>>51466582
I dont understand your problem anon
This is where I walk in to a battle scene and get clubbed to death.
Anyone fuck with Edge? I'm using it right now, so far so good. I must say it looks a hell of a lot neater and aesthetically pleasing compared to Chrome and Firefox. Haven't really messed with much of its intricacies as of yet however.
>>51466532
most autistic post I saw on /g/ yet
>>51466614
>>51466538
and you tried your best to match his autism
why does your brain not allow you to browse the internet with your phone? please explain that to us lesser autistic
>>51466628
is bretty gud but some people need extensions
also >LE EDGE/IE XD memes
>>51466628
I would use it if I had a Windows Phone and if it had ad blocking. It seems fast and I like the interface, specially the new tab.
>>51466030
>>51466359
Your .jpg compression is utterly disgusting, consider suicide.
>>51466643
>hurr everyone is autistic but me
>>51466614
the problem is that youre using your phones internet on your computer
>>51466698
>the problem is that youre using your phones internet on your computer
...and?
>>51462390
>fastest
debatable
>best features
ahhahahahhah, no
>>51462709
Love the interface, still lack some customizability to be as good as old Opera.
Shit implementation, it's very very slow.
>>51466707
do i have to fuckign spoonfeed you? fucking connect to your router
>inb4 i have no router
>>51466712
haha hehehe yes
Opera. Just enter the Konami code in the settings, don't forget to check out the flags.
>>51466718
Not that anon but did you know that laptops are commonly used outside the house? And sometimes the place where you are using it doesn't have free internet access? Then you can use a phone to get internet from your plan.
C'mon anon, do you even work?
>>51466718
Are you fucking stupid. Let's think for a moment, why would I be using a mobile computer connected to a mobile phone for Internet? Maybe because I'm not fucking home? Holy shit you are beyond retarded.
>>51466644
I was just reading that they're going to start porting Chrome & Firefox extensions over for it. When it will be out, nobody knows. Microsoft is the worst when it comes to deadlines, if they even have an understanding of term.
>>51466730
hihihihi no
commit sudoku
>>51466750
>used outside the house?
no? laptops are on your LAP. thats what a laptop is. they were never designed to be portable
>2 hour battery
>yeah sure i can take it anywhere and finish my work
No
also
>buying a laptop
fucking keked
>>51466758
feb-mar 2016 is the new deadline. Probably it won't support chrome extensions but it will use HTML-based ones, making it easy to port them to Edge.
>>51466770
/v/ is over there, kiddo.
>>51466030
>-Best Windows integration.
Integration with what?
>-Looks classy and professional.
Says the one with the loli desktop background.
>-No Google shit shoved into your throat.
It's not the only one.
>-Best new tab page (speed dial).
Kinda agreed. Best new tab page is a custommade html + css page though.
>-Android version with synchronization.
Agreed.
>-Opera Turbo.
Agreed.
I hate how fucking big the bars are and how much space they waste.
Shitty UI impossible to customize. They should have changed name tbqh, this is shitting on Opera philosophy.
>>51466788
/v/ is over there, kiddo.
what is that ? videos and films?
>>51466770
>laptops
>not portable
kek'd
>2 hour battery life
>inb4 bunch of apple fags storm this thread and praise the glory of steve jobs cock
all in all a 5/10 bait
try harder next time
>>51466804
what were you trying to achieve with this post. not in the slightest have you changed my opinion about laptops
>>51466791
>big bars
Not when maximized. He also didn't disable above tabs padding in the advanced settings.
>>51466628
I use it as fallback browser for rare issues of compatibility.
It isn't as bad as it's made to be. Not that good either.
>>51466644
I have a windows phone and still can't figure out how to sync favourites and stuff.
Feels bad man.
>>51466791
>He uses Reddit XD meme
Ok, move on.
>Integration with what?
Integration with the system, at least on Windows and Mac. Uses the system's notifications, the interface has the same look as a native application, etc.
>Says the one with the loli desktop background.
Ehm... yes. So? Excuse me, what's your argument here?
>It's not the only one.
Of course.
>Best new tab page is a custommade html + css page though.
I have seen some neat ones, yes. Making one takes time and effort that I prefer to waste browsing Reddit and downloading loli pics.
>>51466839
I did, just look here >>51466359 . Fuck UC Browser and Yandex for not having that option.
>>51466359
Firefox with gnotifier addon can do Windows notifications
>>51466830
you had an opinion? Sorry mistook your post for a shitty troll
and I didn't try to achieve anything with my post
ok then we go again
>>51466770
>they were never designed to be portable
Laptops are very much portable and are designed to, you should try using them when you are not at home
maybe in a train, a plane, in a bar or wherever you have time, outside of your home, to do some work or write emails etc in a good environment (not a small phone screen)
or to just watch movies or play Plants vs. Zombies to pass the time
>2 hour battery life
you should try using a laptop that does have a functioning battery instead of a broken one that leaks
you easily get 7 hours or more
>>51466890
>gnotifier
Hey anon, thank you, I didn't knew about it.
>>51466890
>gnotifier
can't find it
>>51466935
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/gnotifier/
>>51466791
I wouldn't trade any custom NTP for the NTP sync.
Pale moon
>>51466912
>you had an opinion? Sorry mistook your post for a shitty troll
>and I didn't try to achieve anything with my post
typical response from an idiot. im not gonna bother with the rest of your post anymore. its 10:20 am im going to bed. i hope you die a painful death
>>51466879
Both customized vivaldi and firefox look more consistent with my Win10
Loli Backgrounds mean you have no idea what professional looking means.
If it's not the only one not shoving Google down your throat, then it's not a point for Opera only.
I did my custom hompage in literally 2 hours and I have no clue about programming.
Also, Vivaldi speed dial is on par with Opera, if not better because you have actual desktop screenshot in the tab instead of the retarded icon. Expecially useful when in a speed dial folder you have more bookmarks from the same site.
But really. I still use Opera from time to time, but they really gimped it and removing all the customizability was the biggest crime of the developers.
>>51462709
Yes
>>51462614
it used to be my favorite...
back in the day
>>51466995
epically edgy post
>>51467007
>Both customized vivaldi and firefox look more consistent with my Win10
Vivaldi looks great. Firefox doesn't, look at these gradients. You should try an Edge Stylish.
>Loli Backgrounds mean you have no idea what professional looking means.
I can't see the co-relation. It seems you are just trying to use one, unrelated thing to pretend to have more credibility than me.
>If it's not the only one not shoving Google down your throat, then it's not a point for Opera only.
Do you really want to defend your arguments with stupid shit like this?
>I did my custom hompage in literally 2 hours and I have no clue about programming.
They probably we have different expectations for our new tab pages. I want visual, dynamic content, easy accessible by 1 or two clicks, that it should be accessible on my phone and doesn't cause redundancy with my bookmarks.
>Also, Vivaldi speed dial is on par with Opera, if not better because you have actual desktop screenshot in the tab instead of the retarded icon.
Opera does this too, is just that you can choose if you like icons or thumbnails. Personally, I prefer icons, easy to identify, specially if there are many, just what icons are made for.
>Expecially useful when in a speed dial folder you have more bookmarks from the same site.
Agreed.
>they really gimped it and removing all the customizability was the biggest crime of the developers.
Yeah, I understand you, and I will probably look at Vivaldi once a mobile version is made or has a substitute for Turbo, which, are two big features that Opera still has.
>>51466995
western australia?
>>51467125
sorry i meant new zealand
What browser with bookmark function is the fastest and most lightweight?
>>51467165
Internet Explorer.
>>51466865
Doesn't it sync with a Microsoft account? Thought you just signed into your PC OS and WP.
>>51467530
That's what I thought too.
I guess that I'm gonna google how to do it and stop being a lazy cunt.
>>51467661
Ok, I guess it's because:
a) I had settings to sync less possible stuff
b) I have explorer on the phone and edge on the desktop
>>51462709
using it with cvim right now
bretty gud
>>51466131
vivaldi, opera reboot basically
witch ever one sync best with all your devices
>>51467760
For my experience, each one has is pros and cons.
Firefox and Chrome syncs more data, including extensions. Firefox can't save fucking favicons.
Opera and Yandex offers a better interface to see synced content, and is easier to delete devices. But they don't sync extensions or passwords.
UC Browser is fucking buggy. I don't remember anything particular with Maxthon.
>>51467933
are you talking about smartphones too? Do firefox and chrome on android have extensions now? That's pretty sweet
>>51467958
>are you talking about smartphones too?
Yes
>Do firefox and chrome on android have extensions now?
Only Firefox and UC Browser. Chrome syncs extensions through Chrome for desktop, Firefox for both.
Vivaldi seems slow on my old ass laptop..
>>51467984
It's slow on my new ass laptop as well.
>>51468000
Welp.
Guess I stick with latest version of Firefox.
>>51468008
>latest
I think you meant 40
>>51466718
Gr8 b8
>>51468027
im using 43.05b
why should I use 40
Can someone enlighten me, why is it so bad for you if you use a botnet browser
>>51468045
Not to be stripped of functions as firekeks proceed to try to be another chrome ripoffs?
>>51468064
well i just need bookmark and security, and speed.
unless they take away one of those im fine.
>>51468064
>stripped of functions
like what?
>>51468084
Dropping xul and xcom extensions support to instead support chrome extensions.
Which means losing a good bunch of extensions that aren't simply based on the api they give you.
E.g. Down them all, stylish, etc.
Where were you when they announced that and there were threads about it up 24/7?
>>51468189
>>51468084
Here, found the official source. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-firefox-add-ons/comment-page-1/#comment-218580
>>51468226
While extension signing will not be enforced until Firefox 42, the code has shipped with Firefox 40, allowing users to see if installed extensions have been validated by Mozilla. Users of Firefox Developer Edition will have noticed that unsigned add-ons were blocked beginning on August 14.
The full schedule for add-on signing is currently as follows:
Firefox 40: Users will see a warning in the add-ons manager about unsigned extensions, but all extensions will continue to work.
Firefox 41: Unsigned extensions will be disabled by default, and Firefox will have a preference (xpinstall.signatures.required) that allows signature enforcement to be turned off.
Firefox 42 and beyond:
The Beta and Release versions of Firefox based on 42 and above (Beta 42 will be released at the same time as Firefox 41) will remove the preference that allows unsigned extensions to be installed, and will disable and/or prevent the installation of unsigned extensions.
The Nightly and Developer Editions of Firefox based on 42 and above will retain the preference to disable signing enforcement, allowing the development and/or use of unsigned add-ons in those versions. Unbranded versions of Firefox based on releases will also be made available for developers, and are expected to be in place for Firefox 42 for release (and potentially beta).
>Best Windows integration.
Personally I only use win7 so it makes no difference.
>Looks classy and professional.
Looks good? Yes. Professional? Debatable.
>No Google shit shoved into your throat.
Chrome doesn't really do that. When you open it up it's just the searchbar and speeddial + your account on the top right.
>-Best new tab page (speed dial).
Every broswer have this.
>-Android version with synchronization.
Every broswer also have this.
>-Opera Turbo.
Now this is probably good. But I've only used the mobile version so I can't tell the difference with my unstable internet.
>Down Them All and Stylish
I'm sure they'll be coded to be supported, right?
There's no way those two extensions will disappear... right?
Fuck, I use them the most.
>>51468488
>stylish
Unlikely.
The chromelike extensions can work only with apis provided by the browser developer, unlixe xul/xcom extensions.
>Down Them All
http://www.downthemall.net/the-likely-end-of-downthemall/
>>51462827
Blepic, simple blepic!
>>51468530
Fuck.
Fucking cunts.
I want to die.
>>51465840
This
>>51468824
I want actual firefucks management to die, tbqh, not me nor you.
>>51462827
/g/ in a nutshell
everything is shit
>>51469201
It's not /g/ fault if everything is becoming simplified shit catered to normies
>>51462233
>IE 6
Enormous support for alll webkit features and looks very new
Someone posted this into another thread, but I think it belong here and I fully agree:
OT
In the good old days of browser companies making browsers for the users (Opera up to 12.x) you were able to configure EVERYTHING per web address
http://help.opera.com/Windows/12.10/en/sitepreferences.html
localstorage, separate widget localstorage, separate userjs storage, Web SQL - you could limit/disable/define everything with fine granularity(disabled, quota, popup if quota exceeded) globally and per domain.
opera:config#PersistentStorage
Can you imagine something as crazy as letting user decide which sites are allowed to run Javascript? use localstorage? leave permanent cookies? use plugins? or something as weird as defining custom useragent string per website? All possible in Old Opera, No other browser will let you do that now afaik.
Today? Today you get Firefox forcing Pocket, Google serving Voice control binary blob, and all around people coming up with things that cant be fine tuned at the user level like webRTC. We are slowly moving to a point (wtf webassembly) to a point we will lose any control over whats flowing down the wire from the server and runs on our computers.
>>51466763
>commit sudoku
Kek'd, commit seppuku you inbred
>>51468226
So firefox wants chrome extensions, right?
Nice
http://labs.detectify.com/post/133528218381/chrome-extensions-aka-total-absence-of-privacy
>>51462709
I use Vivaldi as my main browser now. Looks awesome and performs well, and has a bunch of great features that seem useless but seriously work well. Only problem is that it is unstable and crashes often.
Safari.
>>51471364
For me it doesn't crash, but it performs godawfully.
>>51462233
I just started using Firefox Dev edition since it has multithreading and so far I'm liking it more than Chromium.
>>51466143
>Data compression VPN
>He doesn't know about w3 standard supported gzip and other compressions, nor cdns and script caching
The ninety's called. They want to sell you more gimmicks.
>>51472273
you could put the mobile Safari icon for the second o
Sent from my Retina MacBook Pro
Opera on Windows + Opera on Android linked by Sync MASTER RACE reporting in.
>>51466628
I use edge because I don't want to install Adobe Flash for firefox, can't be assed to install another botnet over this one.
is palemoon actually a decent browser or just a meme?
>>51473080
a meme.
the problem with Firefox isn't anything superficial. not the interface, not added or removed features. the problems are with the underlying engine, Gecko. I don't know whether it got worse, or WebKit/Blink simply surpassed it, but when you use the two side by side, Firefox is just painful to use. It's terribly unoptimised, for both Windows and Android. Switching to Beta, Nightly, Dev, Pale Moon, Waterfox, Cyberfox... none of these will make any real difference, because the underlying engine is the same. What's wrong with Firefox will carry over to any other build or fork.
Either Mozilla has to markedly and rapidly improve Gecko, or hurry up and complete its successor, Servo, or just give up and join the Blink club... or stay unusable and lose its remaining market share.
what does /g/ think about qupzilla?
>NOT based on chromium
>NOT based on firefox
>build on QtWebEngine so probably faster than firefox
>open souce
>windows/linux
>no addons (?) but supports themes and has buildin adblocker
seems like a good alternative to firefox for everyone that doesnt like new firefox changes and is afraid of botnet
>>51473796
fuck, i forgot that if this doesnt have addons it doesnt support 4chanx
>into the trash
Serious question: is it much of a deal having the best HTML5 compatibility? At one point it almost feels like a tool for making Chrome the only choice
>>51466591
>>>/facebook/
>>51474174
>>>/autism/
It jest werks.
>>51474244
You're already here.
>>51473849
4chanX is not an addon.
>>51474253
all major browsers "just werks"
How am I supposed to trust chromium after the incident with the proprietary voice extension eavesdropping on users?
>>51474393
You're not. Just use Firefox.
>>51474303
You either install it as an extension in chrom* or install the greasemonkey script in ff. To anyone without autism that makes it an addon.
>>51462233
I use Chromium.It is basically chrome with that baka flash removed.
I used to use Firefox but android port of firefox is laughably shit.Chrome version is shit too.I have to clear cache every few hours to get it fast.But I kept using chrome because meh sync with android.(Waiting for chromium to come on play store.By the way I will shill for my favourite mobile browser.Its lightning and its the fastest.I use it any time I don't need sync feature)
so is anyone using qupzilla? it has build in greasemonkey but in firefox/chrome version of there was an option to configure some script and i cant find it in qupzilla, is this possible?
>>51474009
HTML is a separate entity. And not everything in HTML 5 is really all that useful beyond "hey did you know you can do this" Unless some amazing new website that most of the planet uses springs us and uses something only chome can use, it won't be a big deal.
If that does happen, the other browsers will push out an update that fixes those standards.
>>51474604
Have you tried Opera? The android version of Opera is objectively better than its Chrome counterpart. Plus Opera Turbo.
Btw, is there a Chromium for Android?
i keep switching between safari and chrome on os x. i have an iphone so safari with icloud sync is kinda nice though handoff also works with chrome + mobile safari. safari looks great and has some great things going with the ux but it's kinda behind on the html5 standards, so there's no webm or clipboard support and you can't even download from mega. it just feels stupid to use safari most of the time and then switch chrome when some site doesn't work, even though there's a neat "open page with" menu for that
>>51474884
No.There is Gello but I think its a standalone browser.
I heard Linux foundation made a build but I am not using that.
>>51473849
Opera 10 didn't support addons but supported js userscripts, to be fair.
>>51474565
See >>51476166
You're like those retards that call daemons, services, programs and processes all "apps"
>>51474253
Soon it wont though.
qupzilla failed on me really hard, trying midori now
>>51477035
>qupzilla
Give me quick review, anon. Thanks!
pale moon is pretty alright if you get past the looking for old versions of extensions and shit, the only issue im having is that its capped at 720p for html5 videos on youtube and i've talked to others and they also have this issue but noone has given me a fix yet.
>>51477088
no 4chanx, it has greasemonkey but it doesnt work, its deal breaker for me, it also has terrible themes and no native look but thats not so important, other than that is a working browser
>4chanx doesnt work with midori either
im going to bed
>>51462827
hahahaha 10/10
>>51477445
Aren't scripts supposed to be cross compatible?
>>51477445
Use Chropera
What does /g/ think of uzbl?
>>51477813
well..
>>51478080
>chromium no privacy issues
that's not something you can take for garanted
>>51478080
Clearly whoever made that never actually used it. The truth is that uzbl:
- is lightweight as fuck
- uses webkit, so renders everything fine
- is designed around moded keyboard commands, like vi
The weakness of it is that it doesn't accommodate mouse controls very well.
>>51478319
there is a newer version, but I can't find it.. eh, I didn't really search that much to begin with. comodo ice/dragon should also be moved somewhere to botnet tier.
>>51478423
>uses webkit, so renders everything fine
broken code for a broken engine. yeah, they work together.
>>51467728
Oh yeah, WP 10 isn't out yet. Makes sense. Unless you're running beta.
Honestly had no idea about Chrome. I'm switching to Opera immediately, and using Edge as backup.
>>51462233
Edge once extensions come
How does this https://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ look in your browser?
>>51479066
It works flawlessly on both Android and Desktop versions of Opera.
>>51479066
Edge fails miserably
>>51479184
Same with Safari
Same with Firefox. So what does this test tell us?
>>51481029
That Opera is the best
>>51479066
>https://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/
>>51481080
why?
>>51478080
bonzo@bonzo-desktop ~ $ uzbl https://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/
No to so bad, elaborate what is so bad about uzbl?
>>51463644
wait. opera supports chrome extensions?! wtf?!? this literally might convince me to switch
>>51466628
It lacks any extensions. That's the reason why no one is really using it.
>>51477445
werks4me
>>51477813
The nice thing about uzbl compared to the other lite webkit meme browsers is that with no tabs, it can't crash when opening a new tab.
I thought it was settled a long time ago that Chromium was fast and lacked the botnet.
>>51479066
Canary
>>51481467
drag and drop image on quick reply is not working for me. how about you?
>Try Midori
>Crashes on boot up
Noice.
>>51479066
Shameful dispaley
>>51479066
lel, just look at source of each of these images, dude almost wrote a book to display it animated
>CSS
Firefox is the best. Its the only one that gives a shit about your privacy and your control as a user and for this I'd put up with it being a little bit slower than whatever botnet shit is out there.
I've never found Firefox to be "slow". Most of the time, it is what the user adds to it. Yeah, if you have a fuckload of extensions, userscripts and styles for every page etc... that have a huge burden and you're loading 50 tabs etc... then yeah, tis going to be a bit slower than if you didn't have those features. Many people who complained of Firefox being "slow" were amazed when I told them to save/backup the important stuff and reinstall Firefox, using it with only a bare minimum of addons (ie uBlock Origin, HTTPS Everywhere and a few others) etc.. suddenly all their complaints about 'slowness' went away.
>>51479066
>>51479184
>>51479332
>>51481029
According to the CSS source the eyebrow has left, right, and top borders, but in Blink, the left and right borders somehow disappear when the border-radius property is added. Clearly Blink is wrong and the other browsers are correct.
>>51484480
>Its the only one that gives a shit about your privacy
Yandex and Opera does the same.
>botnet.
Oh yeah... one of you... no, open source =/= privacy.
>Most of the time, it is what the user adds to it.
The biggest issue is the lag it occurs when a tab is loading a heavy javascript page. Also, yes, more extensions makes Firefox slower, but this doesn't happen with other browsers with the same amount of extensions.
>any people who complained of Firefox being "slow" were amazed when I told them to save/backup the important stuff and reinstall Firefox, using it with only a bare minimum of addons (ie uBlock Origin, HTTPS Everywhere and a few others) etc.. suddenly all their complaints about 'slowness' went away.
So, Firefox has a flaw, and yet you think isn't an issue. To me, that only shows how bad polished is a software. No, it's not ok for the users to have to do what you suggest.
Hey, I like Firefox, there are some neat stuff with it, like how Gecko renders the pages and scrolls them. But it has a lot of flaws that should be pointed and fixed.
>>51478430
>comodo ice/dragon should also be moved somewhere to botnet tier.
Why?
>>51484607
>it doesnt work in my browser
>no, its code that is bugged
>>51462233
I like chromium for general daily use.
I do a lot of SharePoint dev work and for that I recommend whatever MSFT is pushing.
Fuck Firefox. Fuck opera.
Before I used chromium or ie I used lynx and that was really enough.
>>51484851
http://jsfiddle.net/8nm9rjx8/
>>51484920
>lostboy.exe
>>51484757
pls respond
Can someone explain the difference between Firefox Nightly and Firefox Aurora
GOOGLE - ULTRON
>use browser that NASA uses
>>51470640
This.
Opera used to be the best. Not sure about now, everything is kinda shitty. But I still use Opera
>>51487020
The sad thing is, Opera is still the best. Even though it has been shot in the head and replaced by a dressed up Chrome clone.
>>51487504
Opera's been around since 1995? Crazy. Also it invented tabbed browsing.
But all those dropped features tho, so sad.
>>51487504
It's getting better
Who /sidebar/ here?
Chrome for warching flash videos, Firefox for everything else.
>>51466030
Riceeeer fagggggot
>>51466718
>Let's spoonfeed the troll.
>Never heard of tethering to get internet access when not near any means to get a wired connection to the internet
>Should have thought it through before spilling your salt in your replies.
Back to the what is best. Chrome is better overall but it's Skynet so nobody on /g/ is going to actually tell you to use it. Firefox is a resource hog so you have better have a lot of memory in whatever you choose to run it in. You can basically choose between Chromium [chrome without the botnet] or Firefox. There are others but it comes down to these two.
Anyone else use canary?
>>51474393
FUD. Google never hid it and it was for the now dropped "Ok Google" feature.
>>51487504
>dropped
>dropped
>dropped
>dropped
...
I am very sad now.
What's the best browser for watching videos? I use waterfox mainly and its great except html5 never loads and flash is a buggy mess that crashes a ton
