Just installed Arch my dudes
What WM should I install
Bonus points for minimal browsers that match
gnome 3 and google chrome
>>51389659
>not unity
mate and chrome to be honest family
>>51389891
>WM
>suggests DE
fbterm + tmux
>>51389362
i3
w3m
>>51389362
Your favourite.
Firefox.
>>51390957
Firefox is an unoptimized meme browser, use Pale Moon
>>51391001
I will, when I reinstall Arch.
And that depends on how many of my plugins work with Pale Moon.
>>51389659
>Antergos
LXDE + Firefox
>>51389362
WM: xfwm4
Browser: QupZilla
kde and firefox-kde
>>51389915
>implying there is a difference.
In the end you will have the same thing.
whether you see a wm as a DE minus stuff or a DE as a wm plus stuff, the end result is the same.
mutter; any browser ever made
>>51390220
This. Easy to use and fast too.
>not using mate
>not using gnome 2
>>51389362
Dwm
Surf+tab
St
Whatever those weebaoos in the desktop threads have, sexiest desktops around desu
i3 is pretty nice.
well, i don't care if a browser is lightweight or not, i want it to be up2date and stable. chromium is doing its job here...
>>51389362
>What WM should I install
i3-wm if you want to get thist done
awesome/ the haskell one I can't remember the name, herbsspwnwhatever wm, etc if you just want to to rice the shit out of it and call it "serious work".
Stumpwm if you are an emacs user and know what the fuck you're doing. this one also requires some investment making it work for you
ratpoison + firefux
>>51390220
Mein neger
