What a joke.
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
What a joke.
>290 beating a 980
maximum kek
>>51232900
That's what happens when you have a team of competent devs instead of offloading the programming and optimization to Nvidia Goyworks™.
>>51232997
>competent devs
u havin a giggle?
http://www.techpowerup.com/217308/black-ops-iii-12-gb-ram-and-gtx-980-ti-not-enough.html
AMD's Vishera CPUs perform really well here too.
Its a decently graphically intensive game, and it still manages to get solid frame rates, so its not like huge bottlenecks are holding anything down. Its just really well threaded.
>>51233046
Well, I sit corrected.
>>51233069
Even at 1080p (they should've tested at a lower res) that is a damn fine showing for vishera.
How does the 380x do?
>960 pulling 36FPS at 1440p
I should be fine for 1080p then I guess
>>51233180
When its released we'll let you know.
>>51233248
>960
>1440p
Pick only one. The card is so-so at 1080p and 1440p just hammers its weaknesses.
Is this a dx12 title?
>>51233319
No.
>>51233046
>u havin a giggle?
Not the anon you are asking but,
as I read the question I giggled like hell about it.
>>51232900
>$440 2 year old rebrand 390x only 2.5fps slower than the new $650 Fury X with double the cores
Maybe AMDrones should get their shit straight before making fun of others.
I bet Fury owners are... Furious
>>51233895
Do you know how to read graphs?
>>51233142
Barring possibly the 5960x that's a textbook CPU bottleneck. Any lower would be redundant.
>>51235094
True but the lower the resolution the less effect the gpu has. Cranking it down pretty much eliminates the gpu from the equation.
Regardless it shows the game engine can into cores pretty well.
>>51232900
Envydiokeks on suicide watch.
>>51235124
If the GPU was part of the equation then the results would hit a wall.
>>51235203
Not really - games cale well with gpu power until they hit a cpu wall as after all, the cpu will eventually be the limiting factor.
>780ti doing almost no better than am 280x
this is happening more and more this days
>>51235344
That's exactly what I meant in my previous statement.
>>51232900
the game is a clusterfuck anyway, as no matter what you can't get a stable frame rate, and it randomly crashes.
>>51235417
Kepler is aging like milk
Really hope Maxwell holds up better over time
jesus Christ bo3 is optimized horriblly wtf. recommended graphics card is a gtx 470 fr..
they have to fix this because zombies mode actually looks fun
>>51235458
Lol
>pascal
Maxwell is going to be gimped.
>>51232900
I see what they did was utilize the large frame buffers for heavy asset caching, those minimum rates between the 390/290 are no joke (regardless of the actual graphics fedelity)
>>51233248
Then again it's on high settings .... so if you don't mind putting it on 720p plus normal textures then you'll run this game at a solid 60fps
