ITT we post things /g/ loves that are actually fucking horrible.
Pic very related. Use Tomato or OpenWRT, at least those actually work correctly.
>>50773144
>STP
>On a WAN link
Is this 1992?
>>50773150
Autotragic fag detected.
Enjoy falling asleep while driving.
foobar2000
>>50773144
AMEN
It works for me and I don't see your point.
GNU slash Linux
>>50773692
Every router I've had the displeasure of using DD-WRT on has had issues at some point. Either it drops the connections, gives vague error messages (if any at all), disables the web UI constantly, etc. QoS was especially shitty on DD-WRT.
If you don't do a lot with your router it'll work fine, but after that it's a buggy mess. The only virtue DD-WRT has is that it's very widely supported.
>>50773349
>not realizing he meant transmission
>>50773144
except nobody on /g/ ever even talks about dd-wrt, and they love tomato and openwrt.
Reddit thread confirmed!
>>50773693
Bait m8
>>50773760
Asus merlin > all
>>50773144
I agree. I went from using Tomato on my RT-N66U to using DD-WRT on TP-Link WDR3600 when I moved out of my parent's place and setting up QoS was brutal.
Is OpenWRT any easier in setting up QoS?
