>Adblock Edge has been discontinued in favor of uBlock
>gorhill now back in the drivers seat rolling out fixes and features for uBlock Origin for both Chrome and Firefox
>Chris Aljewdi's reputation has been utterly destroyed and he's not even in college yet and probably has cancer or AIDS judging from his video on Youtube
>uBlock is now seeing a huge grassroots following behind it as people are talking about it and the fact that Adblock Plus' company is paid to whitelist Jewgle and other corporations.
For a second there, I thought things were going to take a nosedive but we are back towards version 1.0 and beyond.
What other hurdles do you see in store for our beloved uBlock, the people's choice for their blocking needs?
http://vaughnlive.tv/cajunflixx
>can't select the ads in the video with the element picker
>>47736568
If anything, gorhill's reputation as a person has been utterly destroyed.
>>47736606
>If anything, gorhill's reputation as a person has been utterly destroyed.
How so?
>>47736606
this. gorhill is fucking retarded
>>47736617
He gave it away and then forked his own shit because people made too many comments about it.
>>47736597
>using flash
Top fucking kek, is this 2005?
>>47736617
Refer to the whole story and gorhill's behavior through all of it.
>>47736656
>He gave it away and then forked his own shit because people made too many comments about it.
So what?
Slowpoke
>>47736568
When will he add support for Seamonkey and Pale Moon? For the moment I am using a port done by Vallad, but its chris version...
>>47737178
He's not planning to. Gotta use original uBlock if you want that.
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/136#issuecomment-96630785
>>47736707
he autismed out of it like a true beta. there is a reason anons calling him a cuck.
uBlock or whatever the fuck it is called this week, will now forever be a cuckware.
>>47739241
I'd rather have a cuck as developer than to be the developer's cuck.
>gorhill uses linux mint
How does this make you feel?
>>47739375
don't worry, you will become gorhill's cuck when his second autism fit strikes. someone who is both non-autist/aspergers and non-Jew should fork it so that we won't have to worry about his "man-periods"
>>47739638
Good. He uses an OS that gets shit done and didn't fall for the Arch or Gentoo meme.
>>47739789
that tells me you have never used arch or gentoo
>>47739638
*buntus/Mint and Fedora are the top choices for a desktop distro, what you're talking about?
>>47739638
I may be retarded but how do I get to that menu in ublock origin?
>>47739879
click the top black bar that has the name and version number
>>47739879
Addons
uBlock
Options
Show Dashboard
You retard.
>>47736597
tweet @notmark and call him a faggot for doing that
>>47739638
it just werks
>>47739814
"get shit done" definitely doesn't imply "compile everything".
>>47739879
Gorhill needs a lesson in UX
Took me more then 10 seconds to find it, that's just bad.
Alright, I read in a previously ublock thread that the use of this in addition to Disconnect wasn't necessary if the correct filters were in place.
How does this look /g/? Thanks
>>47741763
>all ublock filters
>reek
>easy list
>easy privacy
That's all you need.
>What other hurdles do you see in store
The fact that it doesn't block everything, unlike AB*?
>>47741835
Prove it
>>47741785
would that fanboy's ultimate list be fine? It includes all the easy lists, or is it just unnecessary bloat?
>>47741835
Nice of the ABP devs to join us tonight :^)
>>47741898
If gorhill had any skill he would make ublock generate a definitive blocklist that has all duplicate entries taken out.
>>47736568
uBlock is shit.
You know it's run by a bunch of idiots if there's this much drama around a simple ad blocking program.
AdBlock Plus just plain works and isn't in beta.
>>47741898
The more lists you have slower it will get. It is like going to robbery. You cant bring 40 ak-70`s. It will make you slow down.
>>47741927
Wladimir pls go
>>47741929
Alright, thanks. So with Easy List, Easy Privacy, Reek, and then the built in filters that should be enough to also stop using Disconnect?
>>47741785
>>47741898
>>47741763
Social Trackers
Addon Annoyance
>>47741927
>>47741978
In real world performance, that means nothing.
Neither uBlock or ABP is going to slow down your computer in any way.
The reason to use ABP is it actually works, is not in beta, while uBlock is a buggy piece of beta crap.
>>47742021
ok, kid.
>>47741987
>>47741977
Thanks a bunch guys. Here is final list. I'll drop Disconnect as well.
>>47742051
Looks good
>>47742021
Can you stop doing this? It's borderline spam
>>47742074
Can't handle the truth?
Try it yourself.
Install ABP, test its speed.
Install uBlock, test its speed.
You will notice...ZERO difference.
>>47742086
>shilling this hard
>>47742086
No mate, I KNOW there is a big difference.
At this point you're just spamming the board with your bullshit
>>47742104
You know?
Have you actually tried it yourself?
I have.
There is zero difference in speed between using uBlock and ABP.
>>47742086
I notice ads with ABP.
http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/02/03/over-300-businesses-now-whitelisted-on-adblock-plus-10-pay-to-play/
>>47742123
Shhhh no tears only dreams now
The time of Adblock Plus is over. All hail ublock
So, thread says you don't need Disconnect, but I still need Noscript right?
>>47742123
not him, but yes, and noticed a huge improvement.
>>47742152
noscript until umatrix gets more firefox fixes
>>47742166
He's gonna replay that it didn't
In this style
Zero difference
>>47742196
Nah if he actually tested it and noticed, then good for him.
If you're running any kind of modern hardware, there is zero difference.
>>47742254
How much they paying you?
>>47742269
Nothing.
I'm just someone who actually tested the software that you're irrationally shilling.
uBlock = buggy beta software
ABP = exact same speed without the bugs
Pretty easy to make a choice there.
>>47742051
you should tick My filters too, if you want anything under My filters to actually works
>>47742284
How much they paying you?
>>47742284
>implying it's beta
>>47742284
You could just say you don't like change.
ABP allows ads by default and is inefficient compared to uBlock Origin.
>>47742351
I'm willing to bet the majority doesn't give a fuck about the whitelisting
ABP makes your browser slow as fuck.
THAT matters.
>>47742284
uBlock = exact same speed without a fuckton of RAM usage
>>47742383
this anon gets it
>>47739638
It saddens me a little, but they all come home to Debian sooner or later.
>>47741865
Browser cache.
>>47741902
I wish. I'm just someone that hates ads and hates a fucking addon that LIES that it blocks ads.
You should too. Oh wait, you're a fucking uShit dev.
>>47742130
>whitelisted
This shit again.
Install ABP.
It TELLS YOU THERE ARE FUCKING "UNOBTRUSIVE ADS" THAT IT DOESN'T BLOCK BY DEFAULT. UP FUCKING FRONT IT TELLS YOU THIS.
AND NOT ONLY TELLS YOU THAT YOU CAN DISABLE THIS SHIT RIGHT THERE ON ITS FIRST INSTALL SCREEN BUT GIVES YOU A FUCKING LINK AND INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO GET TO THE PLACE TO DO IT.
Meanwhile, uShit hides its paid-for ads behind your back and pretends it doesn't to allow "ad" agencies to track you with web bugs and pays uBlock devs to do it.
>>47741918
You obviously cant read code because that's exactly what uBlock does.
>>47742674
Sure Abp shill
>>47742635
>LIES that it blocks ads
how new are you?
>>47742688
I didn't read the code
Thanks for confirming though
>>47742635
>>47742674
The fact that I have to explain this shit and get garbage replies like this >>47742690 every single uShit thread is confirmation that uShit devs are trying so fucking hard to hide their fucking utter FAILURE at making an ad blocker.
The shilling is ridiculous and the circlejerk is almost criminal.
Report this thread, ignore it, and REPORT ALL FUTURE THREADS ON uSHIT.
>>47742698
>new
Oh I dunno, someone that's been in the industry since you were in diapers, child.
I know a fake pile of shit shill-backed piece of software when I see it. I have the knowledge to gather information on it and I know it happens. Stop pretending, shill.
>>47742714
It was proven that uBlock BLOCKS ads.
>>47742714
ok, kid
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Does-uBlock-block-ads-or-just-hide-them%3F
>>47742751
>proven
Funny, one simple look at your browser cache shows anyone that you're wrong.
>>47742714
Is this some bad shilling or some false-flag operation to get people to stop using ABP?
Either way, uBlock wins.
>>47742763
Show me then
RIP ABE
>>47739638
How do you know he isn't testing it on a Mint liveboot / sacrifice install?
do i have to get wireshark or whatever to validate whether ublock is actually blocking?
i ask because, i have it set to block all images by default... and when i click an image link in firefox, the page is blank, as it should be, BUT, the tab shows the favicon of the image, meaning firefox is still downloading the image.
anyone know what is going on?
>>47743514
how did you block them just *.png *.jpg etc?
I'm using ADP right now. Convince me to use ublock
>>47743707
Why? I actually feel good if you keep using inferior technology, I have literally no motivation to convince you otherwise.
>>47743748
Why so bitter?
>>47743643
i have the first column of the dynamic blocking stuff (images, 3rd party, inline scripts, etc) all set to red
I haven't been keeping up with the uBlock drama shit, so should I be using uBlock or uBlock Origin?
>>47743944
Origin
U
SHILLS
CONITNUE
TO
SHILL
EVEN
AFTER
CONFIRMED
JEW
LE
DONATIONS
TIME
:^)
GOOD LE GOYIM
USHILLING CONTINUES
>>47744028
>not donating
So what filters should be used? I have ultimate list and a whole bunch of other things ticked because I have no idea what conflicts/is better, outside of the things that ultimate covers.
>>47744432
maybe you could actually read >>47742051
also: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki
>>47736664
Stupid question here, how do you get by without flash for some video and porn websites? Do you just use html5players, youtube-dl and similar things or are there other tools and scripts I don't know of? I use Firefox on xubuntu that helps
>>47744555
Didn't see that there was a post about that earlier, I assumed there were no idiots aside from me in here. Also, I read over the entire wiki some time ago, and not once did gorhill ever explain anything about what filters to use.
This fucking ABP dev is destroying my sides
>>47744601
not him but if you browse many sites for videos you can't avoid it, there is always one using flash
>>47744621
default lists are usually ok, if you don't know what you are doing.
best is to use dynamic filtering in default deny mode https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Dynamic-filtering:-default-deny
>>47736606
nah, it definitely took a hit but his current actions are now undoing that
So can you spoonfeed me what's the OFFICIAL uBlock repository and is it available on the mozilla addons website already? Not the jewified version.
>>47744850
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/
>>47744850
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock
>>47744862
> Not the jewified version.
ublock origin- april 27 last updated
ublock-april 22 last updated
I thought it would be the other way around.
>>47744995
ublock is maintained by a 17 year old jew
ublock origin is maintained by the original developer
>>47743514
Favicons are downloaded as a behind-the-scene resource, which are whitelisted by default.
>youBlock
why should I use a plugin that blocks me instead of ads, like adblock?
