[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
2015 iMac Concept
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 45
Thread images: 10
File: image.jpg (79 KB, 1368x912) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
79 KB, 1368x912
What does /g/ think of this concept for the 2015 iMac. It's a throwback styled computer and the ports are unknown.
>Post feels about this 2015 iMac concept.
http://9to5mac.com/community/odd-mac-concept/
>>
I think you need to stop posting this stupid fucking thread about that stupid piece of shit sheet metal.
>>
It's like console mockups all over again. Dat portable Gamecube.
>>
i like it.
>>
File: PanasonicQ[1].jpg (219 KB, 1276x1037) Image search: [Google]
PanasonicQ[1].jpg
219 KB, 1276x1037
>>47545945
Don't worry. This thread is now about the Panasonic Q.

Discuss.
>>
>>47545991
I like.
>>
Too much metal. Apple would not make as much profit from sales.
>>
It's horrible, but design is just a question of brand anyways, so it will be well received by the weak minded crowd.
>>
>>47545908
The iCult is just being "new" and "flashy" to appeal to the mindless drones that keep them alive, and would buy their shit if it was literally shit. Nothing new here.
>>
>>47546014
this is where you're wrong, apple values it's metals and prices accordingly. i mean they will sell you $800 worth of gold for the low low price of $13,000
>>
File: image.jpg (52 KB, 500x293) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
52 KB, 500x293
>>47546097
>>47546142
Isn't my fault your shitty brand cannot innovate, that's why Apple is mastercomputer.
>>
>>47546163

i fail to see where i named a brand chief i just said they charge out the ass for metals
>>
>>47546163
>Implying I have a brand
>>
File: 1428591248745.png (11 KB, 402x383) Image search: [Google]
1428591248745.png
11 KB, 402x383
>>47546163
>innovate
>>
>>47546204
>Implying you aren't a Lenovo shill.
>>47546233
Yes, something that is clearly a issue.
>>47546198
Not only for the metals, you have the entire computer and everything you'd need to use the product.
>>
>>47545991
A $439 gamecube that played dvd's. The concept was so stupid, I wonder if anyone that actually bought it was mentally capable of swiping their credit card.
>>
>>47545991
what i find questionable is the descision to print the labels on the outer-side of the mirrored front's glass, because it reflects off the mirrored back making a wierd double image and is thus less legible, especially for such a small font. overall sorta feels designed by an intern.
>>
>>47546270
so you're telling me that the gold iwatch that has literally 800-2000 worth of gold in it is worth $13000 because it has better internals?

and as for computers they use everything everyone else in the industry uses, they charge for materials and a logo. they're a design firm not a technology firm.
>>
File: 2c.jpg (34 KB, 1368x912) Image search: [Google]
2c.jpg
34 KB, 1368x912
Daily reminder that the 3.5mm headphone port is what's keeping your computer from being thinner.
>>
>>47546270
>Implying you aren't a Lenovo shill.
I'm not. Lenovo is just as bad as the iCult when it comes to making products with the sole purpose of destroying freedom.
>>
>>47545908
It's pretty cute. I see what they're doing there with the throwback design. But I'd still prefer the current iMac design of sliced in half monitor. I can see this new one being horribly overpriced (like the new macbook) when the existing ones are at a more decent price (vs specs).
>>
>>47545908
>concept
Go away.
>>
File: image.jpg (35 KB, 511x403) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
35 KB, 511x403
>>47546338
Well, this is caused by the issue of computers becoming absolute shit. I mean compare a 2007 ThinkPad to this.
>>
File: 1373367504749.jpg (98 KB, 343x317) Image search: [Google]
1373367504749.jpg
98 KB, 343x317
>>47546336
Why are people so obsessed with making things thinner?
Like all those TVs that come out boasting about how thin it is. Why does it matter? How often are you looking at it from the side?
Is it that much lighter or something?
I really don't see anything that great about technology becoming thinner. Aesthetically it's even pretty "eh" after a certain thinness.
>>
>>47545908
thing is, i actually really like this aesethic-wise, but functionally, a monitor that small with non-adjustable height makes litterally no sense. it's placed really high in the first place and actually manages to be angled upwards making this problem worse. niether does that slit in the front where the old floppy drive would be make any sense. in order for that to be a disc drive, the computer would have to exist in non-euclidian space. theres no room. niether does there appear to be much room for actual hardware, unless the machine is anemic powerwise, but having something that underpowered without it also being portable doesn't make much sense either. and it's a given that it'll be expensive, so theres that to.
>>
>>47546336
Do you know what heating means?
>>
>>47545908
so this is what computing from the future looks like
>>
>>47546437
^i'm this guy

this is a real product? so i guess the floppy slit is a card slot or something?
>>
>>47546406
It's not that it's shit. I mean, it is, but that's not the point. The point is that people shouldn't be using hardware that they didn't build.
>>
File: disgusting.jpg (29 KB, 499x500) Image search: [Google]
disgusting.jpg
29 KB, 499x500
It looks so fucking retarded, oh my god. Whoever made this is a huge fucking retard who thinks he's a designer because he can create a few polygons and click render in shitema4dicks.
>>
>>47546426
thinness was a big deal in the age when the most affordable display technology was CRT. nowadays people are surpassing the range of comfortably thin to the unnecesarily thin
>>
>>47545991
I like the idea of multiple choice consoles. That jvc with the genesis you could plug in. All those 3do models. This. Sure they were mostly overpriced crap, but I like the idea that others could make their own.
>>
File: 8.jpg (65 KB, 1368x912) Image search: [Google]
8.jpg
65 KB, 1368x912
>>47546437
What high shelf are you placing your computers on? It's an homage to the original Macintosh which stood just under 14 inches tall. Based on this image, it stands maybe 15-16 inches. The desk I'm sitting at, 16" is about chin height. I'd actually be looking downwards at this if I didn't set it on top of something.

The floppy drive "slot" has an SD card reader instead.
>>
>apple fanboy sites

Who gives a shit
It's literally fanboy wank
>>
>>47546317
I'm not that guy, but the reason it's $13000 is because people will pay $13000. Not you, not me, but the people who don't mind laying down thousands of dollars on watches.
Having a gold iWatch is like saying you can afford a $16000 watch whenever you are outside.
>>
>>47546469

I'm this guy >>47546580

It's a design concept.
http://www.engadget.com/2015/01/13/curved-labs-mac-concept-brings-the-original-mac-up-to-date/

Source, if you can read kraut:
https://curved.de/news/curvedlabs-ein-facelift-fuer-den-macintosh-198570
>>
File: Apple_iPlay.gif (37 KB, 250x319) Image search: [Google]
Apple_iPlay.gif
37 KB, 250x319
>>47545945
>>
Can i stick my dick in it? Whats the point of the floppy reader?
>>
this was a joke, wasn't it? I mean it was some concept design by some enthusiast or whatever, but that was it.

Are you guys really so autistic that you didn't catch that?
>>
I hope that concept is only a joke.
But, if is serious, then Apple has lost his way.
>>
>>47546473
>build
i think you mean "assemble"
>>
>>47546688
>1945+70
>Not building his own CPU/GPU/Phone

What a pleb
>>
>>47546271
You mean a gamecube that could play burned games on dvd
>>
>>47545908
*tips imac*
>>
>>47547068
underrated post
Thread replies: 45
Thread images: 10

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.