Let's all use .PNG since everyone's got fast broadband and terrabytes of storage.
>>47196418
no.
tiff master race.
There's nothing better than seeing artwork rendered losslessly in perfect PNG quality!
>>47196437
>tiff
>not .bmp
>>47196455
>.bmp
>not .raw
>>47196418
please dont i have hughesnet
>>47196447
>not optimising your .pngs
>>47196418
But Anon, smaller file sizes are better for low storage and bandwidth. Why would you want to use jpg?
>>47196418
I'd love to use high res images all the time with PNG, but 4cdn is so fucking slow.
>>47196418
>since everyone's got fast broadband
seriously nigger
>>47196502
png: 23k
jpg: 68k
>But Anon, smaller file sizes are better for low storage and bandwidth. Why would you want to use jpg?
Different format for different situations.
>>47196551
Yes and?
Are you repeating what I'm saying or just having trouble with reading comprehension?
>>47196501
may i ask what quantizer software you used?
i've been using pngnq but yours has even nicer dithering
>>47196466
>.raw
>not .everything_padded_with_1_TB_of_zeros
>>47196678
>not doing this with a squashfs partition
>>47196455
tiff is 16 bit.
bmp is only 8 bit pleb tier shit
>>47196466
>.raw
that doesn't exist.
Also, assuming you meant raw instead of .raw:
Unedited photographs look like shit.
>>47196693
I have optimized your png
Into a superior jpg
>>47196447
svg is more perfect than png
>>47196660
i just used this website
https://tinypng.com/
