Find a better bang-for-your buck laptop than pic related for $500 or less
>protip: you can't
Hard mode: no used chinkpads or other used laptops allowed
Specs for laptop in pic related [Aspire E5-551-T5SV]:
>28nm Kaveri A10-7300 APU
19 watt TDP
4 cpu-cores @ 1.9 - 3.2 GHz
384 gpu-shaders @ 533 MHz
>4GB dual-channel DDR3L RAM
>15.6" screen @ 1366 x 768 res
>Bluetooth 4.0
>802.11b/g/n wifi
>6-cell 5000 mAh battery
>500GB HDD
>720p webcam
>>46834449
>AMD
Stopped reading.
>>46834449
>your buck
You mean do OP's shopping and research? No thanks.
>>46834449
>1366
Stopped reading.
>>46834449
>15.6"
Stopped reading.
Oh boy Acer, sure hope you'll enjoy your laptop Anon, make sure to check how long the guarantee lasts since you'll be getting a new laptop right after it expires.
>>46834469
>>46834479
Well what else did you expect for a laptop that sells for 450 fucking dollars. This laptop would actually be enough to play some games on 720p on medium settings. Pretty impressive if you ask me.
>>46834449
You are really pushing the limits of cheap laptop manufacturing OP. I really doubt you could get a better laptop especially since it has a more powerful iGPU than any Intel iGPU.
>ASS PYRE
>>46834449
>19w tdp apu, 5000mah battery
That's bretty gud. I have a laptop from HP and it has a 35w tdp a10-4600 apu, 4000mah battery. I get 2-3 hours of life if I underclock the quad-core cpu to 1.6ghz. You could easily get over 4 hours of battery life if you just surf the web and play a few flash games.
Nobody, nobody at all can find a better laptop? I guess OP wins.
>>46834531
>muh specs
>muh gaymen
kek
>windows 8.1
So it has secure boot. Fuck that.
>1366x..., 15.6"
Nope
>APU with unknown linux support
Nope
>Acer build quality
$500 and it only lasts two years!
>>46834852
Chromebook
Fuck your gaymer specs
>>46834469
Why would anyone want intel CPUs? They make laptops overpriced and have the shittiest iGPUs ever
>>46835028
>>46835042
Can't wait to hear what better option you can come up with for $500 or less.
>>46835042
Please go back to >>>/v/
>>46835067
http://www.amazon.com/Toshiba-CB35-B3340-13-3-Inch-Chromebook-Full-HD/dp/B00N99FXIS/
Doesn't have a screen that will rape your eyes or cooling that will burn your balls.
>>46835042
Shit I did not mean to quote you, I meant to quote this nigger >>46835036
>>46835042
>Intel GPUs
>Shit
We're not in 2008 anymore. Enjoy having 3 hours of battery on any of the "powerful" iGPUs.
>>46835091
>3 hours
More like 3 minutes. At least it will shut off fast enough before it starts sterilizing your testicles.
>>46835083
>Intel HD graphics
nope.jpg
>>46835109
*tips gaymen laptop*
>1366x768 on a 15" screen
>$500
Smartphones have 4k resolution and are cheaper then that.
This shit is absolutely pathetic. Why is this garbage tier resolution still being pushed as "standard" in small to mid sized laptops?
That's also a garbage deal OP. What the fuck is up with the laptop market? Maybe in 2009 you could justify getting a laptop with those specs at that price, but its 2015.
Lenovo G510
Paid it 500 € exact at Media World
Intel Core i5 quad core 4th gen, clock speed 2.4 ghz or so.
8gb of DDR3 ram. (Easily expandable up to 16)
Gpu is an Amd Radeon HD 8570
1tb hdd, 7900 rpm
720p display
Pretty decent. Can edit video on external monitor fairly well.
Did i win?
>>46835131
I get that laptops should not be used for gaming but 16 GB SSD is the only onboard storage for >>46835083
What. The. Fuck.
>>46835164
>I carry 1 TB of chinese cartoon porn on my laptop so I can fap on the go
>>46834497
>mfw got an acer 2 and a half years ago
>has a CPU+dedicated GPU that match or outperform most laptops in the $550-650 range
>it cost $560~ when I got it
>still runs completely fine
Only downsides is that it has a shit 1366x768 TFT and a 3-4 hour battery life if I'm actually doing anything on it; but it's hard to expect that much more when it has a 2.5GHz i5 and a GT630m in it.
>>46835102
And then the heat cycles will break the GPU's substrate and the display will begin flickering.
>>46835151
Again, a 720p display. What the fuck is this shit?
Why would anyone want a low resolution like that in 2015? It's just inexcusable.
1080p should be the STANDARD for laptops these days, and even that is a minimum standard. 3k at the very least should be in most mid range laptops, and high end laptops should be pushing 4k.
720p or this garbage 1366x768 resolution needs to go extinct. It's absolutely archaic these days, especially since making 4k monitors is not expensive at all in comparison.
>>46835151
Dam, that's noice. Too bad it was just a one time thing, wish I had bought it for that price. Must be like $800 now.