Post PNG files, I will attempt to compress them
>>46817725
>>46817706
Please compress this
>>46817783
Thank you. You cut it down more than half the original filesize and it still looks great.
You are very good at this.
>>46817706
>>46817795
>>46817857
Damn it
>>46817826
>>46817854
What do u use for compression?
>>46818060
not jpg that's for sure
>>46817706
I could not help noticing your png was not optimized.
>>46818188
>>46818060
PNGOut, PNGSlim, OptiPNG, PNGCrush
Probably one of those methods.
>>46818202
needs more jpg
Your images crash the image decoder in Android (Clover crashes).
>>46818202
me too
ITT:elite computer operators
OP are you editing the PNGs in vim and just removing random shit in the text representation, and then hoping the image doesn't corrupt? Because that's the only way to explain this magic
OMG OP can into using a command line tool
he must be such an 1337 h4xx0r
>>46818450
No, this is 100% lossless, the decoded bitmaps are identical
>>46818465
Who is the pig looking man you posted, anon?
What does he have to do with technology?
>>46818381
>downloads a PNG optimizer
>starts thread with 4mb png that only has 9kb of info
here you go:
https://tinypng.com/
how is this technology?
>>46817997
>>46818638
he's doing something with his computer, I guess.
>>46820159
sure
>>46817706
>>46821211
>>46821276
>>46821288
>>46821317
>>46821317
>>46821400
Thank you! it doesn't look any different, how did you do that? I made that .png out of a .jpg at "max" compression in GIMP...
Is this a new proprietary .png compression algo? Pretty cool.
>>46821434
You... you turned it into a .webm with only 8kbs.. how...??? It also looks much worse...
>>46821508
>>46821577
>>46821492
That's how video works. It removes a lot of redundant information in video. In a single image, that information isn't actually redundant.
>>46821595
>>46817706
>pic is you
>>46817706
>>46821734
>>46821790
OP is #rekt
>>46821816
>>46821846
This is actually 513 bytes smaller than >>46821816.
>>46821734
amidoinitrite
>>46821790
lol
OP rekt some other guy last time.
>>46821880
>>46817706
OP just discovered png has been compressable for the last 25 years and wants to share his new discovery.
>>46821880
Here.
Still, I don't understand how OP can do better. Must be PNGOUT or something proprietary.
>>46821871
This isn't healthy anon.
You do this shit all day every day.
You're sick. You need to stop now.
>>46821880
Software Paint.NET v3.36
Are you a wizard?
>>46821937
gimp is for losers.
>>46821902
You will never match my level.
>>46821400
Rekking OP
>>46817706
>>46822050
pls
>>46821902
>>46821996
PNG Smaller's image is identical, test1.png is different from the original
>>46821880
>>46821889
>>46821897
>>46821897
Why do you guys care so much how he does it? It seems like everyone on here just wants to learn the magician's secret, so that his work can be undervalued and everyone can compress PNGs just like him. The point is that if we don't know how he does it, it makes it seem magical and great. There is so much mysticism in the technology world with softwares that people don't understand, but everyone just wants to shed light on it and ruin that.
I honestly think its a kind of communism-lite idea brought on by the free software movement. People who use only open-source software, they might not have malware or botnets to deal with, but they will never dream. they will never know the nostalgic feeling of discovering the ins and outs of how a program works, or finding a secret easter egg and keeping it to a limited group of friends and impressing everyone else with it. They think they are the masters of their software, but they are masters of a glass box with everything revealed, they don't understand exactly what the point of not understanding the software is.
You, OP, are a cool person and I hope you keep compressing PNGs and blowing people the fuck out .
Software having backdoors and shit is an entirely separate issue btw, but the point remains that when everyone understands how something is done, it devalues those who found out first, and that's honestly pretty sad. What's the point of doing anything special when it can just be copied from someone pressing a button? Do you really want a society like that?
>>46822210
Do you have any mental issues?
>>46822029
>>46822210
You know what, youre right. Linux users have the source handed to them, that isn't hardcore, that's the epitome of a casual. They didn't have to figure out anything or do any reverse engineering themselves.
>>46822252
Incredible, you guys have nearly reduced its size by 200KB, this is amazing. I can post this on some websites I couldn't before. If anyone needed an argument for competition vs monopoly, here you go.
>>46822303
Not exactly. They used a lossy method (pngquant) to compress it, and I all I did was compress it again.
The images I post are always identical to the one I reply to, even if the person I reply to didn't post an identical image.
>>46822193
what game is that?
>>46822474
>>46822506
NFS Most Wanted 2005
OP I'm waiting >>46822193
>try to upload a single #0000FF pixel
>no comment, no creation time
>Error: Your image contains an embedded file
Why?
>>46822613
I just tried that too.
Fucking new moot.
>>46822613
It sounds like a default branching condition in 4chan software. 4chan doesn't understand this specific file so it assumes to be an image with an embedded file.
>>46822193
>>46822705
Noice.
Two more, above 4MB limit
http://www24.zippyshare.com/v/dl16SzDl/file.html
http://www24.zippyshare.com/v/LIOJ9Q8z/file.html
>>46818352
Yeah, what the fuck?
>>46822682
>>46822071
>>46822833
http://i.cubeupload.com/62Ugkm.png
>>46822613
4chan rejects any image with more than 12 bytes per pixel.
>>46822833
http://www54.zippyshare.com/v/SUZdzwP5/file.html
>>46823353
>any image
*any JPEG or PNG image
>>46823173
>>46823355
Noice!
>>46822210
what the fuck
>>46823480
Fuck you pony fag, go to your board
>can't post a big PNG that I want crushed
>can't get it crushed
>that fucking feel when
>>46821288
I had another go at it.
>>46823586
>>46822210
I run some web based services that dispense static images. If I could shrink them further I could save bandwith and money, as well as improving user experience
>>46823633
Make, or find, your own way to compress.
>>46823658
I already have, but they aren't as optimal. Are you not paying attention?
>>46823684
Well if OP found a way to do it better than you then you haven't looked hard enough.
>>46823595
RIP op
>>46823735
He should have posted it on /mlp/ and then crosslinked it.
>>46823735
I hope the mods have already shoved their dragon dildos in their wide open holes and just deleted the image and not banned him.
>>46822985
>>46823907
>>46823560
http://cubeupload.com/
http://zippyshare.com/
>>46823804
Thank god mods are not total fucking fucktards.
>>46823983
>not using pomf
>>46823999
>not using uguu
>>46823999
Why everything have to have anime shit in it?
>>46823715
Nice baseless assumption you got there.
>>46824045
what's the point of this
>>46824082
I don't see how that bloated website can be compared to uguu
>>46824020
>using something that doesn't support multiple uploads at once
>>46824114
What's so special about thinkpads?
>>46824138
They have clits
>>46824071
What's the point in anything
>>46824114
>>46824317
>that disgusting banding on the glare
You failed.
>>46824343
it was lossy compression
>>46824343
That's not OP tho
>>46824388
jesus that's a sexy looking laptop. why do so many laptops insist on being so ugly? i'm in the market for one right now and so many of them look faddish. i'm going to be using the damn thing for years on end and they insist on trying out weird styles and quirky ideas.
>>46824114
>>46824453
Fujitsu is the brand for you.
The t902 is legendary but the screen resolution isn't great.
The T935 is really good if you're into decent battery life, wacom digitizers, 1440p IGZO displays and thin metal uni-bodies.
Do it goy
>>46825207
Give it a nose, while you are at it.
>>46821317
>>46825253
you're a real mensch!
>>46825305
how2compress pngs?
![SHOOP_DA_WHOOP_TEMPLATE_by_Trudetski[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/RnQJhSF.png "SHOOP_DA_WHOOP_TEMPLATE_by_Trudetski[1].png")
>>46825949
>>46826051
>>46826029
>>46826046
>>46826461
>>46826046
That's already been compressed to shit as jpeg. No reason to keep it as png.
>>46826533
Contains both vector and raster elements. Should be webp if anything.
>>46826104
Tried to clean it a little. Oddly, it made it bigger.
>>46827033
Whatever anime that is, I want to watch it now.
>>46826282
>>46827033
>>46818499
>4 millibits
>>46827042
>>46827177
>>46827042
Is she aroused from sniffing her own hair?
>>46827259
Yes.
>>46827265
damn
>>46827259
>her
>>46827881
>young
>>46827872
>>46817706
fuck PNGs, optimize JPGs!
>>46828428
>>46828413
>>46828669
lossless?
>>46828672
Yes, decoded bmp is the same
>>46828381
Why isn't there a more efficient picture compression method in wide use right now?
There is Jpeg2000 for example. Why did these concepts of creating a better/more advanced version of JPEG all die?
>>46823999
Pretty sure pomf is going to go down soon. The dev's not taking in enough donations to keep it up and fags keep abusing of the service.
>>46828812
Compress harder.
>>46830965
reported
>>46830965
I preserve png chunks for true losslessness. One can obtain an infinitely small file if the data is compromised
>>46830678
WebP
>>46833023
best waifu
>>46833023
Where did you find this picture of me
>>46826163
It was an archive turned in to a png, but when I decode your version it's corrupted
>>46833023
fappetyme
>>46835438
