Apple fags in the suicide watch
>>https://medium.com/@brentonhenry/security-flaw-in-os-x-displays-all-keychain-passwords-in-plain-text-a530b246e960#.yz40oyyum
>>55473437
>A flaw is found in OS X
>/g/ is surprisingly quiet about it
>A flaw is found in GNU/Linux
>Over 9001 threads get made about it.
Nice to see /g/ is showing what their real priorities are, bunch of cocksuckers.
Not surprising really, we've always known OS X to be a dogshit unusable OS. Doesn't help that you also have to buy overpriced laptops with dual-core processors running at 0.8 GHz. I kinda expect them to have constant fuck-ups like this now.
quoted from the comments:
This is by design. The login keychain contains all the user passwords which are to be unlocked when a user logs in. It is a much a “security flaw” as is letting someone use you computer while you’re logged in. In other words, it kinda involves abandoning all hope of security in the first place.
Or as Douglas Adams put it:
>“Oh yes, I thought of something,” panted Ford.
Arthur looked up expectantly.
>“But unfortunately,” continued Ford, “it rather involved being on the other side of this airtight hatchway.”
>>55473526
It's not that. OS X is a joke operating system and we expect things like this desu.
>>55473526
Make /g/ great again.
>>55473535
/thread
>>55473532
>>55473549
Found the ignorant fags
>>55473560
I used to own a macbook so I know what I'm talking about. OS X is a joke, plain and simple.
>>55473556
never was
>>55473573
4chan was never great, but it used to be better.
>>55473572
'x is a joke'
-/g/
>>55473437
Wow, it's fucking nothing. You keychain is decrypted when you log in, just like your hard drive is decrypted on boot.
>>55473526
Macfag here. This shit's so insecure of course no-one's surprised.
It's dog bites man.
>>55473606
Then, it is comfy but insecure_
>>55473535
So pretty much like Firefox showing all login and password credentials you saved in your options.
>>55473437
>The method consists of opening up terminal, and cutting and pasting the following code:
>security dump-keychain -d login.keychain > keychain.txt
That's expected behavior. Nobody shits on linux(gnu,bsd) for being able to type rm -rf ~?
>>55473671
But don't you see anon, it has 'OSX' and 'Security flaw' in the tile?
And everyone know apple is for fags xD
>>55473572
>Used too
So you have no room to talk
>>55473699
Did he strike a nerve unintentionally?
>>55473437
Damn it's a good thing I don't let unauthorized users use my shit. Pretty much a non-issue for anyone I can imagine.
>>55473606
Kys
>>55473711
>Not on topic
Kys kiddo
>requires physical access to an unlocked device
wow it's fucking nothing
>>55473646
Equally retarded, yes.
There's a reason you wouldn't store plain text passwords on a mysql database, for example. Increased security. You're obviously not “supposed" to let unauthorized people read your database anyway.
>>55473437
Just tried it in the 10.11.6 beta
Doesn't work. Still asks for permission.
>doesn't use macOS
>>55473718
>Kiddo
Hello grandpa!
>>55473827
Nice comeback kiddo
>>55473803
It always asks for permission, doesn't it?
Isn't the whole thing someone has to be sitting at a logged in machine?
Also tried it on 10.11.6. Asks me to type in my user password to unlock the keychain
>>55473437
this happens like once a months, macfags are well trained to ignore the GAPING security holes of their fisher price os
>>55473437
>normies are getting their passwords stolen
i dont see a problem with this, or does anyone who actually cares about what they are doing use osx/macos un-ironically?
>>55473526
It's not a big deal because nobody sane thought os x was the pinnacle of security before your thread.
>>55475404
>>55475470
>>55475484
samefag/10
>>55473526
No sane person is using OS X. This doesn't affect us.
>>55473532
It's funny because Linux security is pretty fucking dogshit too. There's a reason why shitdroid has so many exploits popping up every day. If Linux was even close to Windows in popularity the number of vulnerabilities that people know about would fucking skyrocket past Windows' historical vulnerabilities.
>>55473786
It can be done remotely.
Read the full article next time.
>>55475698
>>55473437
just tried this and I had to go through like 50 system dialogs before it would make the file
i'm on el capitan, not the latest version of it
>>55473526
Nobody cares about OSX because the 10 people who use OSX deserve to get their shit pushed in.
>using keychain
there's the problem
>>55475698
nope, im >>55475470 and im not even sure why would you think anons with somewhat similar opinions are the same fag
you used osx/macos to post that didnt you?
you poor normie child...
>>55475875
>Using OS X
This is the real problem. I think you can already install Windows 7/8.1 on aplel computers.
Then don't let people on your computer while they're logged into your user account? It's just like Autofill. It's trusting that the user in front of the computer is authorized.
>>55475786
>It can be done remotely.
If ssh is enabled and you have a password. Jeez
>>55475941
>reading HipsterNews
>trusting anything they say
>>55475910
>wanting to run pajeet OS that is literally slapped together
>>55476036
b-b-b-b-better post anti apple pictures
>>55475941
>>55473671
Who the fuck cares lets better shitpost memes like toddleros, pajeet and fagOS
>>55473526
No one cares about osx, that's why.
test
>>55473437
>in the suicide watch
Is this supposed to mean something ?
>>55473437
Meh, pop a live cd in any OS and everythings yours too. I won't fault the Macfags on this one.
>>55477037
bc exploit==backdoor?
>using keychain
>not using a mac as a mobility whore and nothing else?
>Keeping anything sensitive on a mac
Wew
>keychain
That's why I never set that shit up.
>>55473556
Underrated
>>55473535
>. It is a much a “security flaw” as is letting someone use you computer while you’re logged in.
It is a security flaw because you want to restrict what that possible is does on your computer. In addition you don't want somebody who can suddenly guess the password to have control over your computer.
Not that it matters OSX will never be secure as look as it's stuck on x86.
>>55473437
>2016
>Not using Keepass and storing the password in a safe rigged with c4.
>>55483715
>It is a security flaw because you want to restrict what that possible is does on your computer
Nope
>>55483715
>you don't want somebody who can suddenly guess the password to have control over your computer.
that's one hell of an insight.
>>55484853
You just because you have a password for your user account for your OS doesn't mean that you don't encrypted your document, and files.
>>55484856
You underestimate social engineering.
>take anon's thinkpad running arch
>open firefox
>go view all passwords
HOLY SHIT LINUX BTFO
