She's got criminal charges coming her way and she's banned from all LA fitness locations. What a dumb cunt. Learn how to make fun of people behind their backs properly, you skank.
She stated it was an accident lol.
>>37943852
no where does this say "accident"
>>37943826
>criminal charges
Which exactly?
In what way is "body shaming" illegal?
Just posting pics of ppl without permission?
>>37943852
Whoops!
>>37943826
is that supposed to be a woman?
>>37943863
posting naked pictures of someone on the internet without their permission is a pretty big deal
>>37943863
Are you fucking retarded
>>37943862
She claims it was an accident in the article and on her snap chat she released a video saying she didn't mean to send it to everyone, just a friend.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3689780/Playboy-model-Dani-Mathers-sparks-furious-backlash-body-shaming-naked-woman-Snapchat.html
>>37943826
I think that's kinda funny, even if a little at poor taste
it's not like that woman is recognizable
>>37943863
Lol
She put out naked photos of someone on the internet without their consent. That's a pretty big fucking deal.
>>37943826
It was wrong sorry guise.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8z2KC74n4o
it's pretty funny how bad this has fucked her
she deleted her twitter, her instagram, lost her radio job and there's probably way more to come
oops!
>taking photos of naked people in locker rooms
how stupid do you have to be?
>>37943826
>>37943872
>>37943886
can't tell what gender that is, shouldn't legally count as a person
>>37943897
Video from here snap.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8z2KC74n4o [Embed]
>people being grossed out by naked people in a locker room/spa, where people are supposed to be naked
what is wrong with americans?
also:
>in sauna at gym, towel loosely draped over genitalia to ensure maximum steam:skin ratio
>women in full workout gear amble in, chatting like cows
>yoga leggings
>shirts and bras
>SNEAKERS
u-unsanitary
>>37943826
Shit for brains really.
Bodyshaming is just a sjw fatpeople meme, but actually taking pictures of naked people in the gymshower without consent and uploading them to your popular social media account is pretty shitty thing to do.
She herself would probably sperg out completely if you took a picture of her in the morning without makeup and uploaded it.
>>37943937
dog bless america
It's actually great news, that kind of girl only come for attention and social media (such as snapchatting random shit) and waste their time at the gym (pretty sure she was doing knee bends with the smith machine).
Also, is she dressed in a sauna or what?
>>37943960
Yeah and on her phone? Is that shit safe?
>>37943960
This.
Weight lifting gloves in the sauna? And covering your mouth with that nasty shit? Clearly just wearing that shit to look like she lifts, not because she actually lifts.
set snapchat for autoroast
>>37943960
She is hot... she obviously is doing something right in the gym
>>37943826
She should sue the model and LA Fitness for $$$. How is this different from Erin Andrews getting millions??
>>37943960
i love girls prancing around while im working out tho.
>>37943826
wtf I hate women now?!?
>>37943987
genetics x f
don't be fat x f
Literally all it takes for womemes
>>37943987
>that cardiobunny physique
>probably does dumbell deadlifts
nah shes probably doing more right in the kitchen
>>37943863
It's because she didn't do it anonymously...
>>37943987
The bolt-ons help to make her look more fit.
>>37944002
>skinny chick with fake tits, lips, hair and botox
Boring as fuck, why do so many niggas praise women like this? Shit's pathetic and makes them act like entitled bitches by giving them so much value.
>>37943826
What a cunt.
>>37943826
>She's got criminal charges coming her way
What are these charges? Sounds like a civil case to me
this is unironically the ugliest """"""""model""""""""" i've ever seen.
>>37943987
>surgery couldn't fix her face.
>fake motherfucking tits.
>scrawny.
Any girl could get her body with a surgeon and running around, I bet she spends 1h on the treadmill and then proceeds to curl 0.5lbs dumbbells (with gloves).
>>37943875
Love the way she refers to "something that can seem silly in a private conversation." So...you will continue to do this sort of thing privately, but now you know it's wrong to do it in public. Why she thought it was OK to take a picture of a naked patron of the gym, and then post it is beyond me. This woman will be able to tell, from the time stamp on the post, that she has been exposed on the internet in her altogether. The gym can get sued. Ms. Mathers should get sued. Just because she's fine parading her bits in the nude doesn't mean she has a right to force public nudity on someone else, or to humiliate it by making it seem their body is somehow scarring to others. She is, most definitely, not very intelligent.
>>37944002
>>37944025
>>37943931
>>37943865
>>37943826
>cunt with multiple plastic surgery operations on herself body shaming a woman with no plastic surgery
ebin
>>37943905
She was still so attention starved that she had tho share the photo with everyone with her face in it.
>>37944043
Is she half nigger?
>>37944048
well, at least her lipid profile will come back in the good range tho.
>>37943960
People don't normally go naked in Saunas in America.
its funny because people only care because she is attractive and more famous than them
>>37944083
Yea when you have a certain status everything you do is magnified.
>>37944043
Agreed,
Ears and Nose are far too ugly, mouth has beyond the normal amount of teeth I want to see smiling at me.
It must be all that sun she is getting, giving her some terrible wrinkles.
>>37943937
>>37943960
>>37943973
>wearing ANYTHING in sauna
>burgers in charge of sauna culture
>>37943897
You can see her lips writhe as she says "that's not the type of person I am" as if she had just eaten a lemon of lies and regret for her life as a whore.
>>37943826
Scary that someone can take a photo of you in a gym like that and post it online. There is no way to take that back.
>>37944126
need sum meat on those thighs of hers.
good riddance
females are 10x worse human beings than men if they feel like it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLDQVLuBbiw
>>37943826
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICa1x3OKZrc
She should of stook to her guns and said the women was fat and she had to show the world the horrors of obesity.
>>37944083
No shit, when you have millions of followers, posting someone naked without their consent is a much bigger deal then when only four followers see it.
>google Dani Mathers' twitter
>"doesn't exist"
>mfw
>>37944107
>You can see her lips writhe as she says "that's not the type of person I am" as if she had just eaten a lemon of lies
It fucking is lies. That's exactly the type of person she is since that's what she *did.* You know the type of person who doesn't post naked pics of fat people at the gym? THE TYPE THAT DOESN'T DO IT. Jesus fuck. She's the type of girl who says "we shouldn't" or "I'm not sure" when you take our your dick and you know that you'll be doing A2M later that night.
>>37944179
The best part is she saids shes not that type of person, but then states the photo was meant for a girlfriend of hers. SO YOU ARE THAT TYPE OF PERSON. Just not in public... Well not anymore.
>>37944155
This
>>37943826
The naked women will probably surface and become a huge advocate for anti-body shaming.
>>37943897
>accidentally posted
>not what I meant to do
>that's not what I'm about
>not the type of person I am
>people actually care about this irrelevant shit
i actually like her more even though i didn't know who she was. She seems to have made a lot of fat ugly moral superiors mad
>>37944106
hähähähähhähh :DDDDDDddDDDDD vodka postworkout drink for max gains :DDD:::PPPDDD
>>37944194
Exactly. It's like she knows she's being punished, but doesn't understand what she did was wrong. She doesn't apologize to the woman she violated, but to her fans. She doesn't apologize for being a peeping Molly who photographs naked people and shares them. She apologizes for body shaming. She doesn't say she didn't mean to take the picture or that it was wrong to do so. She says she only thought she was sharing the photo with a few people instead of millions. Only someone who doesn't understand why a behavior is wrong would try to justify it by saying it was meant to be private rather than public behavior.
>>37944660
is her taking a picture of a naked woman the end of the world?
>>37944789
it's illegal
she's a moron, that deserves to have all her contracts/fame/money pulled
>>37944789
It's illegal and immoral
Imagine if that was your mom anon
You spent years trying to convince your mom to start going to the gym because you care about her health and she finally does it and then some botox faced cunt takes pictures of her naked in the locker room and shares it with the world
It's a fucking cunt move
>>37943826
What kind of model works out at a LA fitness? Shouldn't she be at Equinox or something?
>>37943994
>now
>>37944919
my mum doesn't get butt naked in gyms
the fact is that the reason people care about this and want to see her lose her job is because they simply have nothing better to do with their time. its actually really fucking pathetic and im suprised you faggots support this. when did this place become some social justicy reddity tier?
>>37944963
I don't see why everyone is claiming this as body shaming. Could quite easily just be mad at random naked strangers. Not even an attempt at covering herself, just completely naked.
>>37944972
Then your mom is a nasty bitch and should probably shower after her workouts
And no shit people have nothing better to do, it's the internet, no one here has anything better to do. Doesn't change the fact that posting naked pictures of oblivious strangers is creepy and cunty and no one with an ounce of sympathy thinks it's okay
>>37944938
She doesn't work out. Her thighs are toothpicks. She wears weight gloves, despite obviously not moving much weight. In the sauna, she wears all her clothes, her gloves, a bracelet, headphones, and takes pictures of her face and naked people to post on Instagram.
She prances around the gym, taking a million photos of herself with gym things, to share with her followers.
Since all women do this, like taking food at restaurants etc... Why do they always think other women are genuinely doing what they are photographing? Surely one has to think, I only posed with that guitar for a picture, I can't actually play, does Brittany actually mountain bike?
>>37945007
She's naked in the one place at the gym you're supposed to expect people to be naked
Next you're going to get offended at the sauna too
>>37945007
She in the shower, why the fuck would she cover herself
>>37945009
you sound like a overly emotional drama-queen. would i be correct if i guessed you were a jealous female
im not even that smart but i can see the only reason people have a problem with it is because of her status in society
if it was an equally famous fat loser no one would have a second thought
>>37945007
its okay for people to be naked in the shower/gym/sauna/spa you insecure retard
>>37945021
>>37945024
>group showers
>not cubicles
Fucking America man, absolutely disgusting.
>>37943826
Is that eminems daughter?
>>37945033
>im not even that smart
No shit
>>37945033
lmao you're fucking brain dead
Anyone would get ripped to shreds for doing this
Lucky she's a woman cause if it was a man he would pretty much be in jail right now
Even if it was Amy Schumer or Lena Dunham or some other ugly fat bitch they would get rekt too
Anyone would
>>37945054
It's a cubicle
The woman probably just exited it cause it looks like she's picking up that thing hanging on the outside of it
>>37945073
oh woop di dooo who cares in the end it doesnt even matter the only people who care about this and get into are people who are too stupid to discuss actual topics like politics
whats her twitter so i can support her?
>>37943879
>it's not like that woman is recognizable
only to her friends, family and acquaintances.
>>37945093
Confirmed for brain dead 15 year old edgelord monkey
>>37943872
>>37943886
maybe they shouldn't have been naked in public retard
>>37945112
>HOW DARE YOU GET NAKED IN A LOCKER ROOM
>>37944054
ok?
It's 2016
If you are wandering around in a public gym naked, you should expect to be photographed
>>37945106
go back to lereddit
You can't even identify the person from the photo
Only liberals see anything wrong with this
I dnno why the woman is talking about body shaming or w/e, fucking dumb.
Theres no expectation of privacy in a group shower
>>37945112
>in public
>>37943826
Omg, dont be naked in public space if you don't want naked pictures taken retards. I know 100% if it was reversed like say an ugly fat butch shaming a hottie that was fully nude. Everyone would be like "I wouldn't care having naked pics if i looked like that" but, since its a hottie taking a pic of an uggo she is getting criminal charges? Seriously? Why are we such children? Tattle tails, timeouts, petty things made into big issues. We live in such a kindergarten world its pathetic.
>>37945168
>members of the public can come and go as they please
>not considered a public area
>>37945159
>Theres no expectation of privacy in a group shower
Yes there fucking is
Do you have autism?
>>37943921
Really? She's not even huge haes fatty, why so much hate
>>37945176
>privacy
>group shower
Jesus Christ there are way too many teenagers on /fit/
>>37945170
rampant liberalism at all levels of society & government
You think judges or politicians aren't petty liberal retards? Think again.
>>37945176
If you are in a "public" bathroom. You have taken the liability into your hands knowing you are in a PUBLIC space and will infact be nude. It is not illegal to take pictures in public space, they also do not need to blur your face if it is not being sold for profit. Technically its completely legal. Just like going to a nude beach and taking scenic pics and having naked people in the background. How retarded can people be?
>>37945170
It doesn't matter how attractive either of them are. LA Fitness needs to pursue criminal charges to preserve their reputation. If any random fuck can get away with taking creep shots of nude customers and posting them on the internet then LA Fitness loses a ton of customers who expect privacy in the locker room.
>>37943879
There are waayyyy uglier people even here in LA. The woman she's making fun off is probably still skinnier than the average American. Why go after this woman? She's doing nothing to her and really there's a lot worse on the eyes to behold. This model must not go outside much desu
>>37945215
>concerned about privacy
>getting naked in an open area with strangers
I go straight home and shower after the gym.
>>37945206
A locker room is not a public space retard. Only members of the same sex who are paying customers are allowed in. If you don't believe me, go hang out in the women's locker room of the nearest gym. You may not like it, but that's the law.
>>37945175
No they can't, gyms require membership fees you moron. Its a privately owned business, and its in a locker room ffs
We all know why she did it.
>pic extremely related
>>37945215
Its one thing if it was an LA fitness employee that took the picture. That is because they are not part of the public domain while in the job. It is also illegal for companies to put up cameras in bathrooms. So that would make sense. But this is not an employee. Its a public citizen taking a public picture that happend to have a naked person in it in a public area. These people are not required to uphold any law the company would be liable for. People should've understood this would be happening when we have more widely available camera phones.
>>37945231
A lot of women don't mind if other women see them naked for short periods of time, but still don't want thousands of men to see them naked. I don't understand why you don't get this.
>>37945241
>>37945239
They are open to the public, they are legally unable to discriminate against anyone who wants in & pays, anyone of their thousands of customers could be in there.
This is not a locked room
Why would you believe there is any expectation of privacy?
And if you have no expectation of privacy from people coming in & seeing you, how can you have an expectation to not be photographed?
>>37945242
this. just lmao@ how hard it backfired tho.
>>37943826
She's deleted her twitter and instagram.
>>37945239
Again, thats company policy to segregate bathrooms. It is not a "law" that says men and women can't shit together. How retarded are you? There are lots of places that have "COED" style locker rooms.
Just because you pay to use a public space doesn't mean its not public. Keep reaching for shit.
>>37945270
Why should the viewer's gender make any difference? If you're happy for one stranger to see you completely naked (except your ugly ass shoes) then what difference does it make if a billion people you'll never meet see a single picture from 20+ feet away?
She has herself exposed in an area that will regularly be filled with strangers. She has failed to properly assess the risks and has paid the price. Only herself to blame.
>>37945271
But if you are a man in the women's locker room the police will be called.
>>37943905
Honestly she deserves worse. She's shown many poor qualities including being first off too stupid to know how to use her phone/app. Shown that she's ungrateful, shown that she most likely finds 99% of the population laughable and disgusting/would make dun of most people given no provocation and just judges purely on exterior (shallow af). I mean there's more shit qualities related, but she basically revealed she's a bitch and a bad person. Even if you don't find that person attractive, the mindset it takes to get ur phone out, take a pic, type a caption, and post it is one of a complete bitch; like those actions had to go through layers of personal filters and this bitch still decides spewed word vomit. Frankly she comes off just as an ungrateful spoiled twat. Not like her tits or other surgical features were hard earned in the gym.
>>37945271
Public bathrooms have public in the very title, I guess according to you nobody should get in trouble for coming in and taking pictures of your dong while you piss? Moron.
>/fit/ justifying taking naked pictures of random people in the shower
You motherfuckers honestly have nothing better to do do you?
>>37943931
Damn, she looks pretty shitty herself without make up. Maybe that's why she's such a miserable bitch, she knows she's truly ugly and has to hide behind surgery and make up. She looks like thar Guy who played bane who got his face tucked as a boxer and had lots of surgery
>>37945175
Fucking kike
>>37945314
Have you never met any people? It might not make any sense from a logical standpoint, but that's the way it is. Legally LA Fitness can press charges and it is in their best interest to do so. If you don't agree with it go make your own society.
>>37945316
That's not 100% true, it depends on your intentions, or at least your perceived intentions. If you panic and say "oh shit i'm in the wrong locker room", no one is going to phone the police over that. But if you're in there hiding or trying to get in at people's belongings, then yeah, they're gonna do something about it.
>>37945324
>on 4chan
>complaining about how people spend their free time
>>37943826
As long as someone is trying to better themselves I say you're a huge fuck for judging them. I only hope that someday after all the surgery wears off and shes a wrinkled old bag she can't live with herself and fucking blows her head off.
>>37943937
Its not that she was naked was the problem, its that the prissy bitchy model felt bad about her eyes being offended to a natural body void of surgical enhancements. Hard to tell because bad quality, but the woman hardly looks fat
>>37945319
If im in a public bathroom playing helicopter with my dick in the mirror a public bathroom. Then wonder why did someone put a video up of me doing that? How retarded is that? If you are that insecure go home. If you dont want pictures if you, don't go in PUBLIC space. Its this simple. If you have no shame then why care if other see?
>>37945316
not in 2016
>>37945319
I piss in a booth, while sitting down
And I use my home gym
It's not the woman who was taken a picture of who is pressing charges, is it?
the funny thing is the woman in the picture probably doesnt even care about the pictures.
>>37945346
I don't even give a shit about her making fun of the person. It's just not okay to take pictures of naked people without their permission
>>37945369
Easy fix for that. Don't be naked in front of people you don't know.
>>37945357
>If im in a public bathroom playing helicopter with my dick in the mirror a public bathroom.
She's not doing that
She's just standing there getting dressed you moron
>>37945379
>shoes on already
>getting dressed
Clearly she's an exhibitionist
>>37945193
Yep.
>>37945375
The woman probably didn't even see her she's clearly at a distance hiding in a corner taking pictures like a creep
>>37944048
This. Her implants look like they're about yo burst from her chest and her face/lips look botched as fuck. She's pretty ugly in the oic w/o shitton of makeup on. She doesn't even look like her natural self and felt uncomfortable enough to get a bunch of botched surgery. She's in no place to be judging others. Side note I think Hugh Hefner is going blind, his playmates used to actually be hit back in like the 70s
>>37945385
>Taking your shoes off at a public shower
That's just gross, no one does that
>>37945385
?
You always wear shoes in public showers
And then you cover yourself with a towel, since you are in a public locker room.
>>37945390
It's still not a private room, literally anyone could walk in at any minute. She rolled the dice and she lost.
Taking photos of people you don't know naked is shady as fuck, but it's still retarded to get naked in a public space and then there be a backlash about it.
>>37943994
Why? What did the woman who was the victim in this situation do to deserve this? Or are you so blinded by biases that you completely forgot that there's another woman in this story who's the victim?
>>37945342
You must be retarded. If anything the lady that had the pictures taken can sue LA FITNESS. Its their responsibility if it so states in the waiver you signed. So what LA fitness is doing is trying ti make sure the blame doesn't get passed to them. Its just like a nude beach. If people are out taking pictures what? Is the ocean gonna press charges? Are you able ti sue the beach? No. So this is just so they seem like they are upholding thier policy. It is not a LAW to use separate bathrooms, or for public people to have and use thier personal cameras. There is a law saying the company itself cannot place a cc camera in the public restrooms. Thats about it.
>>37945412
>It's still not a private room, literally anyone could walk in at any minute. She rolled the dice and she lost
Anyone can walk in at any minute but it is still illegal and immoral for them to whip out their phone and take a picture
>>37945414
just on principle desu
>>37945428
Except no it is not, because there is no legal difference between your eyes & a camera provided you have a legal right to be somewhere
The most that can happen is LA fitness might sue her for breaching her joining agreement, if it so states that theres a "no cameras in the locker room" policy.
>>37945428
>morality
Kek.
How is a picture any different from a person walking in on you really?
>>37945379
>cant take an exaggeration as such.
Okay retard.
Lets say im a weirdo that pisses with my pants down at my ankles in a public urinal. Someone takes a pic of my ass while i do this. Id probably laugh and not do it again. Or I'd say fuck it and not give two shits and keep doing it cuz its me. Why do i care if people judge me if im willing to do such a thing in a public restroom?
>>37945454
there is nothing weird about being naked in a locker room you idiot
>>37945443
Because if the picture is on the internet then it's like millions of people walking in on you
And clearly you're abnormal and/or an edgelord so you don't give a fuck about morality but the rest of society does
>>37945465
>but the rest of society does
LOL
meanwhile they just legalized fucking gay marriage
and abortion has been legal for like 40 years
And the media takes the side of the criminal in every police shooting
Don't talk to me about society caring about morality
>>37945454
>Someone takes a pic of my ass while i do this.
Fine
If that person posts that picture to the internet then that person will be considered a creep, get insulted, and since this is a men's bathroom and the person who take a picture of some man's ass is also a man, he would be called a faggot
No one likes people who take pictures of people in spaces where they are not expecting to have pictures taken
Specially if their butt/titty/wang is out
>>37945464
You must be trolling.
>retardation levels are peaking
Seriously, do you understand how to read? Its pretty weird if someone got naked just to use the urinal. Or was fully clothed and and pulled their pants all the way down to piss. But thats not the point of the post. The point is IF a person takes a pic of me while im doing whatever it is in a public bathroom/locker room and im naked. I wouldn't care, due to me already assuming the responsibility of being in public. If i dont want people to see, id use a stall. Wait till i get home, etc.etc.
>>37943987
Good makeup
Good boltons
Professional camera crew
Sexy lingerie
Not fat (can be achieved with diet only)
There is literally nothing to indicate this girl is doing anything sensible or helpful in the gym.
>>37945494
You know absolutely none of what you mentioned has to do with respect and privacy right
But it does make it clear that you're just an edgelord who's mad at the world
It's ok kid
You grow out of it
>>37943865
Those are some very fake tits.
>>37945495
Yes, but my issue, Is why would that guy be charged with any kind of crime? Its my own fault. Unless he makes some cash off it, i couldn't care less where the pic gets sent.
>>37945033
You seem like the kind of Guy that wilk go to jail for rape
>>37943852
lol "i need some time to reflect". there's no deeper meaning to this, goddamn dumb cunt. she did it because she's still a kid. ffs
>>37945527
Because taking naked pictures of people inside public bathrooms or public changong rooms without their knowledge is a crime buddy
>>37945540
cite the law that says that
>>37945016
>since all women do this
>that all inclusive language that screams I don't think before I speak and is devoid of rationale
obviously not all women do this, given that the victim was also a woman.
>only paying attention to the woman with big fake tits and lots of makes up
This is what gets you guys in trouble
>>37945073
I certainly hope he'd be in jail if he's a Guy lurking in the female locker room/sauna sneaking pictures of strange women
>>37945540
Show me where its illegal to,
take public pictures, to take pictures of people in public, to have a personal camera in public bathrooms. Show me the law that clearly states a public entity cannot use a personal camera in a public space. I know you can't have a Cc camera in a public bathroom. But thats cuz we dont want the government or company taking our pictures. Which is why we can make laws to prevent that. But public entities are entirely different.
>>37945093
/pol/ go back to your contamination board. No one wants your stupid clouding up self improvement
>>37945120
La fitness is not public. It requirements a membership fee like any other PRIVATE facilities.
>people think a gym locker room is public
How do you fit so much stupid into something so stoic
>>37945558
I am seriously not about to go looking for it so trust me on this
>>37945159
>liberals
Confirmed retard who's searching for confirmation bias. Keep /pol/ contamination on the board where it belongs.
>>37943826
She's hot as fuck. Literally no one who would ever matter in her life is going to care.
>People trying to argue that taking photos of others in bathooms isn't illegal
I hope one of you retards tries it to prove a point and ends up in jail
>"but Judge, washrooms are technically public spaces, so I'm allowed to film people showering and using the toilet"
People literally get arrested for using cameras in washrooms all the time.
http://law.justia.com/codes/virginia/2006/toc1802000/18.2-386.1.html
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly and intentionallyvideotape, photograph, or film any nonconsenting person or create anyvideographic or still image record by any means whatsoever of thenonconsenting person if (i) that person is totally nude, clad inundergarments, or in a state of undress so as to expose the genitals, pubicarea, buttocks or female breast in a restroom, dressing room, locker room,hotel room, motel room, tanning bed, tanning booth, bedroom or otherlocation; or (ii) the videotape, photograph, film or videographic or stillimage record is created by placing the lens or image-gathering component ofthe recording device in a position directly beneath or between a person'slegs for the purpose of capturing an image of the person's intimate parts orundergarments covering those intimate parts when the intimate parts orundergarments would not otherwise be visible to the general public; and whenthe circumstances set forth in clause (i) or (ii) are otherwise such that theperson being videotaped, photographed, filmed or otherwise recorded wouldhave a reasonable expectation of privacy.
This is just for Virginia, but every other state and developed country has similar laws.
>>37945604
If a person can provide a fee and enter, then the place by definition is PUBLIC
If anyone can join its membership, then again, its PUBLIC
These sorts of questions were settled 50 years ago during the civil rights era.
This is a business open to the public, the locker room which anyone might enter is also public
>>37945604
Its public if the doors are open for the public. You must be a moron if you think jus cuz you pay money to go to a public space makes it no longer public. You pay to allow the owner of the "public" land to keep the land maintained so you can continue ro use the land. Its exactly how your taxes keep the nude beaches clean and under control. The difference is money is paid to a company or money is paid to the government. So it really doesn't matter. Land is land, public is publc regardless if you pay or not.
>>37943826
Body shaming is right.
>>37945634
>A. It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly and intentionallyvideotape, photograph, or film any nonconsenting person or create anyvideographic or still image record by any means whatsoever of thenonconsenting person if (i) that person is totally nude, clad inundergarments, or in a state of undress so as to expose the genitals, pubicarea, buttocks or female breast in a restroom, dressing room, locker room,hotel room, motel room, tanning bed, tanning booth, bedroom or otherlocation;
>>37945581
>>37945558
Fucking retards.
>>37945581
Just fyi laws can be at any level of government. I'm guessing you're trying to lead the conversation into discussing the absence of personal privacy laws on the federal level, but I'm guessing you are unaware that they can very well exist on the city/county/state level
>>37945633
Maybe don't walk around naked in the fucking lobby area?
Like fuck, they have curtains for a reason.
Seriously who the fuck cares.
>women can wear what the want or not wear, it's their choice!
>unless you find us repulsive, then it's totally not okay to look at us!
Seriously, fuck off. Body shaming should be fucking encouraged.
>>37945558
>>37945581
This is the most I'm willing to do
Besides I don't know LA fitness but my gym has a thing on its contract that forbids taking pictures in there
>>37945654
It's still illegal, that's the entire fucking point.
It's in a locker room, and the photo was taken without the knowledge of the woman
Are you retarded? Is your brain capacity that of a young child?
>>37945627
Except her followers and her potential employers
Media personalities have to be nice
>>37943937
>used to train at usarmy gym in germany
>never see nekid ppl in da locker
hush hush change nad hide
>exept thursdays
>thursdays german cops get to use the army gym
BRATWURST BRATWURST BRATWURST
>>37945271
They're open to the public just like any other business is open to the public. This doesn't make it public space. Gyms are a private business where corporations own the building etc. This isn't a public park that's actually been designated as belonging to the government or government agencies, this is a privately owned business. As such they have the right to refuse service to anyone as long as its not blatant racism etc. And the gym and the space it takes up privately owned/rented by the corporation.
>so many kids don't know the difference BTW public and private space
>>37945646
Thats virginia
Thats not california
And really, its probably not constitutional
>>37945633
>otherwise such that theperson being videotaped, photographed, filmed or otherwise recorded wouldhave a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Yep, if you are hiding your body in a stall or under a towel or in underware and they are upskirting and peeping in you is onething. But if you are openly walking about naked with no concerns of other people in the room, that shows there was no "reasonable" expectation of privacy.
>>37945654
You really are retarded
I don't know if I should continue insulting you or not, don't want to feel like the type of person who picks on the retarded kid
>>37945535
You seem like the type of guy to have a black step son called jamal
>>37945672
>Except her followers and her potential employers
She's a fucking playboy model. Her followers are literally dudes jacking off to her and the whole grand total of 10 SJWs that follow her for whatever bullshit feminist reasons their retard brains can muster up.
ITT: RETARDS ACTUALLY DEFENDING SOME RANDOM WHORE TAKING ILLEGAL PICS OF A PERSON IN THE BATHROOM
when did /pol/ become white knights?
>All these reddit tier SJW's in this thread
>>37945314
Because if the sex of the person viewing you is opposite, they're more likely to be hetero and attracted to you. Which also means their intentions go from whatever to "sexy time pervert". I can't believe you need this simple.obvious concept explained to you
>>37945709
They don't even care about what they're defending anymore, just gotta be contrarian, gotta keen the edge, otherwise it's leddit
>>37945016
RIP
she has a big mouth
>>37945694
>>37945695
>arguing semantics
>wanting me to go searching for laws in multiple states that all say the exact thing, and are common-sense in the first place
If you are legitimately this retarded, I feel sorry for your parents.
Feel free to go to the nearest locker room and start snapping photos, I'm sure with your knowledge of legal loopholes you'll be fine.
>>37945505
If you're in a locker room there is an expectation that people will get naked to change clothes or shower, just as there is an expectation for somebody to whip out their dick to take a piss in a restroom. These things arent abnormal. What you're describing is abnormal. To make the comparison fair, it would be like you going up to a urinal and peeing like normal, and some guy stands up over the divider to take a pic of your dick. For fucks sake, these facilities exist for a reason, otherwise people would be allowed to use the bathroom out in public or get naked wherever they are with no repercussions. There should be some general understanding that while you're still technically "in public" you should maintain a level of courtesy and respect. Fuck, I don't even know why I'm having to explain this to you
>>37945663
Yeah, because laws like these don't get beaten by simply fighting it. Because it infringes on my rights as a public entity, and if i take a decent lawyer i can almost always get off from it. Just getting a DUI Or driving without a license which you can actually do. Yes its "illegal" but its not "unlawful". Theres a big difference between the two. Just people are to afraid to fight, and rollover and accept these retarded regulations that help nothing.
>>37945699
I'm a white girl and I don't do kids, try again?
ITT
autists defend this girl taking unethical pictures that are legit illegal in some jurisdictions because low key they have taken voyeuristic pictures and want to feel like there nothing wrong with what theyve done.
restrooms and lockers in a private club implies that this is not an area for the open public. Additionally, there ARE plenty of laws at a variety of levels from city to federal that prohibit this kind of voyeurism. A quick google will elucidate you on society's common ground.
if you need this explained any further to you, you have serious issues. Please dont buy a gun, work with children, or operate heavy machinery in the future.
>>37945644
>>37945634
By your logic a bum can just walk into a gym and shower whenever he pleases... gyms are not publicly owned, they're private you morons
>>37945760
It's probably just trolls desu
In two years /fit/ went from having decent discussion to edgy retards saying whatever because of /b/ mentality
>>37945654
That didn't make sense dude. You're too butthurt to type
>>37945748
>Just people are to afraid to fight, and rollover and accept these retarded regulations that help nothing.
more like no self respecting lawyer is going to go against the grain and accept a perv like you as a client. No judge will rule in favor of voyeuristic pictures in a private establishment distributed through the internet.you have no *rights* under any constitutional law as a "public entity" to take pictures of people in a private environment.
AND YES A GYM QUALIFIES AS A PRIVATELY OWNED BUSINESS AND DOING SO IN A LA FITNESS BREAKS THE TERMS OF CONTRACTS WHICH OPENS YOU UP TO CIVIL LITIGATION ON MULTIPLE FRONTS AND DEFENDENTS
>>37945778
a bum who pays the membership fee can do so...
There is no expectation of privacy there, this is not a "creep shot", this is standing in a public locker room where ANYONE can see you.
>mfw beach body ready
>mfw 7.75x5.25in dick
>mfw face is good enough looking
Take pictures of me naked in the locker room and post them on the Internet see if I give a fuck, I look good
Anyone crying muh rights probably looks like a pile of dog shit or is insecure as fuck
>>37945112
That's the showers in the women's locker room, which has an adjacent sauna, from which she is photographing the woman through the window of said sauna.
>>37945760
>if you need this explained any further to you, you have serious issues. Please dont buy a gun, work with children, or operate heavy machinery in the future.
/thread
>>37945760
>low key
Dropped
Back to tumblr you fucking faggot
>>37945819
still can't believe you're not 15
>>37945558
>810.145
>A person commits the offense of video voyeurism if that person:
(a)For his or her own amusement, entertainment, sexual arousal, gratification, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing another person, intentionally uses or installs an imaging device to secretly view, broadcast, or record a person, without that person’s knowledge and consent, who is dressing, undressing, or privately exposing the body, at a place and time when that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy;
>>37945789
If the law says it can be done, it can be done. You can and will find a lawyer. And if the judge tosses the case, you can keeo trying or just sue the judge for an unfiar trual and they will be held in contempt. Remeber laws are laws. the Supreme laws rules all. Public domain is public domain. Maybe learn a bit more about system and maybe find the difference between lawful and legal.
>>37945271
You're either an idiot or a troll. Probably one of those old fucks that got caught taking pictures of little girls and now you spend your time trying to justify your actions.
>>37945795
If he has to pay a membership fee to get in, then its not open to the public, its open to MEMBERS of the gym.
>>37943826
The woman doesn't even look particularly fat, just like a normal middle-aged person.
What was she trying to do even?
>>37945760
>legit illegal in some jurisdictions because low key they have taken voyeuristic pictures and want to feel like there nothing wrong with what theyve done.
If this is a privacy issue, it can be argued that the lady in the picture had a diminished expectation of privacy because she was in a public place where every one is expected to be naked.
If you're going with defamation, we can hardly identify the woman in the picture and it could have been any body. I'm not the best lawfag and I'm genuinely curious how to rekt the gril who took the picture.
>>37945788
>>37945664
>>37945696
>whiteknights
Disgusting. The lobby area isn't fucking meant to walk around naked in. That's completely unhygenic, and the fact that there is a fucking glass door there, is CLEAR indication that you should be fucking naked.
In fact, you could very much make the argument that she was breaking the law with indecent exposure.
>>37945836
I think it's just a retarded teenager who thinks making fun of people all the time even if they're just minding their business is fun
>>37945847
Show us how much of a deluded bitch she is. I don't understand how this "model" goes out in public if she finds this offensive. I find way more aesthetically offensive stuff on a daily basis outside. Idk how she goes outside or functions
>>37945709
This is /fit/ m8, and no one is defending her.
>>37945829
No court of appeal will ever review a case of someone snapping photos in a locker room.
>>37945828
Yes a creep shot. This picture is not any of those things listed. It was a public picture and a person standing in it happened to be nude. Its like me going and taking a picture in a park and a person happend to be taking a shit or changing clothes in the far background. Is it my problem they were shitting/changing in a public space?
>>37945829
>If the law says it can be done, it can be done. You can and will find a lawyer. And if the judge tosses the case, you can keeo trying or just sue the judge for an unfiar trual and they will be held in contempt. Remeber laws are laws. the Supreme laws rules all. Public domain is public domain. Maybe learn a bit more about system and maybe find the difference between lawful and legal.
yeah and spend thousands of dollars appealing the verdict over and over as you get pegged for video voyeurism.
you're already breaking the law:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1801
you're a retarded contrarian that cant see whats right in front of you. why are you arguing semantics? to feel smart? to white knight?
fucking pathetic.
For the retards ITT that think you don't have a resonable expectation of privacy in a locker room
>(c)“Place and time when a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means a place and time when a reasonable person would believe that he or she could fully disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that the person’s undressing was being viewed, recorded, or broadcasted by another, including, but not limited to, the interior of a residential dwelling, bathroom, changing room, fitting room, dressing room, or tanning booth.
>>37945760
>restrooms and lockers in a private club implies that this is not an area for the open public.
Yes but the one who took the pic was not a member of the public was it?
>>37945860
The glass door leads to the sauna, which is also another area where you are supposed/expected to be naked
The model chick is gross for being in there clothed
The door that goes to the actual gym area obviously has no glass in it
>2 year old back picture of me
>half naked dude in the background
Fuck please don't report me to the cops guys
>>37945860
Are you blind or retarded. That isn't the lobby area, that is the SHOWERS OF THE WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM. The showers have an adjacent sauna, which has a glass door. A sauna that she is sitting in to photograph a naked old woman in preparing to enter a shower stall in the WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM.
Its like you're really retarded.
>>37945877
There's still the issue of whether the woman in the picture had a "reasonable expectation of privacy"
>>37945849
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1801
restrooms and locker rooms have a resonable expectations of privacy AND it is against the ters of contract with LA fitness.
what she's done is illegal regardless of whether you can identify her or not.
tl;dr
even if you incinerate someones body and cant identify the victim, you can still be pegged with murder if yo urecord what yo udid.
lmfao how fucking dumb are womyn
jesus christ we should really go through with that dere plan of stocking womyn in farms like cows so we can fuck them when we want and just clean the planet of these imperfect beings
>>37945872
How is it not? She took a picture for her own amusement of an oblivious lady in a gym locker room (where people a reasonable expectancy of privacy)
>>37945893
But everybody is naked in gym locker rooms. You can walk around naked and just happen to be in the shot when some retard took a selfie. There is at least a diminished expectation of privacy.
>>37945860
>womens locker room
>indecent exposure
holy shit, summer's at high noon right now, FUCK
>>37945897
>>37945900
>being naked in the sauna
>what are robes?
Seriously, what ghetto ass hick town are you guys from? You would legit get kicked out of my facility if you did that. Robes and slippers are absolutely mandatory.
No body wants to see your bits flying everywhere.
>>37945877
>(5) the term “under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means—
(A) circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that an image of a private area of the individual was being captured; or
(B) circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that a private area of the individual would not be visible to the public, regardless of whether that person is in a public or private place.
>a reasonable person would believe that a private area of the individual would not be visible to the public
Please tell me more how she assumed she wouldn't be seen by the "public"?
>>37945898
His dick isn't out and men's chests aren't considered a private part so it's fine
>>37945898
1. DYEL?
2. You can't see his dick or balls so it's not video voyeriusm. If he was naked you would have committed a third degree felony.
If she was inside a shower or a bathroom stall this would be different
But shes out in a public area that everyone walks through/past and can see her
There is no expectation of privacy there
She could EASILY have brought a towel and not exposed herself.
>>37945904
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1801
read the link, this covers that as well.
not only are you stupid but youre illiterate
>>37945918
If we assuming LA fitness is like your facility, the lady is clearly wearing slippers already and that thing she's reaching for looks like a robe
So she's doing literally nothing wrong, she's getting ready to enter the sauna
>>37945918
Dear god it's like I'm actually arguing with a mentally challenged person. The old woman isn't in the sauna, the model is. Secondly, you should at most be in the sauna with a towel on. Wearing fucking clothes in the sauna is disgusting, you fat American mess.
>>37945905
>restrooms and locker rooms have a resonable expectations of privacy AND it is against the ters of contract with LA fitness.
Against people not occupying the same facility. The one who took the picture had access to the same facility and had the same right to be there. I'm saying she has an out.
>>37945558
Are you kidding me?!
>>37945936
>women's change rooms are public areas
you're an idiot
>>37945918
we're from civilization where one guy can see another dude naked and doesnt have a rush of homophobic feelings
from the greeks to the romans to many europeans, many cultures dont get quesy with nudity.
if you get queasy or upset at the sight of the opposite sex youre probably a closet homo.
if yo uget quesy with the opposite sex, youre pathetic.
>>37945925
This. I see vagoo all the time in locker rooms. It's okay to be naked in locker rooms.
>>37945940
What did you not read this part>>37945925
>>37945912
That is still illegal. The law clearly states there is an expectation of privacy in bathrooms, changing areas, etc.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0800-0899/0810/Sections/0810.145.html
>>37945912
Retards aren't supposed to take selfies in locker rooms
If they do it and there's someone naked in the background then they're wrong and against da law
It falls under stipulation A
think about it fucker.
use your head.
like i said, please dont work with children, heavy machinery, or guns in the future.
>>37945929
>>DYEL
did you miss the part where I said it was 2 years old
>>37945927
True but maybe he didn't want his chest to be exposed on 4chan for many friendos to see
>>37945940
Anon, you have to apply the law to the facts of the case. A good argument can be made that there is a diminished expectation of privacy as had been posted multiple times ITT.
>>37945925
Because LA fitness has a clause saying photography is prohibited in the locker room. She was expecting all cameras to be off in the locker room.
>>37945951
They have hooks in the showers where you are meant to put your robe, and a shelf for your slippers.
You are meant to disrobe and rerobe in the stall.
>>37945955
>thinks people wear gym gear and glives in sauna
>thinks they keep rubber tube matts in sauna
Yep. Country hick confirmed. Please quit spreading your filthy redneck ignorance here you culture-less pig.
>>37945985
Who are you to tell a public entity what they can and can't do in a public space? Especially photography? Its been settled in supreme Court of law that its perfectly legal to photograph in public space.
>>37945971
>I am just like my Roman forefathers; my ancestors smile at me, can you say the same?
Keep that shit at the Ren Fair dude.
>>37945983
What you are failing to grasp is that there is the issue as to whether that applies to another person who has the same right to be in the same place.
ANYONE HERE THAT IS A FUCKIN WEIRDO DEFENDING THE MODEL, DO NOT BUY A GUN, WORK WITH CHILDREN, OR OPERATE HEAVY MACHINERY.
Thanks, have a good one.
>>37945996
There is no diminished expectation of privacy. You retarda keep saying that she's in a public place, despite it being a locker room.
>>37945997
Then this is a breach of contract case, not a criminal case, and standing is with LA Fitness, not the woman in the picture, retard.
>>37946014
Except when it's in a place where there are nude people out and about who are expecting privacy from cameras or a place in a private business where you are explicitly told not to take pictures, which is the case here
So fuck your selfie
>>37945997
Show me this "clause". It probably states that LA fitness is not liable for any inconvenience or damages done. Never once have i been to a lockerroom and signed a thing that said i cant use my phone. How silly.
>>37945996
No there's no argument for a diminished expectation of privacy in a locker room. It's is specifically written into the state statues.
(c)“Place and time when a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means a place and time when a reasonable person would believe that he or she could fully disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that the person’s undressing was being viewed, recorded, or broadcasted by another, including, but not limited to, the interior of a residential dwelling, bathroom, changing room, fitting room, dressing room, or tanning booth.
There's hundreds of voyeur cases when some neckbeard tries to use your argument and it has never worked. But why don't you try it out and see what happens.
>>37946022
No. What I'm saying is that, notwithstanding the LA Fitness clause I just found out about, a rightful occupant of a common area of a gym locker room has a diminished expectation of privacy as to another who has the same rightful presence in the said area.
>>37946012
You can literally see the metal encasement they keep the sauna rocks in on the far left. Then beside it is a bench, and walls, both made of cedar.
The rubber floor matts are so people don't slip and sue LA Fitness.
You're right, no one should be wearing gym gear in the sauna, but that Playboy playmate has proved herself almost as braindead as you are, you fucking mong.
