How do I get toned? I don't want to be too big.
HIGH REPS LOW WEIGHT
I
G
H
R
E
P
S
L
O
W
W
E
I
G
H
T
>>37909619
read the sticky
Hip abductions x200 at 10lbs
Treadmill 20 mins
Jumping jacks x200
Bodyweight squats x200 for DAT ASS
Eat only fruit
This will make you toned and cute without big nasty bubble muscles XD
>Been lifting with light weights so I just get """toned""" and not "too big"
>Several months, decent progress
>My mom says I looks super toned
>One day, walk into gym
>figure I'll try using heavier weight for once, what harm can it do right?
>pick up a 30 lb dumbbell
>With all my might, manage to curl it for one rep
>feel a strange sensation all over my body
>drop the weight, my entire body is expanding
>clothes tear apart
>extremepain.jpg
>1 minute later, I'm in a pool of my own sweat, tears, and vomit on the gym floor
>pic related, my body has turned into this
That's exactly how it happens. Don't end up like me, OP. Make sure you don't get too big :)
>>37909697
İ fucking died thx brah.
>>37909619
do one legged bosu ball squats with a kettlebell
>that math logic
>in english
>american """"" education"""""
>>37909619
What backwards maths are they teaching in America that gives 16 as the answer?
>>37910413
16 is the only answer, dummy
>20/5(2*2)
>20/5*4
>4*4
>16
Not sure what the fuck are they referring as the old way
>>37910467
I think they don't know how to read equations.
They read it like this:
20
---------
5(2*2)
>>37909673
You look good, where you're from? I am from London. [email protected] mail me ;-)
>>37910467
Order of operation puts multiplication before division, dumbfuck
>>37910660
L O N D O N
O
N
D
O
N
>toned
triggered
>>37909619
why would they show that to 5yos? to teach that math is le relative just like sociology therefore just as valid?
>>37910664
it actually puts them at the same time
what governs is left to right, which makes no sense really
>>37910467
>20/(5(2*2))
>20/(5*4)
>20/20
>1
American Math is hard for everyone.
>>37910664
>burger education at work
Multiplications and divisions are both ranked the same in the order of operations and such are done in the order from left to right.
Heres the first 3 results from google
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations
https://www.mathsisfun.com/operation-order-pemdas.html
http://www.mathgoodies.com/Lessons/vol7/order_operations.html
I assume you mean lean ? Get down to 10 or 12 % body fat.
I'm currently in uni studying to be a teacher and this shit triggers me. Glad we don't teach this meme in Aus
>>37910467
20 ÷ (5 × (2 × 2)
(20 ÷ 5) × (2 × 2)
prefix notation:
÷ 20 (× 5 (× 2 2)
× (÷ 20 5) (× 2 2)
>>37910467
>>37910541
Order of priorities
>20 / 5 (2x2)
>(2x2) = (4)
>20 / 5 (4)
>5(4) = 20
>20 / 20 = 1
>>37910757
>not studying applied math, learning COBOL and getting rich
>>37910664
Except it doesn't. Division and multiplication are put before addition and subtraction, but not before one another.
>>37910768
Wouldn't enjoy it. Pursuing teaching as a passion that pays comfortably. I am happy with that.
>>37910762
Put it to wolfram alpha, or any functional calculator, and you get 16
20/5(4) = 20/5*4 and using the proper order of operations, you divide first and then multiply, as shown in this very thread
>shopped image triggers autists
>more at 11
>>37910769
He's right, division and multiplication are equal on the order of operation, though he's deliberately acting stupid about this equation to incite nerd rage.
>>37910795
>I literally don't know how simplifying works
In the order of operations brackets are gone through first.
You're trying to cram 2 separate calculations into one. If you need someone to explain to you why ((5(2x2)/20) is the correct order of operations then you should kill yourself.
>>37910868
> ((5(2x2)/20)
why did you flip the eq to make the right answer 1
>>37909619
I'm not sure if you are all just trolling or some of you are serious.
The equation is ambiguous. There is no set rule for this. It could mean either.
>>37911023
If division and multiplication are in the same priority, why does it matter if I flip the equation ;^)
(20 / (5(2x2))
Looks messy, doesn't it?
>>37911084
>It could mean either.
nice meme anon
>>37911102
but in this one you added cute sexy spaces
>>37911157
Only because it can't be written as a x and / together.
It's an incomplete equation if you have them together. Online calculators try to adjust for human stupidity by rewriting the equation to make sense, but it's meaningless.
>>37911244
I actually can't tell if what you said is super autistic or if I'm too stupid to understand it. Why would it ever be written with a x and / together, you can't have 2 operations together. its a complete expression not equation. there is only one answer.
>The equation is ambiguous.
>>37910802
BODMAS, Holyshit americans can't actually be this stupid.
>>37911556
It's not ambiguous at all, thats just what retards have started saying about grade school mathematics they don't understand. People don't have to put brackets around things to recognise equations. Computers do.
20/5(2x2)
is
20 / (5(2x2))
We see and understand that there are 2 equations, and that you are supposed to divide the end equation by 20, therefore, to write it in a way that a computer can understand - and people that don't understand grade school maths - you rewrite it in a way that makes mathematical sense.
What a bracket effectively means is multiplication, but it's on a higher priority of operations.
5(2) is 5x2
5(2x2) is 5x2 + 5x2
20 / ((5x2)+(5x2))
People who do maths at school learn that you don't need to expand simple equations to get the correct answer. 5(2x2) is the same as 5(4).
20/5(4)
5(4) is a part of the equation related to a bracket, and thus gets done first.
>>37911885
>not using PEMDAS
lol ok savage
>order of operations derails another thread
this will never get old
>>37911885
>>37911965
>FUCKING RETARDS NOT USING BIMDAS
>>37911989
>Implying OP didn't deliberately make a funposting thread by slinging together memeword catchphrases that are universally mocked by all of /fit/.
20 / 5 (2 * 2)
Do the parenthesis first
Then the multiplication - 5(4)
Then the division 20 / 5
The answer is one. What other way can you correctly do this equation?
>>37912050
*then the division 20/20
>>37912050
A U T I S T I C
>>37910660
PLS BE IN LONDON
>>37912050
>What other way can you correctly do this equation?
None.
>What other way can you do this equation?
Whatever nonsense barely literate cavemen slip on next.
>>37912084
GUYS, EVERY TIME I READ AN ACROSTIC POEM I CAN'T FIGURE OUT THE FINAL MESSAGE!
It's just a foreign concept to me, I keep reading left to right, as is tradition with almost all English words, but I lack the critical thinking skills required to understand the poem!
Achieve excellence!
Inspire others!
Dedicate yourself to the betterment of mankind!
Stay true to yourself!
>>37909697
That pic reminds me of searching for buff guys on Google images to jerk it to back when I was twelve. It'd always pop up when searching "huge muscles" or something similar.
Man, those were the days.
>>37912353
LONDON
>>37910413
Computers agree.
Pop open powershell and enter this:
20/5*(2*2)
>>37909697
loudest of keks
>>37912417
Computer doesn't understand human stupidity.
>>37911931
The question is written poorly. Unless they specifically write it with a bracket roping the 20 and 5 together, the 5 is a part of the (2x2) equation.
>>37912417
No.
The initial question is flawed, as it doesn't specify which one of these is what it is asking. Which is why you stop writing math expressions like this past grade school.
>>37912641
This.
That style of 'equations' is basically slang. Something that makes sense, but only if you aren't taking it at face value and understand the intention.
>>37910664
No they are same. You just didn't pay close enough attention to PEDMAS in school. The way they teach it is fine.
>>37912641
>>37912837
This is why they should teach people that math is a language, just like english. Its phonetic. You need to look at the equation as a "word" problem.
>>37913075
>math is a language
t. Engineer.
>>37911931
I was mocking the dude who said it was ambiguous it isn't.
I actually can't understand how someone could be taught/understand math so poorly.
>Using distribution when the terms in the bracket are being multiplied
6(3*3)=6*9=54
6*3+6*3=36
It only worked in that example because 2+2=2*2
>Thinking "brackets" means anything in and around a bracket is done first instead of just inside the bracket
>Thinking we don't use brackets to signify order because humans "recognize equations" but just so computers can understand it.
man this post was a high quality meme, please avoid being in a position where anybody has to rely on you to do anything but manual labor we usually reserve for animals.
>>37912641
man what the fuck is wrong with american education. the initial question did specify what form it was
the top one in ur pic is: 20/5*(2*2)
the bottom one is: 20/(5*(2*2))
stop talking about stuff you dont understand
>>37913075
math is a language, just like english.
plz stop
>It's a /fit/ gets trolled by Common Core thread
Every time.
>>37913075
>math is a language, just like english
lel
what notation and numerals you use might be accidental but math itself isn't that.
>>37910664
Multiplications are divisions
>>37912641
>the initial question is flawed
So much this.
This just further proves the stereotype that gym rats are just retarded meat heads with no actual intelligence
>>37910726
>Common core
>Not getting the joke
Man you guys really are desperate to attack anything huh
Wait wait wait wait
Do you cucks think '(' and ')' are called brackets?
Those are fucking parentheses. With a 'p' as in 'pemdas'
'[ ]' these are fucking brackets
>>37913880
Is the other way around, 'division' is just multiplication of the inverse.
>>37913901
>he thinks he's smart
Lmao
>>37913831
>>37913713
>>37913587
So please tell us, what is maths if not a formal system ?
>>37914026
{} these are brackets
>>37909697
kek
>>37914425
>language = formal system
>conflating models of theories in mathematics with mathematics itself
>being this retarded
Sasuga /fit/.
>>37914466
...nigga! Those are curly braces
>>37914425
>>37913075
I personally believe math is like a language in that the more you use it the more "fluent" you become in it. But people are too stupid to see the comparison for what it is, /fit/ especially given they dont know basic algebra beyond adding up their big 3 totals.
>>37914466
Those are braces.
>>37914522
>trying to pretend to be smart
>uses anime reaction pics
>>37914578
I personally believe math is like riding a bike in that the more you use it the more "fluent" you become in it.
I personally believe math is like free running in that the more you use it the more "fluent" you become in it.
I personally believe math is like [literally anything] in that the more you use it the more "fluent" you become in it.
>>37914595
>no arguments
Lmao
>>37914606
Math is literally the language of the universe fromeverything to black holes to rain droplets. Your condescension and pretention tells me youre fun at parties tho.
>>37914647
>Math is literally the language of the universe
It being able to describe the universe doesn't mean it's a language lmfao.
>>37909697
Just fucked up my sides senpai
>>37914660
Images on your pc, iphone, cuck porn, and vast anime reactions folder is made up of 1 ands 0's. Just because you are too dumb to understand that doesnt means its not true
Heres an appropriate thread for people who think like you though
>>37912788
>>37914706
>digital representation of data means math is a language
>still doesn't understand what a language is
Lmao this bait is almost too obvious. So embarrassing.
>>37914725
>no argument
Heh
>>37914732
>still this retarded
>still not googling what the formal definition of a language is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_language
>>37910467
>>37910541
5(2*2) is one term, you dips
>>37914744
>wikipedia
>>37914522
Yeah I was CONFLATING math with zfc.
So what is it for you, the set of all theories ever used ? And why do you say models of theories instead of just theories ?
>>37914779
>the set of all theories ever used
Doesn't exist. No matter how many levels of metamathematics you go you will always be able to make new models and new theories.
>And why do you say models of theories instead of just theories ?
I'm making a distinction between, for instance, models of set theory and set theory itself.
>>37910722
> getting trolled by literally 10 year old memes
>the sum of the squares of the cathetus equals the square of the hypotenuse
what language is this? math or english?
>>37914801
There is an infinite number of theories ofc but only a finite number have been used as of now, actually used by people I mean.
>distinction
What is this distinction ?
By models you mean axioms together with inference rules right ?
>>37914871
>finite number have been used as of now
How do you reconcile what you're saying with the fact that there are many who have used mathematical techniques to study (all) theories of arithmetic, like Godel and Tarski?
>By models you mean axioms together with inference rules right ?
Yes, i.e. a formal system. "Theory" refers to "theory of sets" or "theory of groups", etc.
>>37914660
>It being able to describe the universe doesn't mean it's a language
>languages literally used to describe and communicate ideas
either a literal retard or gr8 b8
>>37912353
Holy shit dude are you me?
Does the term MG forum ring a bell for you?
>>37910664
get out of here, engi here, it's 16
>>37914981
>engi here
>its the right answer because the machines that do my job for me tell me so
>>37914906
>reconcile
They USED one theory (I don't know which one tbf) to make a statement ABOUT an infinite class of theories. But let's forget about me trying to guess what you think and give your def of maths
>"Theory" refers to "theory of sets" or "theory of groups"
Try to give a definition
>>37914990
I have done all my exams as if they were "16" and i haven't reprobed yet
>>37914946
I know exactly what you are talking about and I'm not that person that posted earlier but I also did the exact same thing as both of you
>>37914998
>reconcile
Well you're right, I think we could say they used an infinite number of theories. Let's forget about this and give defs.
>>37909619
10/10 OP
MASTER TROLL
U
S
T
R
O
L
L
@37915140
... I dont quite understand and i dont think i want to. The @ is so my reply isnt misconstrued as a roll
>>37909619
You can eat 4000 calories or more a day, do fucking gear and hit the gym like Arnie on speed and still look "toned".
It's just knowing when you're at a size you like.
"Toned" is such a stupid bullshit word. What exactly do you mean by "toned"? Show us a picture.
>>37912050
subtly trolled
>>37914919
>math only have one utility
>that utility determines what math is
Lmao this retardation is 9gag tier.
>>37914998
Statements in metamathematics must be proven using properties of the theories under discussion.
>>37912050
I'm pretty sure you go left to right and the answer is 16.
RIP my sides at this thread
holy fucking shit
Mathematics is pure language - the language of science. It is unique among languages in its ability to provide precise expression for every thought or concept that can be formulated in its terms. (In a spoken language, there exist words, like "happiness", that defy definition.)
>citation
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/language/MathIsLanguage.shtml
>>37917661
https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/LockhartsLament.pdf
>Simplicio: But isn’t math different? Isn’t math a language of its own, with all
sorts of symbols that have to be learned before you can use it?
>SALVIATI: Not at all. Mathematics is not a language, it’s an adventure. Do
musicians “speak another language” simply because they choose to
abbreviate their ideas with little black dots? If so, it’s no obstacle to
the toddler and her song. Yes, a certain amount of mathematical
shorthand has evolved over the centuries, but it is in no way essential.
Most mathematics is done with a friend over a cup of coffee, with a
diagram scribbled on a napkin. Mathematics is and always has been
about ideas, and a valuable idea transcends the symbols with which you
choose to represent it. As Gauss once remarked, “What we need are
notions, not notations.”
>>37917938
LMAO
>>37915286
lmao
>>37912050
20/5 (2*2)
20/5 (4)
4 (4)
16
L O G I C
O
G
I
C
>>37915286
That's my boy Hemingway! I haven't seen him in 16 years.
>>37917938
M A T H
A
T
H
>>37914990
ur a huge idiot i hope you know
>>37910757
What is on the curriculum these days?
>>37916585
>implying it's not the umbrella utility
well versed in retardation, aren't you?
>>37917938
>I've never learned how distribution works
>>37910762
>autism
okay you fucking dumbass when you have 5(4) and you claim that 5(4) = 16 that is multiplication which has the same order as division
>>37917938
my b >>37918561 was meant for >>37911931
nice math tho
>>37918559
It isn't lmao. There are plenty of math that doesn't apply to any part of the universe.
>this fucking stupid
>still baiting this hard
>>37917955
>>37918061
>>37918561
Oh, I see what I did wrong
>>37918617
ROFL
>>37918617
>>37909619
YOU FUCKING RETARDED PIECES OF SHIT THIS IS OVER THE REAL NUMBERS MEANING IT'S A FUCKING FIELD WHICH SATISFIES ASSOCIATIVITY WITH MULTIPLICATIVE INVERSES AND IT'S TRIVIAL FROM THERE ON. IF (.) DENOTES A FUCKING NUMBER THEN YOU SHOULD REALIZE THE OPERATION WITHIN THE BRACKETS FIRST
>>37918647
>t. I think using big words to convey simple info makes me seem smart
>>37918656
And it's irrelevant as well. In abstract algebra we use ^(-1) to denote inverses to avoid stupid notational ambiguities that led to all the retardation in this thread..
>>37918666
Pretty sure its used once you leave grade school
>>37909697
Do people really think you should stick to low weight on curls..? That's so fucking boring.
>>37917828
I don't see how this makes more sense than it being a language. Music is a language, math is a language, art is a language, we assume that a language is a "written" thing or something that can be written. But thats not exactly true. You can invent your own language without a written part of it. As long as it can be repeated and understood over time then it can hold up as a language. What you are thinking if is dialogue. Which is the written part of language.
>>37918711
It's fine if you don't understand but please refrain from making up stupid shit.
how many reps is high reps in high reps low weight brah.
asked my asian gf she said its 16 so stfu
>>37909619
That equation makes no sense
To get 1 it should be 20/(5(2*2))
To get 16 it should be (20/5)*(2*2)
The equation is missing brackets
>>37919398
No it's not. The answer is 16, cause math goes from left to right.
>>37919422
It is missing brackets though. And maths doesn't work from left to right it works on BODMAS. This is a question of if you should multiply the bracket by the attached digit first which would make it 20/20 or bracket then division then attachment which makes it 16. You're supposed to use the brackets to note what you do first and since that equation is retarded it misses it
>>37909619
goddamn bitch fix your projector
>>37919398
>>37919422
>>37919509
division is defined as multiplication with the multiplicative inverse of the numeral or variable to the right of the operation symbol, so /5 (or :5) means multiplying with one fifth.
Although you could argue there are, eventually there are no missing parenthesis, just ppl not being able to math; it's not logical to assume an operator applies to anything except the right next symbol
>>37909619
kek, this reminds me that many people think
1+1+1*0 = 0
>>37919591
dude it is 0 lol are you mentally ill
>>37919694
PEMDAS
Multiplayer first so it's 1 +1 + 0 = 2
The op image is regarded anyways, there's like 3 answers cause if ambiguity
>>37919714
Whoops ya I sperged out there. Shine on you crazy diamond
do the 30 day squat challenge :^)
>>37918042
This is correct because the brackets take precedence, then you work left to right. So it's 16.
>>37914184
Which means that a multiplication is also simply a division by the inverse of the multiplier, so the anon you responded to was also right.
I suspect he was gently baiting for the exact /sci/ autism that you are displaying.
>>37919422
>math goes from left to right.
ok
5 + 2 * 3 = 21
>>37921831
20/5(2*2)
20
= ------
5(2*2)
=20 over 20 = 1. Prove me wrong fags.
>>37919422
>math goes from left to right
No it doesn't lmao. Composition of maps goes from right to left.
>>37921831
Left to right following the order of operations
P-Parenthesis (Complete in order from left to right.)
E-Exponents
MD-Multiplication and Division (These are done at the same time in the order you run into them going left to right)
AS-Addition and Subtraction (Also done at the same time)
So we take an equation
20/5(2+2)
Look for P
D M P
20 / 5 ( 2 + 2 )
Now we have to complete the P before we continue our PEDMAS on the equation.
So we take what is in the P and apply PEDMAS to it from left to right
A
2 + 2
only A so we complete it and go back.
20 / 5 (4)
Now we look for E, and find none.
Next is MD which we have one of each.
D M
20 / 5 (4)
So we do them in order from left to right
D
20/5=4
leaving
M
4 (4)
4x4=16
And we do a quick check for AS
16
nope, no Addition or Subtraction left
We're done and the answer is
16
20
_______________
5 * ( 2 * 2 )
If both are right I take the old way any day
>>37909619
Congrats OP, masterfuly trolled
I love how you faggots get sperging about this shit. I do math for a living and when some faggot uses poorly written equation like this (only pages long and different type of possible ambiguities), I make them rewrite it to check the validity if I spot such dumb faggotry.
Why would I rely on some other doofus knowing the order of operations in this shit as they hand it to me when I can smack them and tell them to make it so clear even the fucking noob machinist wouldn't make a mistake. I chose math because I don't want to rely on faggots making mistakes and losing time because they wanted to use some obscure fucking notation to appear smart, asking for validation takes whopping 3 seconds.
But oh please do continue, KEKing hard here at your attempts to look smart. I didn't know /sci/ visited /fit/. How much do you have to massage your egos to visit TWO narcissistic boards, ffs.
>>37922150
Depends on if it's 20 divided by five times 2^2 or if it's 20 over five times 2^2.
>>37925640
>I do math for a living
Doubtful. What field?
>>37925760
cashier @ 7-11
>>37925760
ATM I make sure bots on production lines do the shit they are supposed to do, don't break under changing loads and can successfuly operate with big blocks of material as well as tiny electronics, despite the stupidity of their operators. What I will do when I get bored of this, who knows, studying chem on the side, maybe will kick back, take up law and be a consultant when I get tired of BS.
>>37918666
>American college abstract algebra = european middle school math class
>>37925896
So you don't do math for a living. Got it.
