Is a body like this even possible natty? How many years would you have to lift to even get close to this level of perfection?
Also bodies you'd go full homo for thread
>>37774210
No this is not possible natty
Not possible
>>37774210
Impossible natty
Maybe for 1/1000 genetics, training three years with perfect diet but probably no
Theoretically possible, but top .1% bodybuilding genetics required, plus alot of work to boot.
>>37774210
What's he stacking?
>>37774210
Possible if you were me, but impossible with your dyel genetics
>>37774279
>three years
kek
>>37774279
>>37774288
I've always wondered, how does one know what their natty limit is? Is it something you'll only know once you've reached it?
>>37774329
Why do you ask retarded questions?
When you are no longer progressing, it means you've reached your limit
Is that hard to grasp?
What about a body (like the OP) signals that it isn't natty?
>>37774210
no, it's not possible
if you're 5'4, with epic bodybuilding genetics and that pic is taken with a pump in good lighting
then maybe
>>37774352
or youre doing it wrong
>>37774358
>Big
>Lean
>Natty
Pick 2
>>37774328
Don't kek because you wasted the first two years of lifting with shitty routine and diet
>>37774526
Big is subjective
>>37774352
>When you are no longer progressing, it means you've reached your limit
Are you trolling or just a retard pretending to know anything? If you no longer progressing you prob doing fitness wrong
>>37774210
Might be possible for one in a million but it's save to assume you're not one of those. But hey, shoot for the moon and even if you miss, you'll be among stars.
>>37774720
>>37774451
I meant if you are doing everyitnh correcly but you got no more progress, it means you've reached your limit
is it even possible to look like this /fit/?
i've been working out once every other week for one week and, and have cut all poptarts out of my diet, but i still dont look like this.
>>37775019
yeah its possible arnold did it
>>37774279
Three yrs for this chest/delts/forearms...
u dun goofd m8 pls go
>>37774968
It means you haven't tried everything
>>37775019
>is it even possible to look like this /fit/?
No, Arnold is not real. He never existed.
>>37774210
Yes it is fucking possible natty. Work hard and you can do anything. Genetics do help of course.
>>37774720
Havent seen the
>natty limit
Meme in so long lul
Higher quality image
>>37775472
Depends on height and weight.
A 5'4 guy, yeah that's doable natty (with serious hard work).
A 6'2 guy? Nah, not doable natty.
>>37775497
Even at 5'4 that wouldn't be possible. Tiny was 5'4, and while he looked great, he was never that jacked.
>>37774329
this site:
http://www.naturalphysiques.com/28/fat-free-mass-index-ffmi
has a calculator, and they use this study which was done on athletes:
http://journals.lww.com/cjsportsmed/Abstract/1995/10000/Fat_Free_Mass_Index_in_Users_and_Nonusers_of.3.aspx
>The normalized FFMI values of athletes who had not used steroids extended up to a well-defined limit of 25.0.
25 ffmi at 6'0 (my height) is ~205lbs at 11%bf which is this guy's stats exactly.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161825563&pagenumber=1
Lol when did /fit/ become a bunch of scrubs. Yes it's possible, with years of hard work and dedication.
>These dyel nerds saying it ain't possible.
>>37774526
fat
>>37775583
>dyel nerds
Protip: They are permabulkers.
>>37775098
Tren and hgh. Amiright?
>>37775534
Tiny was also on anavar iirc
>>37775570
There were actually a handful of bodybuilders in the pre-steroid era who had FFMI of slightly over 25, but I'll assume that those are the rare genetic freaks.
The highest FFMI ever achieved natty was probably Jack Delinger who had 28 in 1949. Steroids were not used by athletes outside of clinical trials until 1951. He was obviously a major outlier.
>>37775583
lol, when your noob gains dry up you'll understand
>>37775497
why is it possible for a short guy but not for a tall one?
>>37775737
Manlets.
>>37775737
The same amount of muscle looks bigger on short people than on tall people because if you're tall the muscle is stretched out over a longer distance
here's another formula for working out the natural limit (based on anecdotal experience) - his calculations come out at 24 ffmi instead of 25 (7lbs less lean mass at 6'0), although he's talking about what's possible at very low bf%..
http://www.leangains.com/2010/12/maximum-muscular-potential.html
>>37775570
Yeah mine calculated out to 210. I'm a little over 6' so that number makes sense. You find this on vitruvian physiques channel?
Don't listen to any of these fat autistic. Anyone who is over 120 with a low bodyfat is not natty to these fucking skinnyfat and fat pieces of shit. None of them have work ethic, they just sit around and complain how people who are better than them arn't natty to try and make themselves feel a little better. Honestly if you are dedicated then this is achievable naturally, you just have to put in the time and work.
>>37775813
>You find this on vitruvian physiques channel?
yeah, it might have been from him. I remember seeing those videos now that I take a look. I've been using this calculator for a while now.
>>37774210
>that gyno
>natty
Pick one
It might not look that big but believe me, at that bodyfat its fucking huge when youre not comparing it to other fraudsters
>>37774210
eh he look okay
>>37775019
Bullshit If you actually stopped eating poptarts, you'd be pulling 6pl8 by now.
>>37775758
this
I look stronger than some guys who've been lifting longer/more weight just because I'm shorter
>>37776369
I don't think you know what gyno is
>>37775472
anyone got pics of similar bodies? I think I might've found my goal
>>37777213
>>37776887
Okay maybe I have a one or two on my rest days, but other than that, I have none. Also my nightly routine of 10 press ups and 20 sit ups isn't working. what do, /fit/?
>>37774210
is it possible to get abs like that natty?
Don't listen to these people they're all dyel faggots with no motivation. After years of bbing with good diet I'm sure this is possible. Not for a good while though.
I want those nipples for dinner
>>37774682
"Big" means capped delts
>>37775472
even this isn't legit look at the PhotoShop work on his pec area...
>>37774279
I was thinking 5-6 years with around the clock strict diet and lifting regiment
>>37775472
if bf % was a little higher (abs not as defined but still visible), would it be achievable within 3 yrs natty, do y'all think?
roid delts, no
most obvious tell is delts
im natty and have veins on my shoulder and they arent nearly that round
>>37775866
I cant wait for the day you realise you are wrong
>>37779363
4 to 5 years + genetics
>>37780034
how many hours a eek?
>>37774358
Cannonball delts and hyuge traps are a dead giveaway.
Basically frauds can be lean and still get big at the same time. Us mortals really can't. It depends though, at a healthy BF% you can look pretty damn jacked as a natty if you spend enough time building mass.
>>37774210
>6'4 205 liftan 4 years
>neverskipcoreday
Ignored core/cutting for the first 3 years and looked like shit
>>37780053
4 days
3 rest days
>>37775661
if u think this is natty you are fucking retarded
>>37780388
It is, retard
>>37780034
>>37780383
you have given me hope brah, I'm gonna lift with twice as much fervor from now on
>>37775122
>>37775583
>>37775866
>>37778834
Trust in yourself and you can achieve anything ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :^)
>>37775019
>once every other week for one week
top cake
>>37775661
>Steroids were not used by athletes outside of clinical trials until 1951.
but they were. First testosterone injection was in 1889. You couldn't buy it anywhere, but you can't buy it today without prescription, yet people manage to inject it somehow.
definitely possible natty. minimum 5 years consistent training.
>>37780369
Why would you take a picture with only a fucking candle for lighting?
>>37774682
For you
>>37780369
whats your core routine look like?
>>37781267
Blok mogic
>>37783481
Heavy deads/squats
Hanging core twists
Hanging knee raises
Hanging bicycle kicks
Chinup knee raises
Chinup core twists
