I'm a casual weightlifter with about 12% bodyfat.
I have 17 inch biceps and a 50 inch chest just measured. I'm 6'2.
Do I look twig, or is it slightly to make look twice?
>I'm a casual weightlifter with about 12% bodyfat.
you made the b8 too obvious....
>>37675045
what?
my friend doesn't even lift and he's 11% according to a bodpod
Post body and let's laugh
>>37674922
post pic
>>37674922
Is that fucking JavaScript?
>>37677979
It could be C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript or any language that uses the same syntax.
(Yes, calling functions like that by dot notation is possible in C, using functions pointers inside structs.)
>>37674922
why do /g/entomans only visit /fit/ in the summer?
its too late now buddy...
>>37678494
>(Yes, calling functions like that by dot notation is possible in C, using functions pointers inside structs.)
>>37679016
http://pastebin.com/JVmiVcvx
It's a bit clunky though. Note that if you want to change a state of the struct itself you need to send a pointer to the struct to the function, meaning you would have functions like this inside the struct:
void (*modify_self)(struct self* s, other arguments ...);
And a corresponding definition outside, calling it like:
s.modify(s, other arguments ...);
>>37679016
>>37679144
To add to my previous comment, this is basically what higher-level languages (C++, Java etc) do under the hood.
There's a book called "Object Oriented C" or something like that which you can check out if you're interested.
>>37679016
>>37679144
>>37679157
But you should in 99% of cases prefer the C way of doing it, i.e. having free functions that operate on data instead of trying to create an object-oriented system from scratch. If you need that kind of object orientation but still want "control", just use C++.
>>37679180
>But you should in 99% of cases prefer the C way of doing it, i.e. having free functions that operate on data instead of trying to create an object-oriented system from scratch. If you need that kind of object orientation but still want "control", just use C++.
should've told that to gnome
