>>37453715
>Test levels checked
if you want

also cut to 10% then bulk.

>>37453715
Lift more.
Cut to 10%
Bulk to 15%

Rinse and repeat

What if your weight is too low to be possible to lose enough weight to cut to 10%? is 12-13 a good enough result? Also what kind of caloric surplus is suggested? standard +500? or something less?

>>37453911
that would mean you calculated your bf worng

>>37453911
If you have a higher body fat than 10%, then your bodyweight can never be too low to lose.

You could be 175 lean with 6%
Or 175 with 18%. Which one do you think would look better?

If you're skinny fat your options are to either cut until you reach around 10% then clean bulk by +500 cal surplus to minimize fat gain, or go straight to the bulk then cut.

>>37454377
You should also just eat at matinence for a while after you hit 10% before you bulk

>>37454377
I'm 5'11 and started 2.5 months ago as 163 lbs 20% bodyfat.
Now I am arount 144 lbs at 13% bodyfat or so.

Right now I am eating at 1250 kcals per day. Was thinking about starting to bulk because it's been a bit vexing keeping this caloric intake + cardio.
Since my maintainance is at around 1950 kcals or so, I thought about adding 100 kcals per week until I get back to maintainance before starting the actual bulk. That way I will keep cutting, even if at a lower rate, for another month and a half. What do you think about it?

>>37454377
>>37454419
I'm probably gonna use the same method too when I'll start bulking, I've heard in other threads that it's not good to just add 500 kcals out of the blue. 100 kcals per week seem like a good amount to me

>>37454377
breh how do I get 10 from the 12-13 mark? I seem to just stall

>>37453715
Kek that kid is just fat

>>37454419
You can eat at maintenance or -100 Cal's on off days, While only doing surplus on lift days.

I started out as skinny fat and just went full bulk. Now I'm just plain old fat. At least I'm strong.

>>37453715

eat less

lift more

>>37453715
You can be skinny fat with any bone structure though.

Maybe stop eating xenoestrogenes and other endocrine disruptors. " Skinny fat " doesn't actually exists, its what uneducated people refer to chemical castration the government is doing on its people. No man prior to 1960 was skinny fat because these xenoestrogenes didnt exists back then. Does no one ever think of why so many men are infertile and develop female like sex characteristics?

>>37457707
where they come from?

>>37457707
I'll bite
Explain this shit

>>37457707
Go on...

>>37457707
You have my attention.

>>37453715
I have a question: why do you use the term "skinnyfat"?
Fat distribution varies among people, what specific distribution makes someone "skinnyfat"?
Heavy hips/ass/thighs deposition, like in that pic?
But doesn't that mean skinnyfat is a good thing, since that fat deposition pattern is linked to a lower rate of morbidity from heart disease iirc? (compared to other fat men who carry the fat around their core)

>>37459097
skinnyfat=fat with no muscle
desu senpai

>>37459145
isn't that just fat tho?
eg cubicle workers

>>37453715
Hey, that's me. Only difference is that my stomach is huge as well. Guess I can call myself skinnyfat now.

>>37453736
>>37453736
I'm 6'4" and 73 kgs and still am at like 15% bodyfat. keep cutting? I already had to get new pants because my old just fall right off at this point.

>>37459097
Only a bit of extra fat, but still a moderately high bf% because the person has very little muscle.

>>37459204
Yes, but people like to create stupid terms