For approximately 1650 calories you can get 170 prots, 100 carbs, 63 fats. Tell me again why you're not cutting at a 1000 cals deficit? You didn't fall for the 1g+ prots per body lbs meme, didn't you? lmao
because you feel like complete shit 90% of the time and lose a serious amount of strength? there's a huge difference between a 500 cal deficit and a 1000 cal deficit
1g/lbs+ of protein actually makes sense when you're cutting heavy. you need more protein on a cut than on a surplus.
Not all of us are 150 lb manlets.
Because I'm not a twink faggot that thinks he needs to be 5% bf or girls won't talk to him.
>>37292127
>you need more protein on a cut than on a surplus
nope
lmao 170g of protein
who the fuck needs that much
enjoy your glucogenesis, renal stress and build up of kidney stones
Because a 1000 cal cut for my manlet body is 1200 calories total
because i cut on 2600kcal you idiot
>>37292091
>Tell me again why you're not cutting at a 1000 cals deficit?
Because my maintenance is approx. 1600-1700 cals. That's why.
>>37292147
spotted the fatass permabulker
>>37292173
Nice made up words ...
>>37292278
why are you cutting if that's your maintenance? go bulk, skelly
>>37292156
>glucogenesis
Do you have any idea what you're talking about?
Christ you guys must be skeletons.
>Tfw cutting at 3500 cals
>Tfw consistent weight loss
>>37292389
Christ you must be a fucking fatass, unless you're doing like 2 hours of cardio a day
>>37292352
What you mean manlet?
>>37292421
6'7" 230, moderate cardio and lifting.
>>37292422
Don't use that word you know which one I'm talking about
>>37292446
>6'7''
king of the lanklets
>>37292446
can I ride your back naked and swing swords while screaming like a maniac
5'10 muay thai dwarf
>>37292446
Dude if I rode your back we would be a MKX character
>>37292446
>6'7" 230, moderate cardio and lifting.
>>37292153
ratio wise
>>37292124
Losing serious strength and feeling like shit on 100g carbs and 170 prots? lel
>>37292091
how come nobody asked about this
SEMEN
E
M
E
N
DEMON
E
M
O
N
>>37293007
because the fake red hair is disgusting
>>37293004
no, losing serious strength on 1700 calories. You can maximize all the protein and carbs you want into a small caloric budget, the lack of calories will still fuck you.
>>37292478
>lanklet
/fit/ truly is dead. the term is L A N K E T. There's only one L you retards.
>>37293004
you think your TDEE and BMR are just random figures? if you're eating ~ 40% below your TDEE of course it's going to have a huge effect on your strength and energy levels, and a larger effect than if you're just eating ~ 20% below it
>>37293270
>fake red hair is disgusting