Wtf is wrong with my arm anyone help?
What seems to be the officer, problem?
that's a tumor man
>>37229039
Y it looks so weird anyone help
I look duel from 1 angle but good from another
>>37229014
This is literally what curlbro arms look like, i can tell you never had to hold onto heavy shit doing deadlifts or something.
Enjoy your "bicep pump"
Looks like a case of brocurling. Your bicep is developed to some extent, while at the same time you have 0 (zero) triceps and forearms.
IMO triceps are more important because they making up 2/3 of the mass of the arm
>>37229121
>impliying
jesus christ what is that bump on your arm
>>37229014
WHERE ARE YOUR TRICEP MUSCLES!?!?!
>>37229185
I don't get that. Why would the triceps be like that in ratio to the biceps?
Shouldn't they be the same since they work in tandem?
>>37229014
You're like me. Short biceps and weak triceps.
How much you curling op?
>>37229222
they have different functions, working in tandem only sometimes. bicep is primarily for pull, tricep is primarily for push.
work triceps
>>37229327
Then work shoulders, then back, then chest, then legs, then calves then thank us
>>37229014
if you're going to curl at least do hammer curls or reverse BB curls so you can hit your forearms more. and for the love of god do some dips or tricep pushdowns or something.
Op here I rely don't think I'm that duel though so why does my arm look weird in that lighting
Here good full body maybe I'm still dyel but not as bad as first pic
>>37229022
Good one
>>37229570
Forgot pic
>>37229581
I don't think my triceps looks that underdeveloped in this pic as you guys are saying
>>37229581
Jesus Christ he's got no legs...no wonder he's a curlbro
>>37229581
Op you are the true definition of natty.
Look like shit unless you get perfect lighting and angles
>>37229607
Tfw this dyel looks better than 90% on ppl on fit but they still laugh at his
