Is this legit? Can you really burn so much calories with this?
Yeah, it's called cardio. Read the fucking sticky.
>>36935153
No, probably 100 -150 calories in that
>>36935190
150 calories is 10 minutes on an exercise bike. There's way more than that.
>>36935190
100 jumping jacks alone will burn at least 100 calories if you do them quick enough. Burpees, despite being a meme, are also alright for calorie burning.
That being said, keeping up the pace/intensity is key. The people who share this shit on Facebook will wind up doing maybe 20 good jumping jacks, fuck around the other 80, and have diminishing form on the other exercises as they continue moving down the list. You could burn 1000 calories doing that, but anybody that would do that circuit won't
>>36937015
Why are burpees a meme ? Did I miss something ?
>>36935153
Do you know the weight enter in the calorie calculation ?
So it depend.
>>36937056
High likelihood of rekking joints
>>36937103
But if I do it controlled and I'm not a fat fuck, will it still fuck up my joints ?
>>36935213
150 calories is no 10 minutes on an exercise bike not unless you weigh 300lbs.
>>36937071
weight, gender, age, vo2max, average heartrate during exercise and time of exercise. All these factor in.
>>36937015
>100 jumping jacks alone will burn at least 100 calories if you do them quick enough.
No. Just no. Jumping jacks at a brisk pace are maybe comparable to biking at moderate intensity, and you'll only burn about 1 calorie per 10 seconds of biking at a decent pace
>>36935153
What surprises you here? This is a shitton of volume.
>>36935213
>150
>10 mins
Jesus anon what did you do with the rest of the calories?? I thought the average loss on the bike was 20 per mins
>>36935153
Most likely not. Probably near 500-700c, depending.
Why would you even want to burn 1000c?
Just eat less, and maybe walk a bit more or cycle, it requires an 1/8th of the effort.
>>36937056
They're shit, and for kewl crossfit kids.
Not bad if you want some sort of cardio that you can do in your basement, but jumpng rope would be 99x better.
>>36937152
>at a brisk pace
>ignoring the "if you do them quick enough"
Come on, lad
>>36937121
>if i do them controlled
It decreases the likelihood of injury, but depending on the speed and your cardio level, you will more than likely see some form degradation, especially if you're working in a circuit
>>36937121
dude you're fine.
taking advice from a board that recommends shit like GOMAD and heavy squats and Deadlifts to complete beginners is going to get you some broscience and bad info
>>36937015
If you think 100 jumping jacks burns 100 calories you are without a doubt retarded.
>>36935153
That's a lot of shit and it'd take you a while to do, would probably be more efficient to just go running or something
>>36937056
Honestly there's not a lot of point to them
You're better off just doing jumping jacks and push ups
If you're trying to train recovery from the ground (lying down -> getting up), ie if you were in a sport like rugby, you're really better off just practicing getting up and sprinting 10 yards in one smooth movement
Running for an hour is going to burn like 500kcal, You really think that this shit is going to burn a 1000 ?
I don't think people realize how hard it is to burn 1000 calories with cardio.
This is more like 200-300 calories depending on your weight and fitness level. Most people cant even burn 1000 calories in an hour at near maximum heart rate.
