Or is it still a bad body type? I've seen worse non-lifting bodies than this one, but I'm curious of the general ratings ppl on here would give him from a 1-10 (10 being good)
>>36751560
I mean he's got a super handsome face, so at that point it doesn't really matter. Also he's got a manly hairy chest too. Me, I'm hairless on the chest, so if I had that body I'd look weird. Too many factors here
>>36751560
This is a fine body type if you're an alcoholic name partner at a multi-million dollar New York advertising agency who fucks whoever he wants anyway.
>>36751595
you forgot the qt3.14 jailbait daughter
Is a dad bod a negative term or a positive term?
>>36751590
Handsome face counts but bodies count too. A face is only 50% of your overall attractiveness.
>>36751590
So if his chest wasn't hairy it would make him look worse, is what ur saying.
Put a goofy looking no chin bald bong face on that body and its 0/10 any way you cut it.
>>36751641
It depends on how you view the dadbod and those who have it. When the use of the term became popular, it was used as a "preference" by some female bloggers. The idea was that someone with a dadbod is more "laid-back" and more "comfortable in his own skin". It's a meme created by insecure women and lazy men.
Sources:
http://theodysseyonline.com/clemson/dad-bod/97484
http://www.msn.com/en-au/health/medical/beer-bellies-are-in-biceps-are-out-introducing-the-dad-bod/ar-BBjewl7
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/05/11/i-have-a-dad-bod-heres-why-women-love-it/
http://m.nydailynews.com/entertainment/hollywood-hottest-dad-bods-gallery-1.2216674
http://www.bustle.com/articles/80345-what-is-dad-bod-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-phrase-and-phenomenon
http://www.newsner.com/en/2015/05/forget-about-the-gym-right-now-the-hottest-trend-is-beer-bellies-and-love-handles/
>>36751560
A "normal" human male body.
>>36751650
>this is what ugly people actually believe
face is everything unless you're rich
He's handsome and he has such a massive dick it clearly shows through his trousers in every day life (no homo but I've seen it and would suck on it)
If you have a pretty face and a 10 inch dick and you're also a famous actor you don't need much else
>>36751560
>tall
>manly aesthetic face
>wide shoulders
>hammaconda (pic)
Women really do not give a fuck about being swole if you have all those atributes
>>36751560
>Handsome, masculine face
>Has the three most attractive 'fit' qualities without lifting (wide shoulders, strong forearms, lack of unsightly fat deposits eg. beer belly, man tits, etc)
>Better than average hairline & density for his age
>Tall
>Good amount of body hair - attractive and masculine, but not a furry freak
>Large-ish hands without looking like a chunky butterfingers
>Good facial hair genes
>Visibly large penis
Even if he wasn't famous, he wouldn't need to lift to be a hit with the ladies.
So yes, this is a good non-lifting body type.
>>36753810
>>36754138
>tfw have a big donger but am a grower not a shower
>will never be able to advertise my girth and virility to sluts and gayboys
>>36751560
I look very similar to him, forearms, insertions etc but not face (a bit stronger but not much), and I lift.
> tfw 6'5
Feels good tho
>>36755012
>>very similar to him
Yes you do, buddy. Yes you do.
>>36755050
Unfortunately not face wise
Body wise pretty much the same but taller and bit stronger heh
I have no particular interest in gymbros. I mean I fall for who I fall for and I see bodies that look nice objectively as nice like I'm looking at a painting; there is no incentive to just jump on a dick without knowing personality.
That being said, having browsed /fit/ alot, it now seems odd to see a guy so broad chested with small biceps. If his chest was equally small I doubt it'd matter.
>>36755163
TITS OR GTFO
>>36755151
FACE
HEIGHT
FRAME
Jon Hamm is very good looking, even though he isn't very aesthetic. He's just a normal man, with a great face and nice hair.
I think normal women don't care about aesthetics, having them is just a plus.
>>36755224
pros
> 6'5
> frame as wide as Hamm's, if not thicker
> 7½ in. cock
cons
> looks moroccan
;)
>>36751560
(no homo)
He's got good posture and face/skull structure.
His body is fucking skinnyfat shit that needs clothes to look good.
>>36751560
>a decent non-lifting body
such a thing does not exist
>10/10 face
>6'2
He doesn't need to lift.
>>36751650
sorry dude, that's bullshit.
His body is a fucking mess. He acts like clothing makes the man but the unclothed shots in mad men show how scrawny he is. He has the complete attitude of "i dont need to work out so why should i"
What a twink
>>36751933
God, those articles make me reeve
Some where complete cucks
>>36751650
>being this fucking retarded
>>36751665
Not exactly, but it distracts you from his weak pecs
>>36751560
how can he have such forearms if he doesn't even lift?
