symmetric strength thread
>tfw SS
>>36687928
it still baffles me why people fall for this every time
especially young guys in high school/college
kinda pointless. unless you have average proportions there's no reason the ratios your between your lifts should be average. also, novices usually have lifts that are all over the place for various reasons
>squatdaddy
>>36687940
>who would want strong legs, ass and back
Idk.
183cm or 6 feet
82kg-180lbs
what did i win?
>>36688240
how is your squat that weak
>>36688096
>back
Especially this. Posture has fucked me up real good, but these days I feel better already.
guess height and weight :^)
>>36688296
>another retard who skips legs
>>36688343
I actually did SS
>>36688296
5'2" 520 lbs?
Why is my squat so shit after so long on SS
>>36688381
Physically impossible
Should I switch to low bar? I'm tired of having my legs be novice tier.
>>36688296
>>36688381
then 6'6
>>36688487
>he thinks bringing more back into it will help his legs
You fucking idiot, go on smolov or something.
>>36688419
>>36688514
nah
>>36688472
its true. i dont even question it anymore, i guess god decided i shouldn't be doing squats
>>36688487
If people can front Squat 250kg, then you can stop being a pussy and Squat better.
https://youtu.be/NlXB-80St4c
>>36688487
>>36688569
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kusTva3oIwo&nohtml5=False
>>36688569
>>36688579
>If this genetically gifted world class olympic lifter, who is also on every drug known to man, can do it then surely this every joe natty guy can do it too
>>36688600
No it fucking means he should be able to get out of fucking novice doing normal back squats
way to take things out of proportion you weak undedicated fuck
>>36688458
1. you don't bounce out of the bottom of it
2. you don't lift with your hips at the bottom phase
3. you don't position the bar on your back properly
its probably one of these.