Heart says yes, brain says no.
His bone structure makes him look the way he does. Definitely achievable natty, he's actually pretty small
>>36543084
No.
http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2014/1002/582609/update-on-drug-usage-in-wwe-wrestlers-reportedly-cheating/
people actually believe this isnt achievable without roids ? are your expectations THAT low ?
>>36543148
No shit he juices, but the question is whether his physique is achievable natty. Answer is yes.
Fuck's sake, does anyone on /fit/ have over a year of lifting?
>>36543084
OP, I'M AFRAID I'VE GOT SOME BAD NEWS FOR YOU
>>36543162
It's achievable natty. Few, if any, WWE wrestlers actually are natty, though
OP, why would you wanna look like that jobber anyway?
>>36543162
Spotted the guy who has been lifting for one month and thinks Jeff Seid is natty
>big
>lean
>natty
>in under a decade of serious, consistent training
Pick three
>>36543177
No. Take a break from the board and come back to it after a month or two. It really hits you how dumb and inexperienced most people are on /fit/
>>36543214
I know, I know. But he isn't really big, is he?
I would like to be lean and natty.