![1420110233951[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/cplBoZD.png "1420110233951[1].png")
>he weighs his food before cooking it
This picture makes me really want a home spa
>>36479177
what's the point in weighing your food after? You should weigh the ingredients beforehand. Portions are typically done by volume anyway.
>>36479573
>100g of uncooked chicken have the same macros as 100g of cooked chicken!
no.
>he walks into the gym without changing clothes before the workout
>>36479963
The nutrition will stay the same, it'll just weigh less. One uncooked chicken breast will have the same protein as that chicken breast when cooked, just it'll be 80g instead of 100
> he does not swallow his post-workout cum.
>>36479177
>Keeping books in a wetroom
Triggered
>>36479995
no
you weight what youre about to put in your mouth
Cook your chicken , get 100g eat it
>>36479995
>>36479177
I weigh myself too before I get baked
don't nutrition facts labels HAVE to have nutrition before preparation?
I weigh all my meats, veggies, etc. after prep but anything with a nutrition facts label I weigh before
>>36481422
>>36481422
Depends on the nutritional label. Some list as sold, some list as cooked. If the label lists before and I weigh it cooked I just round it up to be on the safe side.
>>36481422
>>36479995
>THIS ARE THE PEOPLE GIVING YOU ADVICE
>>36479995
This is true if im not mistaken. If 300g of raw chicken has X amount of protein, even if you cook it and it's 230g chicken when cooked it still has X amounts of protein.
Meats will lose weight after cooking because of loss of moisture and fat, typically you can see about 20-30% reduction in total weight after cooking but you should weigh it before cooking to count the calories and macros properly
An example is ground beef, it will lose a few grams of fat during cooking which you will drain away and not eat so you know that it's best to weigh before the cooking starts
>>36479995
>>36482054
>>36482110
TROLLING OR AUTISTIC
only works with shit like rice because water.
you weight your meat AFTER COOKING it.
eating 100g cooked chicken ISN'T the same as eating le 100g uncooked now 80g cooked meme chicken.
>>36481390
no.
>>36481448
>>36481546
labels have to have accurate information of what's in the package as it is. They can't guess how you're going to prepare your food and give you information that way.
>>36482177
This. It's just water evaporating. It's pointless measuring it before cooking.
>>36482177
>>36482204
this has got to be some low level bait
it's always best to log food before you prepare it. Info for raw chicken is more accurate than info for "cooked" chicken. You can turn 10oz of raw chicken to anything from 8 to 4oz of cooked chicken. More accurate, consistent to do raw.
>>36482256
yeah i thought this too, this thread really got me by the dick
