Is Hugh Jackman peak natty?
>>36077684
Good question, I would say yes, simply because he's small. Everything else is Hollywood magic.
>>36077684
You mean Huge Jackedman?
Hugh jackmon is on roids fyi
more like Huge Jacked Man
>>36077684
You know he does like 50 pushups right before every single take, right?
>>36077684
he's gay though.
>>36077804
If anything that just makes him seem more masculine to me. That fact that he only fucks other men rather some weak and prissy girl.
>>36077758
>>36077693
>>36077791
>hollywood
>natty
pick one
>>36077872
>tfw you'll never see a leaked hugh jackman sextape where he's pounding the boipussy of some young twink and cums inside him
Why even live ;_;
>>36078053
literally perfection
In an interview Jackman stated that he had a weight set just off camera and would lift to exhaustion before doing his scenes so that he would have the best pump and vascularity.
>>36078982
>and you believed this hollywood star
>>36077684
Yeah I honestly believe Hugh Jackman is natty. I know that not a lot of people will believe me but I think that, just looking at him and his routine/diet/years of training, he's one of the few, proud, and natty. And if anything argues, hey you don't have any proof, either. Nobody is gonna drug test him, but I honestly think he looks pretty natty
You'd have to retarded to think he is natty. His back acne is ridiculous in that lady Wolverine movie set in Japan.
Why does everyone do roids anyway, is it impossible for some people to reach certain levels of fitness without them? Or is it just a shortcut?
>>36079132
>is it impossible for some people to reach certain levels of fitness without them? Or is it just a shortcut?
both
>>36079114
I have back acne and I've never done roids
>>36079132
It can be a shortcut to the natty limit, and can then be used to surpass it
some physiquies are possible natty while some are not
>>36079138
You're an idiot.
>>36079149
sorry
>>36079143
do you have examples?
are roids like the scientific way to bypass the limitations of people with poor genetics?
>>36078053
>those veins at the end
never noticed before. Dude is vascular as fuark
>>36077767
As you can see, nobody laughs at your jokes. You know why? Because they sucks.
>>36079162
generally anabolics will increase testosterone levels above the natural amount, meaning that its easier to synthesise muscles (thus roids = more gains).
Roids are advantageous should an individual have sub-par natural testosterone levels.
They can't change your insertions though
>natty in hollywood
lmao
>>36077684
He's over that by a fair amount.
Impressive and something most men will kill themselves to achieve, but not even close to natural peak
Imagine that but less chest mass smaller shoulders and a bit more fat and hair.
There.
Natty.
>natty
>>36077804
But he's not.
>>36077791
he was also dehydrated as fuck in this scene, watched an interview about how much prep work he did for a few seconds of film.
>>36077684
Very unlikely to be natty. Hollywood actors are known to use gear for just about every role that requires them to buff up these days. They can get it legally prescribed by a reliable hollywood doctor and use it 100% safely.
They could spend a year or two dreamer bulking and 9 months cutting to get the bodies they have but that just isn't practical when you accept a role that requires you to be buff and need to shoot in 6 months time. If you did buff up naturally over a long period, it's also not practical because you'd get a little fat bulking and nobody wants a fat hugh jackman in their movies, and they might need to play a role where they're skinny or have just an ordinary physique, etc, and they can't do that for the 3 years they're preparing for 6 weeks of shooting with their shirt off.
Plus look at huge jackedman in the above webm, he has that gear look where you have very full muscle bellies whilst being lean and water cut that you just hardly get while natty. Most actors will do a cycle of anavar or some shit at least before they film to fill out what needs filling out and to give them that cut and dry look. I'd say the main reason actors will not admit it and rarely talk about their body transformations is because of negative public backlash and they'll lose some of their star power because of the common conception that steroids are bad.
At least that's what fat jason blaha said a while back about ben affleck in the new batman. He may not know everything but he knows his shit about gear use and personally, you can just see it in most leading men these days, they have the cell tech look.
>>36077684
> any hollywood actor
> natty
Pick one
>>36078053
He spread his legs so wide in that shot.
Did he have his dick taped to his stomach or something?
>>36079326
I think Chris Evans is natty.
Can't think of too many big guys in hollywood who would be though.
>>36077693
>small
He's 6'3.
>>36079075
But that's true you idiot. Men always have a pump when they do shirtless scenes.
He's 13 years older in the right pic. He's been getting consistently bigger and more shredded since X1 and he's in his 40s now. There's no way he's natty.
>>36079326
Danny devito
how do I into jean valjean mode
>>36079298
Well, yeah, the only way to get those certain looks is with insane preperation.
See, shwarzeneggar and Stallone and Reeves fucked it up for every nigga on the planet.
Everyone has to be swole as fuck, dry, shrinkwrapped, and have utterly unattainable mass.
AND be natty.
Not possible.
AT ALL
You CAN look like a hollywood actor/fitness model but it will be long YEARS of hardwork and maintaining a strict as fuck diet to look like that only a few times in a year.
That's just how that shit is.
It's totally unattainable for the average natural person and for the gifted natural it is an unbelievably arduous and horribly painful process.
The moment NANOSECOND that anyone is exposed in a real way that they are on gear? They're called a fraud and a bitch and kicked.
Why? Because they sell themselves as better not because they have access to better drugs but because they are physically better because of hardwork. And the ENTIRE fucking fitness and athletic industry lives and dies by this outright lie.
If hardwork won't get them that results and they can pretend that they only have to workout really really hard with "you're the best uh huh nothing is gonna bring you down" playing loudly in the background to get what they have.
That's just how it is.
>>36079399
Steal bread and get imprisoned.
>>36079399
crunches x 24601
>>36077684
He's at least on TRT (which I don't really consider actual roiding. There's simply no way you can seriously continue lifting beyond 40 without TRT)
>>36078053
>/fit/ calls this small
>>36079385
Or you know, he started lifting more?
Are you saying people can't look ripped in their 40's?
>>36079650
>putting testosterone into your body
>actual roiding
pick both
adada
>>36079155
Top kek
>>36077684
No just do a cycle faggot. Lifes too short. Theres a thread in some forum about hollywood insiders and roids. Apperantly jackman roided for xmen 3. Christian bale is one too.
>>36079674
You know test levels start dropping after you hit your 30, right? He was already 31 in X1 when he looked like an average dude, then suddenly he starts getting bigger and leaner with every movie despite getting older. At 45 he was at his biggest and leaners yet. He's obviously on gear.
>>36079825
That would assume that all other factors were equal, so he trained equaly as much before as he does now.
You have no idea if he actualy does.
The slight drops in testosterone level after 30 in no way mean that he could not look more ripped after his 30's than before if he was simply training and eating better
>>36079637
Under-rated.
>>36077684
>>36079322
bruh Hugh Jackman doesn't get fit for film roles, I'm pretty sure he's a regular gym-goer
I haven't checked his social media stuff, but I remember this photo he put up from a while ago
>'if the bar ain't bendin, then you're just pretendin'
>>36079995
Lol I remember this picture, his first 4pl8 iirc. He's only really gotten jacked in the last like 6 years or so and that began with the wolverine movie. I'd say he was on the sauce to get big initially then he's just stayed on trt or something and been consistently hitting the gym since then. Maybe did a small cycle to get a little bigger for the latest wolverine. I've met hugh once briefly and he's not that big in person, plus he seemed incredibly humble and honest so I think there's a small chance he's mostly natty and just put in years in the gym and is on trt. Defs not a true natty though.
But in almost all other cases and possibly this one, actors use gear to get buff and lean quickly. Lot's of information out there regarding this
>>36079857
Dude, stop it. He is 47 and looks leaner and bigger than most 20-year-olds.
>>36079181
They suck* you stupid nigger
>>36081408
Most 20 year olds don't lift. Just like he didn't lift when he was younger.
Seriously, some of you faggots have no idea. The point at which you think someone just has to be on junk is laughable.
>>36079104
come on the dude is over 50 and ripped as fuck. he's on something
>>36081689
fucking kek. watch this:
>>36078053
take his age into account. notice full muscles and high vascularity. also size.
I guess you are one of those guys that thinks that mike ohearn is full natty and that kay greene got big fucking grapefruits.
>>36082182
>he looks better than me and is older
>he must be on roids
>>36079995
legs are kill
>>36082182
No, I'm one of those guys who has been reported for "being on roids" at my work by a jealous fucking twink like you who thinks anyone bigger than them must be on gear.
I wasn't, as they found. I would put money on Jackman not taking anything too.
You know what changed between the first X-men movie and the later ones? He started lifting. Heavy. Before X-men he was a fucking dancer.
>>36082204
>>36082290
http://www.mensfitness.com/training/build-muscle/12-most-inspiring-hollywood-fitness-transformations/slide/8
this page claims he weighted 215 pounds an 6 foot 2. if you put him at 10% body fat (which he was way below) that puts him at a fat free mass index of 25, which is literally the natty limit for extremely gifted people. seeing that his bodyfat was lower then 10% and that he made les miserables before where he was a lot leaner, he re-reached the natty limit for dedicated bodybuilders quickly. especially since the study that calculated the natty limit used younger athletes
another news article put him at a fat free mass index of 24.1.
again, that is VERY close to natty limit, especially for someone that lost 10kg for les miserables and is 45+.
I mean, the second one is kind of achievable natty, and I agree that he is on way less roids then most other hollywood actors. but honestly, there is no way that he is not at least on high trt.
put yourself into a ffm calculator for perspective.
>>36081949
>47 is over 50
>>36077684
he probably is.Theres nothing too impressive like modern day bodybuilders, no big bis/tris, no capped delts, he's just low bf.He was also dehydrated 24hr before the shirtless scenes + holywood editing + perfect lightning + make-up
>>36082596
Ignoring the "natty limit" stuff, 5 seconds in google and I see he was 215 pounds when bulking and 200 when filming.
>>36081689
>>36082204
>>36082290
It saddens me to see such low IQ prevalent in today's society. If you think hugh jackman isn't on the juice, please consider one of the following options:
A) If you've just started out with lifting, educate yourself first, gain some experience, then be stupid on the internet. Or...
B) If you've been training for a while and you think he's not juicing, consider not having children. It's a big responsibility and you don't seem too bright to have offspring. They'll just suffer.
>>36081689
I agree with this guy completely.
Everyone on this board is in total denial about everything.
Realistically does him being natty or not matter at his age
Realistically at his age if you dont hop on trt you are just missing out on gains
>>36079597
well done anon.
>>36079399
I love that movie.
N-no homo.
>>36078053
100% on juice
>big (hes fucking huge)
>lean (his fucking veins have veins)
>pick one
Sometimes I think that mis/fit/s use the meme roids after 30's because they are just ignorant or they assume that active men will just start going down.
>inb4 that is true blablabla muh excuses
>>36077758
>he thinks this physique requires roids
How small are you honestly
>>36079326
>>36079354
I think so too
probably brad pitt in fight club too but that's it and that mode is considered full skeleton by /fit/
>there are people who believe that a natty 47-year-old can look like this giving advice on /fit/ right now.
>>36077767
>>36079181
HAHAHA
>>36079374
But he's not natty
>>36078053
If any of you guys achieve this literally 99% of the planet will think you're as hot as you can possible get
>>36079132
This
Like shit, you bench 100kg for reps, squat 140 for reps and deadlift 180-200 for reps
If you just get a low body fat you'll be good to go, why become a huge retard?
>>36078053
>>36077684
ausfag here
i've actually met hugh in real life, and belive it or not he came up and talked to me. i work at a pool that he took his family too so he had his shirt off.
he's pretty big. legs are nothing special but they're certainly not the chicken legs fit likes to make em out to be.
arguing about celebrities being natural reminds me of arguing with christians about god. no amount of facts and history lessons are going to change their little mind.
>>36078053
the one thing is his delts. I see highschool kids with better delts. this leads me to believe he is natty
>>36089901
And your post leads me to believe you have a profound intellectual disability.
>>36079326
chris pratt
>>36089963
lol u dumb nigga
>>36089979
no ur dum
>>36090030
Nah jiggaboo I got all the proper documentation that says otherwise
it gets better when he's handsome
which is always
>>36077684
I feel like we would need a good look at his dick, balls, & asshole to get a clear idea of whether he might be running a cycle or not. I really can't be 100% positive without a sniff test, but it'll do.
