How light does a girl have to be in order for an average man to lift her into his arms?
(A man who doesn't really exercise and is, say, 175cm/5'7")
>man who doesn't exercise
>5'7
might as well be a girl at that point
>>35797938
This tbqhwy brah
>>35797875
Like 50kg maybe
>>35797875
>A man who doesn't really exercise and is, say, 175cm/5'7
>5'7
>Man
Top bantz.
>>35797875
>5'7"
>175cm
uwotm8
120-140 for an average man, 160+ for a fit guy
>>35797938
>>35797948
>>35797957
>>35797963
Yet he gets laid and neither of you do
>>35797875
>175cm/5'7"
Those are not equivalent. Which is the original measurement? 175cm = around 5'9
Dated a chubby girl in hs, I was 5'10/145 and she was 160, I could lift her carry her real easy. I'm sure as long as your girl isn't obese you can do the same
>>35799428
Funny, I interpreted OP to be a woman asking how light she has to become so that guy can lift her. But alas, you're probably right. Men are the true romantics any way.
>>35799411
5'9" is exactly 175cm
>>35797875
Dude, I just finished a job for some company like 30 minutes ago and fuck the receptionist was perfect. The whole way home I day dreamed me lifting her up while we get married. I even shed a tear in the dream.
She was probably 110 to 120 pound marathon runner. She was probably 5". I think she may have been single. We chatted a bit. Professional job didn't ask for the digits. Fml!
>>35799521
I've seen different scales, google tells you one thing, random sites tell you infinite different stories. The imperial system is a disgrace and the cucked nations who still use it ought to be ashamed.
>>35799104
Big words for a small man. Especially considering how wrong they are.
>>35799571
no you idiot
5.7 inch are 5'9
shit man how can you suck so much with numbers, are you underage
>>35799731
>you suck so much with numbers
>5.7 inch are 5'9
My friend, the 5 in 5'9 stands for feet, not inches. 5.7 inches are still bigger than your dick but very small compared to an adult human's height.
>actually defending the imperial system in the 21st century
Barbarian, please.
>>35799771
oops :S
>>35799478
I am a woman.
>>35799687
See above.
>>35799687
15 inch shoulders detected. Keep telling yourself having lanky legs makes you a big man. My inborn traits mean I'm better than you.
>>35799792
Cards on the table, how fat are you currently? Be honest.
>>35797875
>>35799792
For him to be able lift you? 130
For him to lift you and not look like he's struggling and have to put you down right away? 80 lbs.
>>35799804
63 kg at 170cm
Gained over christmas so want to get back to 55 kg
>>35799815
I'll ohp you if it will make you love me.
>>35799792
My bad. Still, I like 'em taller than that. Like 6' +
>>35799798
whatTheFuckDidYouJustSayAboutMeYouLittleBitch.grllwrfr
>>35799792
tits or leave
>>35799814
>implying a dyel is gonna be able to OHP 1pl8
>implying it'll be easier with a person
>implying I don't know what irony actually is
>>35799815
>8 kg "over Christmas"
Wow, you really have to watch out then. 63kg at 1,70m isn't bad. It speaks for your character that you still want to get back to your previous weight. I feel like most women would just accept it as their new normal.
>>35799851
>attracted to women
>over 6 feet
Pick one.
Piggy backing on this thread.
How much would you want someone 5'1" to weigh
>>35799554
It's OK, you'd just have manlet babies. Nobody wants to put their kids through that.
>>35799827
/fit/
>>35799815
63kg I'm sure would be fine for an average male to lift and hold for a short period may be a little hard though, if it means that much to you loosing a little weight would certainly make it a lot easier for the man and less of a struggle
Is say 50kg is the cutoff OP
I like that porn standing stance . My calculations indicate that for an average height (1,75) male to be able to lift and fuck a female, she has to be around 50kilos
>>35801963
No less than 97, no more than 115.
If they're taller, then 123 to 132 become acceptable. 148 might be pushing it a bit, depends on how much of that is muscle and how much is healthy proportional >15% female bodyfat
>>35797875
110-125lb
Some dudes are too weak even for that
I carried my 130lb pregnant ex up the side of a mountain for a 500 foot elevation gain
And then took this picture
>>35803764
>I carried my 130lb pregnant ex
>ex
savage
>>35803832
>pregnant
>ex
enjoy your cucksupport payments.
>>35797875
175cm isn't 5'7 you idiot, it's 5 POINT 7 inches, which equals to somewhere right beneath 5'9.
There are 12 inches to a foot. Not very logical, I know.
YOU HAVE TO OHP THE HEAVIEST GIRL YOU'VE HAD SEX WITH
HOW FUCKED ARE YOU
>>35804161
>135
>lmao1pl8
>>35804161
>0 lbs
Welp.
>>35804161
I cant ohp 300lbs
And i cant unfuck that large, large woman
>>35799792
stop trying to defend your dainty ass boyfriend
the answer is never, unless he lifts or you lose weight
>>35799815
more than 10% bw in fat over Christmass
lmao
>>35797875
It's actually not that hard, assuming she falls into your arms from a standing position and you don't actually have to pick her up from the ground. If she's smaller than you you should be able to carry her
>>35797875
LMFAO1WOMAN
implying i dont lift 1 on each shoulder
>>35797875
>>35799104
2/10
>>35797875
I'd say 180lbs or lighter. I had a kind of fat gf when I was DYEL and I could still sweep her off her feet like pic related especially if she hopped into it. She couldn't have been more than 185, and that was basically my weight then.
I'm glad someone made this thread. I've always been curious about it but tfwnogf
>>35804161
>65 kg ohp
Fuck
>>35804392
gotta be high test to lift high test
>>35797875
5"9 is 175.
>>35804401
>65kg
>high test
Maybe in reality. But on /fit/ the average "high test" picture contains a woman who easily weighs over 70kg. It's disgusting.
>>35804469
>implying I was implying 65kg OHP is high test
low test detected
>>35804161
Her weight in a bar or the actual girl?
>>35804475
>making excuses for overweight women
>high anything
Not IQ, that much is certain. Likelihood of identifying as a "male feminist" maybe.
>be 174 cm
>always thought I was 5'7
>it's actually a little bit more
>mfw
I just went higher up in the manlet aristocracy
>>35804490
>though I was 177
>measured
>178.5
posture, my nig
also my coronation ceremony is being held early next week, feels good
Depends on her starting position and your lifting technique. My wife is 280 lbs, but I can drag her for 15 feet easy
I can CJP about 50kg, but with drunk-strength I ballerina-lifted a 65kg girl.
>>35804571
You are the scum of manhood
How tall are the girls you guys are talking about at those weights.. I mean the posts about >50 kg. What about a girl who is like 179 cm and lifts..
>>35804915
Well to be honest familia. You are using your back strength. You don't lift the grill with your arms. You just keep them stiff. And It's honestry much easier than what you think.
Grills get impressed as fuck with a man who is able to manhandle them but it's a preety easy strength display. I didn't even lift back then but i was still able to do it. JUST DO IT SENPAI
>>35797875
70-75kg max
>>35799571
1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters.
1 foot is 12 inches.
Figure it out yourself.
>>35799815
>63 kg at 170cm
What a whale
>>35797875
175 cm is 5'9" tho
> You'll never save a girl from a factory in a Naval uniform
.... :(
>>35799571
>cucked because we continue to use our traditional units instead of switching to the shitty French ones
Fuck off
>>35804161
>180lb 5'11 rugby player
>>35797875
Manlets! When will they learn
>>35804490
manlets are manlets, everything below 6' is just shit tier and nobody cares how small you are exactly, unless youre an actual 165 and below dude
