“I don’t believe in bodybuilders using steroids. If a man doesn’t have enough male hormones in his system to create, a nice hard, muscular body, he should take up ping pong.” - Steve Reeves
/fraud/ BTFO
>>35407423
the fuck is wrong with ping pong? Gump owned that shit, and would fuck that posing faggot right in his pert ass
>>35407423
But he himself was on steroids
>>35407557
What is your evidence?
>>35407940
his weight
>>35407997
And how does that prove anything at all?
>>35408025
he's a big guy
>>35408025
Look if you want to believe he was natty then fine, but literally everyone who gets to a certain size knows natty vs. not natty, but it is in everyones interest (the Bodybuilder, the gym, the supplement companies etc.) to claim their are natty. So they do.
>>35408032
Lots of big guys have been natural.
>>35408038
Looks like you're not willing to back up your assertions, he's not wildly big, at all, he trained for years, in a time where steroids were not prevalent.
>>35408052
Delusional
>>35408084
How so? I'm just asking for some kind of evidence and you're repeating yourself and appealing to fallacies.
>>35407423
>Some guy tells you you can only be genetically adept at things and discourages you to find a way to have the body you want
>Mindlessly believing some faggot like a drone
thanks for proving you're a beta cuck OP
>>35407423
>if you dont have superior natural talent you should just give up
Fuck you, Reeves... I used to think you were cool.
>>35408092
What evidence would make you happy though? A picture of him with a needle in his ass? You're basically resorting to a childish argument of "but u cn't pr0ve it".
There are many things in life which cannot be explicitly proven or demonstrated, but we can deduce based on their effects. As such, I cannot show you a picture of him with a vial of steroids, but it can be deduced from his physique.
>>35408137
Well, the FFMI? But I believe his is still within "natural" territory. I already said steroids weren't prevalent in bodybuilding in his time, that's what I've heard, you could try and argue against that? If he was on steroids they must have been available to him, maybe you could find some proof of that. You'd have a case with Ronnie Coleman or someone else wildly big, but that's not Reeves, your sophisticated method of "deducing" is just declaring and then calling anyone that disagrees a child. I can strawman too, buddy, "I JUS KNO DUMB KID CANT U SEE IT LOLOL?"
It's entirely possible he wasn't natural, but given what I've done in a couple years of working out I don't see his accomplishment as being so wild that steroids are a necessity, especially not for someone genetically gifted.
>>35408206
Okay dude lemme ask you this: Why do you care?
I'm not the guy you were/are still arguing with, btw.
Fuck that guy. People are also born with physical disfigurements and mental illness, should we not allow them to get surgeries/take medicine to fix their problems? They just need to deal with sucking because that's the card they were dealt?
What a dumbass
>>35408239
Two main reasons: first, I think Reeves is a good lifetime goal for serious bodybuilding-oriented naturals to strive for. And second, I've never liked people asserting things they refuse or fail to back up.
>>35407423
ping pong is actually really fun man
>>35408279
/fit/ will always have someone yelling roids on a respectable physique. It's just a way for these idiots to make themselves feel matter.
You can tell from some of the opinions in the natty limit threads here
>>35408279
>I've never liked people asserting things they refuse or fail to back up.
But it is impossible to back up,and the fact that almost every BB claims they are natty when they clearly aren't makes people naturally suspicious of anyone who professes they are natty.
>>35408390
Yes, that's why I mentioned Ronnie, with some people the assertion truly doesn't need proof, Reeves isn't "clearly" anything.
>>35408284
This
>mfw blowing out tryhard normies on my hall with my pengrip
>>35408902
>pengrip
wanna know how I know you pull sumo?
>>35408902
>>35409380
>tfw haven't played ping pong in over 2 years
fuark i used to love that shit
anyone else used to play shakehand??
>>35407557
Steeve Reeves had a FFMI of 25.7, which is just about the upper limits of a natty, and he wasn't especially lean. I'd say its 50-50 whether he's natty or not.
>>35409396
my highschool bought like 6-8 tables and lined them up on the edge of the cafeteria, I played with the same band of skellies til we could go off campus senior year
the skelliest of the skellies would play this gay defensive shit with his gay chinese grip while talking shit and I could never handle the banter
>mfw someone mentions pengrip
>>35408032
For you
>>35409744
if 6'1 tall weighing 215lbs @ low bf% isn't big for you then you must be quite a fattie yourself
Reeves got into the spotlight about 10 years after test got synthesized. Sergio Oliva and Kurz Marnul talked about Reeves' steroid usage, if you care to find the interviews.
>>35408032
4 u
>>35408025
BMI.
You're also one of the guys who believes Simeone Panda is natural, because of the polygraph test, right?
>>35411322
BMI? Do you mean FFMI? Because as another anon mentioned his was right around the natural limit of 25, and naturals have been known to exceed 25 before the time of steroids. Panda is another visibly drugged individual, though I appreciate your strawman.
>>35407553
bra ura faggot. read that last part one more time.
