Can someone link a few legit studies on aspartame that show that it's safe in normal doses? I need to BTFO some personal trainer faggot who thinks that diet sodas will spike your insulin and cause cardiovascular disease.
Just look up any. There's no credible studies that show it has any significant harmful effects. There's a reason he's a personal trainer and not a doctor/scientist.
>>35396507
Read the aspartame section.
http://examine.com/topics/Diet+Soda/
>>35396507
There's papers by the WHO before they got vegan cucked, and by various legit studies recorded over decades that disprove the 'lmao-mosanto' cancer meme argument. The insulin spike one is equally stupid, not only has it been proven not to happen, if it did anyway on a low to normal carb diet you'll just store your glucose from your food the same as you would if you had a sugary drink, you aren't hurting some mysterious process, because long term diets reduce insulin resistance and improve health in general.
It's honestly not worth arguing with broscientists through. They can't be btfo by real science because 'muh big pharma'
>>35396507
The easiest way to show this is to point out how diabetics interact with diet sodas. Even someone who just tosses away logic and science can't quite dismiss the fact that diabetics are free to drink diet sodas. If they reacted to diet sodas as they did regular ones, they would be put into life or death situations constantly.
>>35396507
>>35397023
Im diabetic and drink diet coke all the time. it doesnt affect my blood sugar at all. same as water
>he thinks a synthetic compound that has only been invented 40 years ago and has been heavily pushed on markets by the SAME guy that lied to you about Iraqs WMD's has any business being inside a wonderfully balanced biological system called the human body that has been evolving for hundreds of thousands of years
Stay pleb tier
>>35397052
Try telling that to people who get their information from their asses
>>35397088
nice dubs but proof read your posts m8.
>>35396507
A better question would be is there any legit scientific evidence to show that diet sodas spike your insulin? And the answer would be: no, there is none. You can't ever conclusively prove that something is safe, the best proof you can have is a lack of proof of danger.
Other way around.
You need to prove it's actually dangerous.
It's been investigated independently by nearly every countries own health organisations and found to have no risk.
It's been investigated by the cancer council and found to have no risk.
Investigated by NHS and found to have no risk
Investigated by the EFSA and found to have low risk.
Investigated by the FDA and found to have no risk.
>>35397088
do you eat meat?
do you eat plants?
do you drink water?
congrats you've just violated your own opinion as you've ingested chemicals that don't naturally exist within the wonderfully balanced biological system called the human body that has been evolving for hundreds of thousands of years.
>>35397088
>fake Wmds
They were real anon, they just went 'missing'
Murica was the one who sold them to Saddam back when he supported them in the gulf war/ early 90s.
>>35398218
>>35398218
the reason most disagree about this is because of each persons definition of a wmd is different. Of course there were none, but people will argue that 'dirty chemical bombs' made in small basements around the region would qualify as wmds and so there will always be those that will argue that their government overlords were just doing the best they can to protect you and your rights when it is them and only them that are taking them away
>>35396507
I saw an norwegian dokumentar which said the only danger came from too much acid which damaged ur bones/teeth. A glass or two per Day isnt bad
