About how much would someone have to weigh to reach this level of muscle/bodyfat at 6'?
>>35345809
190
>>35345853
seems doable
>>35345853
>190
he's prob like 165
even leaning he barely has traps
no legs
>>35345809
160, his legs are undoubtably tiny
>>35345900
Dubs confirms, as does this anon
>>35345908
>pic related is aesthetic af
>hurr durr no legs
SS is a meme, kiddies. Nobody thinks your fat ass looks good.
>>35345908
They aren't awful.
>>35345939
What are you even talking about you sperg
>>35345809
Who is this aesthetic man?
>>35345853
>>35345900
190 if he trains legs, 165 if he has chicken legs
>>35345989
These two>>35345900
>>35345908
His upper body looks amazing and the skinnyfat squad can only talk about how he probably has no legs.
>>35346009
https://twitter.com/Adi_Gillespie
>>35345988
More evidence why you should never do squats
>>35345809
>>35345853
>>35346016
>190
No fucking way. VitruvianPhysique weighed in at 170 when he did his last competition, he's 6 ft tall, bigger, and trains legs.
>>35346017
Amazing photo editing. What his PL total?
>>35346078
I doubt he gives a shit.
But still more than yours.
>>35346092
You in love with him or what? Any of us can look like that with juice and photoshop.
>>35345809
155-160 MAX even with legs in my opinion. I look kinda the same w/o the abs so visible because its winter
>>35346116
No, you cannot.
>>35345809
tren pounds
>>35346116
step up nigga
>>35346075
Only person that would compare this skelly to op's pic is vituvianphysique himself
Literally 17" arms compared to 12s
ITT a bunch of dyel, hes prob between 165-173
>>35345939
his legs aren't in the picture lmao...
>>35346016
>25 lbs of legs on that skinny faggot
w e w l a d
>>35345988
his legs are just messing with his image IMO
not saying don't do squats but I think he may have gone overboard on that shit
>>35346732
It doesn't really matter in the end whether he trained legs or not. /fit/ autists would still shit on him.
>>35346758
yea, that never has seemed to change on this board.
>>35346758
this
insecure ass faggots
>>35345809
170-180 tops, 190 not even close
>>35345988
holy t-rex, that's why you dont train legs as often as your upper body if you wanna look good, fuck
>>35346017
when discussing what weight he is at that size, the size of his legs matters.
>>35346238
the lens is distorting the image in the op, it makes everything nearer to the camera (his shoulder and upper arm) look more developed than it is.
>>35345809
160-170
He's leaning in to make his triceps an shoulders appear bigger than they really are
Attainable natty but he probably used drugs, considering getting that lean would require him to ensure a suppressed sex drive for months at a time, and seeing as he's tattooed and posts on IG, he probably parties and gets laid a lot.
So, test E.
>>35346775
>>35346806
you have to take into account his legs to work out his weight, and bro-splitters and roiders aren't as likely to have tree-trunk legs as a natty doing full-body compounds.
>>35346075
ok but being stage ready vs the pic in op's post is 2 compeltely different things you moron. Your Vitruvian is dried out and has close to no water weight because of Peak week. If he was to carb up for a few days and drink up he'd be around 180-185 mark so go fuck urself. And dont forget people have also different bone density.
>>35349616
>le fat makes your test go up meme
Gotta all the memes.
OP here. Nevermind, found a bb.com post where he said he was 5'10, 82kg.
>>35345988
about 80-85kg?