This guy claims cable skullcrushers/triceps extensions are superior to free weights.
Is he correct?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSOM2uqGWHw
>>35145698
>some random manlet claims something
who gives a shit
>>35145698
Yes
Makes sense, consistent tension through the motion
>>35145718
yes
>>35145698
Looking at the size of his arm. I'm gonna say no it isn't.
>>35145698
Sean Nal is actually really smart when it comes to lifting. Just doesn't really get that much attention because he focuses on proper content, as opposed to shitty daily vlogs.
He has another video on one arm cable curls facing outwards. Tried it at the gym. It's really good because it keeps constant tension on the bicep, similar to that skullcrusher vid
>>35146577
His arms are decently sized lol.
>>35145718
true
because gravity stops working time to time
>>35146622
then i guess simply racking/unracking the weights during bench press for example is a great way to biuld muscle
>>35145698
Who gives a shit. The end result is all that matters. You fags take part in the stupidest discussions ever.
>>35146622
Gravity only works in one direction is the point. You don't always move your weights exactly vertically.
>>35146855
To some extent, it is.
>>35146609
sean nal is my boy
>that pre-gains review
