Is mixing strenght and hypertrophy training the best option? I'm talking about splits like PPL. Doing Arnold's Golden Six right now, but I'm not sure about the results it will give.
Steroids xf
Any routine xf
8-12 reps for mass. 1-5 reps for strength. Sets depends on how many workouts you do. Want to keep each workout day between 15-25 sets total. Anything else posted is a meme.
>>34977305
>8-12 for mass
>1-5 for strength
DYEL??
>>34977305
>>34977315
Lost it at '1 for strength'
>1
>>34977305
>Want to keep each workout day between 15-25 sets total.
>mfw my workouts amount to 26 sets
>>34977334
ALL GAINS...LOST
>>34977305
BWAAAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAAHHAAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAA!!!!!
>>34977315
>>34977330
>>34977334
>>34977373
not the poster but what exactly is wrong with his statement?
>>34977389
Fuck off troll.
>>34977404
I'm fucking serious.
Everywhere it says exactly what he says.
1-5 reps for max strength / explosiveness with RFD component depending on intensity / load and tempo
8-12 reps at medium intensity with "time under load" low tempo for hypertrophy stimulation
how many bbers do doubles and triples?
how many power lifters or weightlifters do amraps or 10 reps (outside their GPP or for the sole purpose of mass gain)
>>34977441
are you deaf? I said FUCK OFF troll. Go post one of you're loli threads, you're not welcome here, little boy.
>>34977482
>are you deaf?
blind?
>I said FUCK OFF troll.
mfw
>Go post one of you're loli threads
you're
>you're not welcome here, little boy.
mfw
>>34977482
But seiously, what's wrong with that?
>>34977505
>>34977510
Fuck off I said.
>>34977518
no, for realz now
whats wrong with that
>>34977518
>>34977315
Fucking lost it, thanks for that picture
>>34977287
>>34977373
>nice glses
>still believing in the rep range meme
>>34977305
Dunt go 1 rep higher or lower dan dis kids or your gainz will stop and you'll get cancer in ur muzles
>>34977564
Everyone is different there is no ideal rep range, it depends on other factors.
Itt: skinny mad DYELs
>>34977510
Nothing is wrong you are absolutely right
/fit/ is full of shit
>>34977572
>multiple studies done proving it's about volume and not rep ranges
>no! rep ranges matter, it's just different for everyone!
>>34977572
>tfw also too unique for strength training
also
>6'1.5
>tfw too tall to squat
pls gib stetics routine
>>34977572
yeah like if they have a face or not
>>34977518
Guy don't leave me hanging here, what's wrong with that?
I'm desperate!
>>34977594
Wtf you going on about child? Dyel??
>>34977603
DYEL confirmed.
>>34977613
>he can't understand basic English or read a chart because he's a dumb Eurokek
>>34977607
saw that guy in Lisboa when I was 10... fucking scarred for life brehs
>>34977404
Thanks for making this thread into a good one anon!! Appreciate it brah!!!!!
>>34977305
>6-7 is the no gainz zone
>>34977564
>Factors controlled for: Volume-load
3x10 is better than 3x5 for size, phaggot.
>>34978508
>he doesn't know what volume means
you can't compare 3x10 vs 3x5, it's twice as much fucking volume. the comparison would be 3x8 vs 5x5
>>34978547
My point exactly. Rep ranges are very important when you control the sets. Most people do 3-4 sets of any given exercise, in which case they're better off doing 5 reps for strength and 10 reps for hypertrophy
>>34978591
the weight in 3x5 would be greater than in 3x10 if each set is done to failure, than the volume will be pretty much the same
>>34977287
How to into penis hypertrophy?
>>34978976
so in the end what matters is the number of sets done to failure or close to failure
>>34979018
Sheiko is high volume, rite? Would that make me look like a bodybuilder?
Srs
>>34979182
>Sheiko
if you dont eat like a whale, mantain a decent body fat, and do some isolations exercices
>>34979227
but hypertrophy wise?
just trying to learn, appreciate all answers.
>>34979310
Yeah I've seen that. Thanks man, just trying to make sense of everything (yes I've read the sticky).
There's so many different opinions (not only here) and people don't hesitate to confidently tell people "the truth" even if it has no scientific backing.
>>34977287
bump
>>34977287
All reps build both (5-12 usually) and it's all a meme. Overall volume and weight is more important.
Find what reps work the best for you, and switch it up sometimes/ depending on the program you run.
>>34977287
powerbuilding is, in my opinion, the best way to be strong et look strong. So mixing strenght with hypertrophy is the way to do
