>>34975050

>cooked beans vs dried beans

How does beef jerky have more protein than steak?!

>>34975210
What's your point exactly?

>>34975299
Fiber is magic so it disappears when you cook it

>>34975378
Even when I look at cooked canned black beans, the numbers still don't add up. The fiber is much closer (6.9g @ 100g), but there is a calorie deficit. The serving on this can is 130g at 110 calories. If I assume that the extra 30g is from the water and salt, then it would be 5g of fiber for 100g, but the calories should remain at 110. According to the USDA, however, 100g of cooked canned black beans should only be about 91 calories. The protein is also off by about a gram, as is the fat.

I understand that labels tend to round up or down, but these disparities are too big to be explained away with mere rounding.

http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/4757?man=&lfacet=&count=&max=35&qlookup=canned+black+beans&offset=&sort=&format=Abridged&reportfmt=other&rptfrm=&ndbno=&nutrient1=&nutrient2=&nutrient3=&subset=&totCount=&measureby=&_action_show=Apply+Changes&Qv=1&Q8953=1

>>34975499

Listen, pal. If you know what's good for ya, you'll stop asking questions. Capeesh?

>>34975050

1. Liquid was included in the can serving
2. There are more than one type of "black bean" so it could be a bit different from strain to strain

>>34975683
anon this isn't an American gangster movie

>>34975929
this plus the information on the label could be out of date

>>34975499
Holy shit you are so fucking stupid, I'm embarrassed for you.

>>34975499
Congratulations on actually thinking about what you're consuming. Now considering the fact that you were literally threatened here the next thing you should be doing is making your own beans from now on. You figured something out clearly if you're being threatened that they dont want the rest of the sheep putting together.

Black beans are a great protein source. There are additives in the canned version that prob lower the level of fiber in them