manlets
is thit guy natty? or is his routine worth trying?
The guy on right? If I remember correctly, he posted his progress on leddit.
Nearly every single person accused him of roiding and he basically got booed off.
His progress was so-so at start, then he suddenly got insanely ripped in the span of a couple months. Obvious user.
>>31902830
He could be, doesn't look too big or lean how long has he lifted?
>>31902853
>what is cutting
>>31902913
kek, he isn't. He went from skinny mode to fucking ripped in the span of 4 months, training 6 days a week with crazy volume.
IMO a good physique can be accomplished by everyone. Say you're 6' 205 lbs and have a decent amount of mass, but nothing spectacular. Spend 5 months cutting down to ~170 and I guarantee you'll look similiar to pic related. BF% is everything.
>>31902943
ok if it was only 4 months he's not natty if it was like 3-4 years he could be
is that clark kent?
>>31902943
He trains 7 days a week mate, doing crazy shit like 10-14 sets of cable flyes and such
https://www.reddit.com/r/Fitness/comments/2klc8h/5_year_transformation_m2362_145_193/
>>31904045
>training with that volume
>training with a full retard workout
he's obviously roiding.
>>31904076
Yeah there's no doubt about it lmao
>>31902830
Why would I say they are better than me?
I've always wondered what his cycle was, but he never admitted to using
>>31902830
L E G S
E
G
S
>>31904159
he has good legs tbh lad
https://imgur.com/a/hJ69i
>>31902830
He's not natty. In fact he took a fuckload of roids. he went from dyel to that in like 5 months or so. His routine is probably not worth doing either, but thats up to you.
>>31902830
guy on left is def roiding
>>31904239
>https://imgur.com/a/hJ69i
N O T B A D
O
T
B
A
D
I'm more interested in the guy off to the side in the cutoff shorts sleeveless shirt and what look to be women's cowboy boots.
>>31904309
>>31904271
>>31904241
>>31904239
>>31904159
>>31904138
>>31904099
>>31904086
>>31904076
>>31904045
>>31903004
>>31902966
>>31902962
>>31902913
>>31902913
>>31902943
>>31902853
>>31902830
>ITT: newfags
That's Clark Kent. He used to trip on /fit/ in 2013-14
>>31904360
been browsing /fit/ since before then, still don't know who he is
>>31904414
he posted in a few tinder threads. back when the archaeologist joke first came about.
>>31904360
Nobody gives a fuck if he tripped or not. All I hear is that he tripped but he never did anything or said anything worth while. Just another attention whore adie wannabe.
>>31904239
>that progress
>YEAH DEF NOT CHEATING
>
>>31904414
You can't be serious. I call BS.
Lol literally everyone on reddit called him out on roiding...btfo
>>31902830
i would splatter all over their chests
>>31902830
Do women like the bf on the left? Seems more attainable for me. What is that, 12-14%?
>>31905546
the only trips I remember are zyzz, tinytrip, and scooby1969 or w/e
I really don't care about trips
>>31905546
Oh I remember him now
Vaguely anyway, he wasn't really big game, like scooby, nunu/ennui, tiny, zyzz etc were
>>31904456
he posted in 2000 B.C.?
>>31905727
why would you care? dumbass
>>31905727
Nobody likes the guy on the left; he's a manlet wearing jorts and a GGW cap
>>31906580
Great sentence, shame there was not a fucking flicker of humour in it. Unfunny fruit
>>31905727
closer to 14-16%
maybe a very bloated 12-14%
