Is fruit actually good for you? I eat a ton of strawberries and blueberries, but I feel like the sugar content is probably about as bad as drinking a soda. Is there such a thing as good sugars?
>>37280457
yes, fructose is different than glucose. PLus fruit has vitamins, minerals, antooxidants and phyto nutrients.
>>37280457
Don't drink the carbonated jew motherfucker, eat your fruits.
>>37280457
The sugar in fruit is better, because it is not a "free sugar"
It is encased in fiber, which essentially negates all the detriment of sugar intake.
It just counts towards your daily carbohydrates intake, so as long as it doesnt affect your macros, it is fine.
Fruit juices, however, do count as free sugars, unless you were to mix psyllium husk or something similar in, to make it gooey.
Even then you are allowed to eat a good 75g of free sugars a day wi little to no consequence.
>>37280579
Nonsense.
Fructose and glucose are functionally identical.
Also please recognize that "sucrose" is basically 50% fructose and glucose, so it isnt different than either.
Sugar is sugar, the only factor that matters is glycemic load, which is determined by bioavailability, which is generally determined by fiber content
>>37280693
Fructose without fiber is harmful for your liver nonetheless, which is why people shouldn't drink soda, even if it says no calories/no sugar added.
>>37280457
>>37280693
>Nonsense.
>Fructose and glucose are functionally identical.
Shithead, watch vid related and then keep your dumb mouth shut.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM
>>37280457
Fruit is a meme. It's just sugar.
Berries are extremely low in sugar so go wild
>>37280631
Carbonated (seltzer) water is amazing for cutting.
>>37280728
>he disregards actual academic literature in favor of one pseudoscientist quack with a lecture on jewtube
Protip: just because you get a degree doesnt mean you are infallible. Peer review exists for this reason.
>>37281000
>Protip: just because you get a degree doesnt mean you are infallible. Peer review exists for this reason.
Protip: just because you are a neet who shit posts on .fit/ doesnt mean you know more than a phd holder. How about you post some studies saying hes wrong.
>>37280728
>hurr calories are a myth.
Fuck that ignorant cunt.
I cut from 265 to 175 and i never cut sugar out of my diet.
if you think calories dont real, you are literally retarded.
This motherfucker is just butthurt he cant count calories
>>37281095
You are completely mis representing what he is saying you fucking moron. Calories are still important but where those calories come from are just as important you fat loser.
>>37281033
Literally all of academic nutrtional science is what he was disagreeing wi.
He freely admits this in the video.
To say caloric surplus is not the primary factor behind weight gain is as scientific as saying evil spirits live inside sugar, and this is what makes you fat
