>Bohoho today's cartoons are too shallow to warrant any serious discussion.
>Implying you know jackshit about storytelling and world design in the first place, enough to have any serious discussion.
>Implying you ever had what it takes to be a successful writer, director and pitch bible creator.
Show discusion leads to comparison comparison leads to ponys and ponys lead to barneyfag
>implying I don't
>>82756069
C'mon /co/ don't kid yourself, you'll never be like your superior scientist friend /tg/. He's based on creating his content while you're based on discussing existing content you never created.
But pick a movie, a tv series, an animation, an idea and feel free to prove me dead wrong.
We haven't had a genuinely creative thread in eons. And no Batman vs Supers doesn't count as a discusison, that's just "lol my action figure can beat your action figure. uh uh nuh uh nuh uh etc. etc."
>>82756166
>you'll never be like your superior scientist friend /tg/
>>82755829
I've written a couple of short films that were shown at a festival. Which pretty much anybody can.
They were (mostly) shit.
Writing's hard and yeah most people can't write and still like to criticize, which, honestly that's fine, they criticize it as an audience, the people for whom the piece is literally made, not as creators.
>>82756465
Well post them, faggot. We won't bitetoo much.
Well it is just a shitty chinese imageboard full of teenagers. Writing takes life experience in order to realistically replicate the events and personalities of your tv series and movies.
>>82755829
>>82756166
OP's pretentious levels are through the roof.
>>82755829
Success and quality are not particularly related.
>>82755829
I created a bible, don't you tell me I can't. I didn't spend years at the monastery for nothing.
>watching cartoons instead of anime
