Do you think Marvel or DC will ever shove animal people into one of their big budget superhero movies? Joss loves Tigra, Wondy's getting a movie and her main villain is ostensibly Cheetah...
>>84534400
Only if they make the movies in prison where Furries belong.
>>84534412
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvjJcaVJlH0
>>84534400
If the WW movie is a hit, we will probably see Cheetah in a sequel.
>will probably be shitty cgi instead of makeup
>>84534400
The Lizard and Killer Croc are animal people, aren't they?
>>84534400
No. Rocket is the furriest thing you'll see adapted in the MCU.
With luck the new Green Lantern movie will feature Ch'p or Bd'g in an attempt to say "We too have space critters!" like they did with Baz's introductory arc in the comics after Rocket became super popular.
Isn't WW's main villain Ares?
>>84535443
Making WW's arch Ares is a recent phenomena because it can be hard for people to buy the fact that greek demi-goddess on the level of superman's main villain is a furry lady.
Her arch was usually Cheetah.
>>84534400
They won't. They're just as rabidly afraid of anything that seems furry as mooks on the internet who'd rather spank it to children in cartoons.
>>84535242
But they aren't FEMALE. They rule is
1: It's gotta be a male
2: NO innuendo/romance/HINT of attraction to human
>>84534412
Furries fucking own.
>>84535443
>>84535480
Ares also markets better to both genders
Guy's like his edge lord looks and persona
Girl's enjoy the whole sticking it to the Alpha Male shtick you can bring with big A
>>84535668
That is nothing of OPs post,
>>84535668
Why anyone would female furries with inuendos?
Who would be unironically patethic and autistic..and...Holly shit, furry enough for it? Its like the bottom of the well.
I would pitty these poor beta creatures.
![charlton-heston-planet-of-the-apes-kissing-600[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/QDS8S3f.jpg "charlton-heston-planet-of-the-apes-kissing-600[1].jpg")
>>84535668
>>84535800
I'm responding to the guy I quoted, not OP. What are you talking about?
Consider that making a character almost completely CGI like that could well be throwing hundreds of thousands of dollars away for no return if the character isn't well-liked.
>>84534400
>who is Rocket Raccoon
>who is Howard the Duck
>>84534400
Rocket and Howard both got into Guardians of the Galaxy no problem because that film didn't try to take itself too seriously. It was just some good fun. I expect more anthro characters from Marvel's universe to pop into the sequel as well.
Most super hero films now adays, especially DC's stuff, try way too hard to be serious. That's why you'll never see Wonder Woman fight Cheetah in a movie unless the Cheetah was more or less just a skimpily dressed woman in cheetah body paint/body suit. It'd be 'too silly' otherwise.
>>84536021
Didn't stop them with doomsday
>>84536021
The xmen movies do it with Jlaw and still succeed, even if she is really annoying.
If Cheetah ever makes it into the DCEU, and she won't, they would probably go the "skinned cheetahs sacrificed in a ritual to the cheetah god" route.
>>84536220
Doomsday is a huge generic monster, and not really much of a character.
An actual CGI anthro character would require a lot more time and effort, as they would be in the film longer, have better models as they would not just be in action scenes, but in scenes with just talking and dialogue, and have a wide range of emotions without looking out of place.
Rocket Raccoon and Groot were probably the best results of this, but that movie was a huge risk in general.
>>84535668
>>84535974
You quoted me, and I responded to the OP. Neither me nor the OP mentioned anything about being female or innuendos. You just came up with that and it's completely irrelevant to what was being discussed.
>>84535443
Cheetah is easily WW most well known villain and is seen as her arch nemesis.
>>84535860
Furries never came up with a term for non-furries.
Isn't that interesting?
You don't matter to them.
They know - know, in a way that owes nothing to conscious thought, know in their blood and bones - that they predate any other cultural expression. For all intents and purposes they have always been here.
And they always will be here.
>>84536305
Cheetah can be pulled off with makeup. Look at beast from the x-men movies......well just look at Grammer in Last Stand, the other beasts kind of suck.
>>84537720
Seriously wouldn't be that hard. Just cgi her tail.
>>84537824
>>84537663
"Hyoomans".
Humans have always been interested in making anthropomorphic personifications of anything and everything, whether animal, vegetable, mineral or metaphysical concept. This has been one aspect of human cultural expression since the dawn of time, and will continue to be so until the human race goes extinct.
The Furry fandom didn't exist until the 1980s. Humans were creating anthropomorphic animal characters before Furries existed, and continue to create such characters outside of, and despite the existence of, Furry fandom. Furries consume what humans produce.
>>84537720
>>84537824
Probably a mix of CGI and makeup. In particular CGI for the mouth to ensure facial prosthetics don't get in the way of talking or range of motion.
>>84536188
Opposite, putting her in a skimpy outfit would be too silly. Werecheetah would be far more serious; just trend towards monstrous rather than sexy.
>>84538241
Werewolves, shamans who dress in animal skin to take on their aspect and power, even just women wearing fur coats.
You know it's true. What to call 'furry' and what not is completely arbitrary.
>>84538241
>1980s
>>84535242
Shouldn't this be the end of the thread? Just watch soosai skwa, OP.
>>84539382
Isn't that from a shitty webcomic?
>>84538241
>the furry Fandom didn't exist until the 80's
Wrong.
There were furry cons back in the 70's. And before that furries were regulars at sci-fi cons.
>>84538405
They could do it like the cat-kin in Dr. Who...then again, every one of them, no matter how old or evil, was hot. Do that for a character who's actually supposed to act seductive, and theater fappin's gonna happen.
>>84539521
I really cannot in good conscience call Dreaming of Utopia 'shitty.'
but its... its... I dont know what it is.
Furries are an abomination and deserve to die.
>>84540478
Do furries even do anything outrageous or super dramatic anymore or is it just one of those "low hanging fruit" deals?
>>84540803
depends
if you only consider fursuiting mental defective chucklefucks that go to cons and parties furries, then they're quite likely the most STD-ridden group of people on earth behind rampaging African militias.
if you aren't one of those people who deny people who only like furry porn aren't furries then furries are mostly ok and even great compared to other social groups.
>>84535668
So you just want your furry waifus in some movies, huh?
>>84540868
*are, fuck
anyway, furries are still drama whores and literal whores, the "furry lifestyle" is nothing but sodomy and excess.
>>84540952
>>>84540868
>*are, fuck
>anyway, furries are still drama whores and literal whores, the "furry lifestyle" is nothing but sodomy and excess.
You are living in the past, anon. Furry drama has cooled down a lot since then.
/pol/ is essentially the furries of today.
>>84540952
>anyway, furries are still drama whores and literal whores, the "furry lifestyle" is nothing but sodomy and excess.
Actually, not really. The drama has cooled down a lot. Younger artists who are new to the fandom have heard the horror stories and pretty much stay away from that type of thing. It's been like that for a long time
>>84536277
I bet it'd be both. Start out with skinned cheetahs, but at the end of the movie, the gods grant/curse her with extra power and she goes were-cheetah for the final fight.
>>84535480
>Post-Crisis origin
>1985
>"recent phenomena"
>>84535242
Croc is more of a guy with a skin condition. Connors is accurate, though.
>>84540884
Wolfsbane is ALREADY in an upcoming movie...but don't be surprised if the movie is quietly cancelled. I almost expect it. The logic will be "We have no upcoming New Mutants comic to ride this movie's nuts with...and really, people BARELY know the X-Men. Nobody's gonna want to see THIS."
>>84539521
>dreaming of utopia
I wonder if the creator is a closet furfag?
>>84542194
last horror story i heard was from early this yearbeing a furfag myself i have every reason to hate other furfags, not just memeing
>looking for a good Anime Cat Girl that could be a good look for Cheetah
>find this instead
>>84543464
Seems like sound logic. You aren't implying that it'll be canceled because it has a something approximating a furry in it, are you?
>>84543057
Old Croc. New. Croc is a fucking 8ft crocodile!
>>84534400
Unfortunately the Wondy movie villain is 100% going to be Ares. Boring cocks with a God of War fetish love Ares
>>84535443
kys
>>84546163
Not outright, no...but teh squick will be a contributing factor. Wolfsbane will be a little TOO hot if they can make her look anything like her og comics version (and GEEZ, look who's playing her. Gonna be hard to ugly THAT up). They had best avoid the whole "unstable molecules costume" (running around naked except for fur in hybrid form, like the chicks from Cats) stuff from the comic series and put her in some spandex for hybrid form, like in the other, later titles she appeared in.
>it's a furries pretending that they matter and aren't garbage thread
>>84539521
>dreaming of utopia
I've never read a weirder web comic in my life.
>>84534400
This is what happens when the janitor stealth bans Zootopia threads.
>>84537824
>>84538405
It would probably make more sense just to go full CG. I'd love to be surprised with something that combines makeup and CG though.
>>84549591
I say just use bodypaint. It always looks better than CG. As long as they don't overdo it like Mystique it'd be fine.
>>84549747
Giving her fur would be really difficult with prosthetics or a body suit. Not necessarily impossible, but preventing things like wrinkles that give away that it's a suit would be very difficult. Maybe that's where the CG would come in-- they could digitally erase the wrinkles in the body suit.
>>84535739
Go to Furry Hell.
>>84536277
>Cheetah's in the WW porn parody
>They use this costume
>>84549985
Generally she doesn't have fur. Most of the time she's just colored.
I really hope after Infinity Gauntlet the next Avengers is just West Coast with Tigra and Wonder Man etc.
>>84550190
Yeah but that's boring. Besides, we've all seen bodypaint before and it would look too much like a Halloween getup. It's not ambitious enough for a big budget movie.
>>84550190
That's cuz the artists suck. She's supposed to have fur.
>>84534721
nah, I wouldn't rule out makeup Cheetah
>>84551410
Makeup has come a really long way, people tend to underestimate how good it can look nowadays.
You have awful amateur crap like Walking Dead but the very best out there make fucking miracles with rubber and paint.
They get something done like Avatar, it could be great.
If they made amazon sized blue alien cats mainstream, this shouldnt be hard
>>84551410
>We could get Cheetah with Mystique like makeup
my baaalllllllssssssssssss
>>84551027
Comic book artists are notoriously lazy and lacking in imagination. If they can just add some extra lines and colors to a nude human figure that's what they will do 9 times out of 10. When you require some actual creativity from them for say, creating a character who is a hybrid of woman and cat, they will just find an easy short cut like drawing a regular woman and adding some crudely drawn zig-zag stripes or spots and then they leave it to the colorist to figure out the rest. And don't you dare ask them for anything technical like tufts of fur, because they didn't teach that in figure drawing class.
>>84552413
If they use prosthetics like that, it would be to give her fur. I would be interested to see how that works.
>>84536277
>>84536188
>>84534400
I would have Circe as the big bad in a sequel, and introduce Barbra Minerva as an ally of Diana's. Circe has the power to turn people into animals right? Have Circe turn Barbara into Cheetah in the final act and set her up as a villain.
>>84546553
Why does /co/ hate Ares?
>>84535321
>Baz's introductory arc in the comics after Rocket became super popular
Reminds me of when they turned Captain Carrot into Captain K'Rot after Rocket became popular.
>>84552069
>You have awful amateur crap like Walking Dead
I actually like how the Walking Dead zombies are really stylized. Besides, the budget is probably stretched doing dozens of extras across a ton of episodes a year, compared to a single movie.
>>84552871
Comic book artists work on a schedule. Sorry that they can't make your furry waifus as furry as you want.
>>84554537
I expect a certain level of quality from people who get paid to do things professionally.
>>84535655
It seems that Furries aren't as weird anymore.
Tumblr and Bronies and normal internet people got crazier. Furries are old hat. Also you see all of these Anthro-based series and movies happening all of a sudden. (Zootopia, Sing, Bojack, Gumball, Bunch of foreign stuff and assorted pilots).
I think that DeviantART kids who made sonic fan-art and random furry stuff in the 90s and 2000s are becoming showrunners now. (Wasn't the art director of Bojack (Lisa Hanawalt) an online anthro artist?)
>>84555137
Sounds like you have unrealistically high standards if superficial details matter so much to you.
>>84537663
There were the ones who used the term "mundanes" to refer to non-furries.
>>84555472
It's not "superficial details," it's a lack of creativity. Most superheroes are just a basic nude body with "superficial details" drawn on them to differentiate one character from another. This accepted convention is why it's actually pretty easy for a fine arts major to get comic book gigs if they know basic anatomy, but they would never make it doing concept art. The comic industry has decided that the gold standard for comic art is realistic human nudes, and they seek out artists who are willing to produce that kind of artwork for cheap because unemployed fine arts majors aren't that hard to find.
Artists who are perhaps a bit less realistic in their style but have a much keener eye for aesthetics and creative design are much more likely to get jobs in the movie and gaming industries, because comic book publishers don't offer the kind of challenge they want. If they do comics they're more likely to be interested in creating graphic novels as auteurs rather than illustrating issues of superhero comics that someone else wrote.
>>84555732
I remember seeing a really cringey MTV documentary about furries on Youtube, and one of them refered to normies as "mundanes." I like jacking off to furshit as much as anyone else but holy shit those guys were so pretentious about it.
>>84555846
The issue is the most vocal and seen/known part of every fandom is always the worst part. Like how when you mention 4chan the general populace thinks of /b/.
>>84555916
To be fair we are a kind of shitty community, but we have more fun and it's one of the only places online where you can say whatever opinion you want without it coming back to bite you in real life.
>>84553618
Tradition. Even the Olympians hated him.
>>84555137
..Oh, Rocket... you used to be a HERO.
>>84555732
I am an on-and-off furry artist, but none of the people I have encountered ever used the term. What's your experience?
>>84555846
That sounds like Otherkin. That's like saying slime molds are fungi because they kind of look alike.
>>84557082
There is unsurprisingly a lot of overlap between otherkin and people who have fursonas.
>>84535739
I can't imagine how socially deprived you mustve been to think becoming a furfaggot was a step in the right direction.
>>84555137
GAK!
>>84534400
Using real animal, maybe we will be lucky and they eat snyder.
>>84546889
I...I think I kinda know the guy whose did that comic.
>>84555811
Bruh, things like "tufts of fur" are entirely superficial and do not matter to people that don't go around masturbating to animal people.
>>84552094
rofl oh,shit, that face!! Cracks me the fuck up every time I see it.
>>84550096
I'm glad they caught Tigger before he could hurt anybody else...that was a dark, DARK week.
>>84535668
>implying anyone should cater to /s/furs
the lowest of the low.
>>84560572
Not even that anon but he was clearly saying they just take a nude body and color it differently instead of trying to make an original looking character
"tufts of fur" is just an example. Don't you understand how human language works or are you autistic??
>>84561124
My money's on "full-goose autist".
>>84561124
>Not even that anon but he was clearly saying they just take a nude body and color it differently instead of trying to make an original looking character
This isn't even true. There are plenty of characters that have more detailed looks. Ms. Marvel isn't drawn as a nude body. neither is Thor, Nova, Hulk (he has shorts now), and Karnak, just to throw in a less popular example. On the DC side of things, Dick Grayson wears actual clothes, Wonder Woman has a skirt and some armor, and Batgirl has that silly practicool costume that does everything it can to not be a nude body model.
The reason I go back to tufts of fur is because it's obvious that's what's really bothering anon. He's all in a huff because his furry waifus just aren't drawn furry enough.
>>84562099
Fur is to an animal character whst muscles are to Hulk.
>>84562348
Not really. Muscles aren't superficial for the Hulk.
>>84562395
>Character becoming a feral, violent beast and shedding clothes and civilization
>Superficial
Bet you like your werewolves not to have fur too.
>>84562555
We're talking about animal people here buddy. Not monsters like werewolves.
>>84562555
I think what everyone is failing to grasp is that properly rendered fur is a pretty big time sink for the artist, inker, and colorist.
>>84562604
Literally the first thing I said.
>>84554537
>>84562600
>I dont know the first thing about Cheetah
She's practically a werecat
>>84562099
>see not exactly 100% of characters are drawn as nudes recolored
golly gee you sure understand how human language works.
and since when is nightwing not just a nude recolored? (maybe they changed his costume recently. He was just a nude guy painted black with a blue logo for the most part)
just forget "tufts of fur" as its really bothering you. He's saying there is no attempt at making the character look interesting. Just a naked lady painted like a cheetah with a tail added on.
>>84562604
>>84562689
...but they have animals in comics that have fur!?!?! or just a lot extra details in general. (depends on the artist)
>comic book artists have a time schedule
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>84562987
Dick Grayson isn't even Nightwing anymore you tard. Are you really complaining about comics when you don't even read them?>inb4 where do you think you are
>>84562828
Does she become a great big cat monster?
>>84563271
Nope, stays in cat-lady form, artists, depending on skill, depict her with varying degrees of human. Obviously, least skill = more human. More skill = more feline features.
>>84562600
>animal people
>apparently vastly-different from werewolves
>who are people who (usually in comics) turn into animal-people
Are you clinically-brain-dead?
>>84563271
She's a human-sized cat-creature, with fur, claws, fans, and sometimes a goddamn tail.
>>84563497
*FANGS
...goddammit.
>>84563530
No, you were right, she's got fans,too.
>>84562987
>there is no attempt at making the character look interesting.
You could probably blame DC trying to keep her like the old Cheetah from the Superfriends where she was just a woman in a cheetah costume. You should expect much from a company that took over 70 years to give her the cheetah eye marks and still refuses to make Wonder Woman taller than Superman or Batman.
>>84562604
It doesn't have to be meticulously rendered. There are many shorthand ways of conveying that a character has fur that look convincing in a 2D format.
>>84563497
Werewolves tend to be fur free humans that shift into a giant bestial wolf-like monster, or sometimes just into a plain old wolf. Yes, that is vastly different from "a human-sized cat-creature, with fur, claws, fans, and sometimes a goddamn tail".
>>84564144
While the folkloric werewolf was indeed a large monster wolf, in the comics (and movies), werewolves have generally followed the Larry Talbot model, as the most famous comic book werewolf demonstrates (pic related). Sometimes they have digitigrade feet and wolf-heads, but basically a furry man-sized humanoid with claws, a slight snout, fangs, and pointed ears.
(Note The artwork shown here is over 40 years ols note the care taken to depict fur)
Not vastly different at all.
>>84564814
Astounding Wolf-Man is the only comic book werewolf that matters. Normal, non-furry obsessed people don't even know about Werewolf By Night or whatever the fuck that is.
Yankee Poodle never
>>84565353
Werewolf By Night was created by Gerry Conway & Mike Ploog (genius artist), and was the longest-running, most successful werewolf comic ever. He's guest-starred in big comics, like Spider-Man, and Frankencastle, has teamed up with Iron Man, and has had animated cartoon appearances.
Your Man-Wolf lookalike? No one who matters has ever heard of it, let alone read it.
Bad Dog was better.
>>84564814
To be honest: in fiction, both video and literature, the MEN'S version of werewolves is pretty much Werewolf The Apocalypse's/Forsaken Crinos/Gauru form.Big, biped engine of destruction. WOMEN'S version is a dude who changes into a regular wolf. And in Teen Wolf's case, lame Lon Chaney-style. Anything *too* much of a hybrid, and women get squicked.
>>84565486
Why live?
>>84565696
You sure do know a lot about furries. It's quite disturbing.
>>84565742
This isn't/tg/.
>>84566005
Shouldn't you be out looking for Pokemon?
Christ, I'll be glad when you kids go back to school.
>>84566141
You do know that accusing somebody of being a summerfag isn't really that great of a comeback, right? Are you not really trying to be witty or clever because you're too busy searching for the furriest furry porn on the internet? Do you wear a fursuit while you masturbate? Do you have those buttplugs with the animal tails attached?
Help me to understand you.
>>84565353
Reminds me of Wolfchild. It is a fun retro game.
>>84557441
There's literally nothing wrong with furries.
>>84566141
Who said it was? I was comparing men's and women's taste in werewolves.
>>84565742
>>84566473
What makes you say this? I'm open to the idea that they're outliers, but the women I've known were all about the Crinos.
