>its a tony BTFO daredevil issue
>>84509937
Why wouldn't he? Even his most basic, entry level iron man suit is still a human shaped mech tank with lasers and an array of sensors.
A baseline human with radar senses and a couple batons ain't gonna do jack against that.
>>84509937
>"WHO'S FOOT IS THAT? I CAN'T SEE SHIT!"
And now he's being replaced by black girl.
laughingbendis.jpeg
>>84509937
I love it when street level characters get put in their place.
>>84509937
>went from a boring asshole to an entertaining one
>actually stopped jobbing for once in his sorry existence
>armor was cool
Superior ended too soon
>>84510052
I agree, I actually really like iron man but this has got to be one of my all time favorite suits. And as a villain he just works great.
So with all that the suit was capable of, who could feasibly defeat ultimate iron man?
>>84509982
Kek
>>84510052
He only ever jobs because much morals. This run pretty much proves that.
>>84510084
Tony was a villain ever since Civil War, he was just a shitty boring villain that writers used as an evil strawman.
People are never going to be able to buy 616 Tony as a good guy ever again so you may as well have fun with the concept.
>No Superior Iron Man OHC
Why is this?
>>84510115
They could have at least had his superior suit in all other issues. I mean even captain marvel would be BTFO by it.
>>84510090
Probably a determined thor and pretty handily vision I'd say
>>84509937
so if marvel allowed this book to continue, what do you think it will happened
>>84509937
And way overdue, too.
"Superior Iron Man" still fell hopelessly short of selling the message "What Tony Stark would be capable of as a supervillain".
>beating up the disabled
Disgusting
>>84510404
Event comic.
Tony builds the things he builds even when he intentionally designs his suits around the notion that he doesn't kill anyone intentionally.
Tony has a no-kill rule as rigid as Spider-Man's, it's just that he never outright states it. And I suspect that this is because if he didn't have one, he wouldn't have a rogues' gallery at all.
A Tony Stark without doubt, without caring about human lives except in the abstract sense of "I fight for order, peace and the future of humanity", would be a terror easily on the level of Doctor Doom.
But people forget what he is capable of.
Occasionally, we get to see that aspect of Tony - the chilly practicality of the man when he is hard at work.
>>84510782
>>84510772
The term is "differently-abled". Check your privilege.
I miss the days when he was just a heroic, responsible guy.
Thing is, they write him like he's Spider-Man now - like he's nervous and feels the need to quip all the time. Not take anything seriously.
I fucking hate that so much.
>>84510817
Damn you must be old as shit.
>>84510865
Yes. Yes, I am. I became a full-on fan in 1996, but I had been a sort-of fan ever since the Secret Wars, when he was still called 'Staalman' over here.
>>84510782
>level of Doctor Doom
That too far fetch. Then again, Tony can access a lots of technology from his friend and foe
>>84510915
How do you feel about Ultimate Iron Man because to me that was the last Tony that was a straight up good guy.
>>84509937
I absolutely hated this run, it was the most boring iteration of Stark ever, making him a stereotypical supervillian was such a weak gimmick.
>>84511096
I liked him! I was rooting for him and 616 Tony to be fused, just like before.
>>84511145
I so disagree. They didn't take it nearly far enough.
>>84512946
In a weird way I'm kinda glad Ultimate Tony is gone because now they can't assassinate his character like they did with the 616 version.
