So is he yet another writer who's shit at Marvel but good at DC?
>>84493210
>"ok Sam, give me back my rings"
I have a theory /co/ likes him bc Simon and Jessica are basically blank slates to build up. I remember a lot of complaints about his Marvel stuff being "Not Muh ________"
>>84493210
I don't fucking understand it.
>>84493268
it's because /co/ still thinks Quill has to be an edgelord
>But good at DC
He's shit at DC too. You guys just eat anything DC spews out
>>84493334
This. Green Lanterns is mediocre as fuck
Pretty much. Green Lanterns is enjoyable as hell even though it's not high art by any means.
Add Abnett, he has made Earth 2 society enjoyable
>>84493369
It's okay, but a massive improvement over his Marvel work.
>>84493467
Anything is an improvement over his Marvel work. His DC work is slightly better than his Marvel work due to characters acting less out of character compared to his Marvel work.
>>84493210
It's the magic of DC, OP.
I shudder to think what he'll do once he comes upon G'nort.
>>84493456
His marvel work is good too though
>>84493679
Or Chaselon.
>>84493684
Infinity was shit
>>84493772
Hickman wrote Infinity anon
>>84493369
It's a fun-mediocre, which is very welcome since GL has been miserable-mediocre to shit for the past few years.
Avengers AI was good. It just didn't catch the market.
>>84496241
This. It's not the best thing ever but it's pleasant and entertaining which is a shitload more than I can say for anything GL related since like, Johns' early new 52 stuff
